Parse this instead...
 

In article .com,
says...

And now that I have had a chance to read some of these links, I see
nothing but what you have here on rec.boats. Lots of sensational
accusations, with nothing backing any of them up.. I am getting tired
of reading fairy stories.

Here, please view the video. It'll give you some idea of how sick
O'Reilly really is...

http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/1gmarchiv...reilly_sc.html

Parse this instead...
 

In article .com,
says...


And now that I have had a chance to read some of these links, I see
nothing but what you have here on rec.boats. Lots of sensational
accusations, with nothing backing any of them up.. I am getting tired
of reading fairy stories.

Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php

Parse this instead...
 

In article .com,
says...


And now that I have had a chance to read some of these links, I see
nothing but what you have here on rec.boats. Lots of sensational
accusations, with nothing backing any of them up.. I am getting tired
of reading fairy stories.

And here's one that shows he doesn't give a flying **** about facts...

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/05/oreilly-lies/

Parse this instead...
 

In article .com,
says...
On Jul 11, 5:47 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
A bunch of stuff he heard, which was quickly debunked as plain rubbish.

Still nothing?? You don't really watch fox, you just said that. Of
course, the whole buying into the Media Matters story about Bill
really gave you away. Later, going fishing now, there's nothing to
see
here.

You, apparently, aren't among those with at least half a brain who know
O'Reilly paints with the broadest brush in the universe and that he
doesn't give a **** about facts, only ratings.

His loud, obnoxious, testosterone-driven, know-it-all style is a front
so pinheads like you will believe him. You a fan of Rush Limbaugh too?

jps

Parse this instead...
 

In article .com,
says...

And now that I have had a chance to read some of these links, I see
nothing but what you have here on rec.boats. Lots of sensational
accusations, with nothing backing any of them up.. I am getting tired
of reading fairy stories.

Another by Bill Moyers, perhaps one of the most astute and honorable men
of this generation.

Here's what he has to say about his exchange with Bill O.

http://www.current.org/news/news0222BillvBill.html

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 11, 6:28 pm, jps wrote:
In article . com,
says...







jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

jps wrote:

Not even Fox (Republican talking points distributor) News would have the
gall to share your rich fantasy.

jps

I'm a republican and I don't talk points distributors anymore. With
both of my boats, I've gotten rid of the ignition points and gone with
HEI.

I installed Pertronix ignition kits in both. I really can't say they
initially start any easier, but after warm up, the engines kick right
off with very little effort. The performance is snappier, and I get a
lot better fuel per hr. I wouldn't go back to pioints distributors
if I had to.

On my 23' Marquis with the 5.7 GM (350 chevy) I'm even thinking on
going with an "MSD" (Multiple Discharge System) to see if I can add
even more spark performance. on cruise they don't do much, but under
load at 4000 rpm, I think the engine will perform better yet.

For no more than a MSD kit costs, It's at least worth a try.

Should have just broken down and purchased Mallory electronic
distributors. Cheap freakin' Republican.

jps

Both of my boat distributors are Mallory, and you tell me where I an
get a brand new Mallory electronic distributor for the price of a
Pertronix kit ($69.00!)

I'm glad you arn't running the world.....

Pinhead:

Send them to Mallory and they'll convert them for you for $100/unit.

Sucker.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Send them to Mallory and they'll convert them for you for $100/unit?

Far cry from $69.00 a piece for Pertronix. Conver them? I said NEW.
not converted.

Excellent economics!

And you call me a sucker.

You're a bigger fool than I thought.

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:


Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php

Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?

Parse this instead...
 

"HK" wrote in message
...

Herring just wants to be noticed. But since he really has nothing to add
to any conversation, he just sort of jumps up and down, like a little
puppy.



Trouble is...you know what those little puppies do on the floor...

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 11, 7:18 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jul 11, 10:52?am, "JimH" ask wrote:





"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

roups.com...

On Jul 11, 8:38?am, wrote:
On Jul 11, 4:31 am, Chuck Gould wrote:

We need to come together. It's time to stop blaming everything on
Clinton, for sure, and it's about time to start trying to fix,
together, anything that may have gone sideways under the present
Executive.

And if I answer your three questions, will you let me cross your
bridge? Sandy Berger made sure we will never know how much the
Clintons were involved, had knowledge of, or even told the Bush
administration. Specualate all you want, scream from the top of the
mountain that you beleive the Clintons to the end, then why did they
have to destroy documents, I specualte that they did not tell Bush
everything, but I won't stand on a stump and declare it "truth" beyond
doubt, and call anyone who does not agree, stupid...

????????????????????????????

Thanks for demonstrating my previous point, but beyond that I have no
idea why you would suggest I'm screaming from a mountaintop that I
"believe the Clintons to the end".

If jps isn't going to accomplish anything by "blaming" Bush and his
conservative supporters (and he isn't), what is to be accomplished by
"blaming" Clinton? Looks like I touched a nerve- sorry. Didn't mean to
put you into a defensive mode.

Hey Chuck.......what happened to your "No Politcal Postings" pledge? ;-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

My posting isn't political in any way. It's a request for jps to
*stop* confrontational political posting and an observation that the
rancor created by political posts is destructive. How the heck is that
political?
Does a statement that we should work together to try to solve common
problems serve only one side of the political spectrum? Darn tragic,
if that's the case.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You noted the problems attributed to the current administration, you
do not make mistakes like that.. c'mon Chuck, it was a troll...

Parse this instead...
 

In article , "JimH" ask
says...

Nice short reply :-)


Thanks. To the point and factual. I can give you some training on doing
so if you wish. ;-)

Chuck,

You really should jump at the chance. He can teach you the finer points
of netcoping for sure.

jps

Parse this instead...
 

In article .com,
says...
On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:


Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php

Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?

Why don't you have a little read and see what may have caused me to call
Bill O a ****ing cocksucker.

Could it be that he deserves it and that it's an accurate description?
Decide for yourself.

jps

Parse this instead...
 

In article .com,
says...
On Jul 11, 6:28 pm, jps wrote:
In article . com,
says...

jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

jps wrote:

Not even Fox (Republican talking points distributor) News would have the
gall to share your rich fantasy.

jps

I'm a republican and I don't talk points distributors anymore. With
both of my boats, I've gotten rid of the ignition points and gone with
HEI.

I installed Pertronix ignition kits in both. I really can't say they
initially start any easier, but after warm up, the engines kick right
off with very little effort. The performance is snappier, and I get a
lot better fuel per hr. I wouldn't go back to pioints distributors
if I had to.

On my 23' Marquis with the 5.7 GM (350 chevy) I'm even thinking on
going with an "MSD" (Multiple Discharge System) to see if I can add
even more spark performance. on cruise they don't do much, but under
load at 4000 rpm, I think the engine will perform better yet.

For no more than a MSD kit costs, It's at least worth a try.

Should have just broken down and purchased Mallory electronic
distributors. Cheap freakin' Republican.

jps

Both of my boat distributors are Mallory, and you tell me where I an
get a brand new Mallory electronic distributor for the price of a
Pertronix kit ($69.00!)

I'm glad you arn't running the world.....

Pinhead:

Send them to Mallory and they'll convert them for you for $100/unit.

Sucker.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Send them to Mallory and they'll convert them for you for $100/unit?

Far cry from $69.00 a piece for Pertronix. Conver them? I said NEW.
not converted.

Excellent economics!

And you call me a sucker.

You're a bigger fool than I thought.

You purchased a whole electronic distributor from Pertronix for $69?
Wrong. You purchased an upgrade kit.

BTW, I sent Mallory gently used, point-based units, they exchanged them
for new electronic. It cost me $100/unit. Repeat. They replaced them
with brand new units.

You just a little embarrassed that you weren't smart enough to do the
research? All it took was a call to Mallory. I would expect a sharp
"conservative" like you to check around before making a decision.

jps

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 11, 8:57 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:

Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php

Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?

Why don't you have a little read and see what may have caused me to call
Bill O a ****ing cocksucker.

Could it be that he deserves it and that it's an accurate description?
Decide for yourself.

jps

Hummmm, you link me to an opinon page, with no transcripts? I saw the
interview, which is convieniently omitted from the story, your link is
only hearsay and specualtion of what the writer thinks happened in the
Green room, taken from an intervies with only one side of the issue.
You don't have a problem with that? You automatically beleive it as if
it were fact, even though there are no facts to back it up? Again, you
fail to show me anything more than propoganda, probably sponsored by
networks and commentators who are loosing viewers in droves to Bill.

Parse this instead...
 

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:08:50 -0000,
wrote:

Simple, what do you think Sandy was protecting, you are obviously not
against speculation?

Look, they're all slimeballs. Clinton, Gore, Berger, Bush, Cheney.
Why take sides?
Here. Berger should have been tossed in prison.
Bush is in charge. It's his Justice Department.
Why wasn't Berger jailed?
There. I broke my rule about posting politics.
But I got fed up with all you commies supporting Clinton and Bush.

--Vic

Parse this instead...
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jul 11, 8:57 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:

Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php

Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?

Why don't you have a little read and see what may have caused me to call
Bill O a ****ing cocksucker.

Could it be that he deserves it and that it's an accurate description?
Decide for yourself.

jps

Hummmm, you link me to an opinon page, with no transcripts? I saw the
interview, which is convieniently omitted from the story, your link is
only hearsay and specualtion of what the writer thinks happened in the
Green room, taken from an intervies with only one side of the issue.
You don't have a problem with that? You automatically beleive it as if
it were fact, even though there are no facts to back it up? Again, you
fail to show me anything more than propoganda, probably sponsored by
networks and commentators who are loosing viewers in droves to Bill.


Ignore the troll. He only comes here to troll for political arguments.

Ignore him and he goes away..... ;-)

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 11, 8:11 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...





On Jul 11, 6:28 pm, jps wrote:
In article . com,
says...

jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

jps wrote:

Not even Fox (Republican talking points distributor) News would have the
gall to share your rich fantasy.

jps

I'm a republican and I don't talk points distributors anymore. With
both of my boats, I've gotten rid of the ignition points and gone with
HEI.

I installed Pertronix ignition kits in both. I really can't say they
initially start any easier, but after warm up, the engines kick right
off with very little effort. The performance is snappier, and I get a
lot better fuel per hr. I wouldn't go back to pioints distributors
if I had to.

On my 23' Marquis with the 5.7 GM (350 chevy) I'm even thinking on
going with an "MSD" (Multiple Discharge System) to see if I can add
even more spark performance. on cruise they don't do much, but under
load at 4000 rpm, I think the engine will perform better yet.

For no more than a MSD kit costs, It's at least worth a try.

Should have just broken down and purchased Mallory electronic
distributors. Cheap freakin' Republican.

jps

Both of my boat distributors are Mallory, and you tell me where I an
get a brand new Mallory electronic distributor for the price of a
Pertronix kit ($69.00!)

I'm glad you arn't running the world.....

Pinhead:

Send them to Mallory and they'll convert them for you for $100/unit.

Sucker.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Send them to Mallory and they'll convert them for you for $100/unit?

Far cry from $69.00 a piece for Pertronix. Conver them? I said NEW.
not converted.

Excellent economics!

And you call me a sucker.

You're a bigger fool than I thought.

You purchased a whole electronic distributor from Pertronix for $69?
Wrong. You purchased an upgrade kit.

BTW, I sent Mallory gently used, point-based units, they exchanged them
for new electronic. It cost me $100/unit. Repeat. They replaced them
with brand new units.

You just a little embarrassed that you weren't smart enough to do the
research? All it took was a call to Mallory. I would expect a sharp
"conservative" like you to check around before making a decision.

jps- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


So... they don't "convert" the distributors like you said, they
replace them with New, now like you are saying?

Where did I say I bought a NEW PERTRONIX distributor?

Nada

So, with your reasoning, I should take the distributor out, pack it,
ship it to Mallory, wait to get a "New," er, "converted" No... "NEW"
distributor, pay shipping back, re install, and retime. For about
$100.00 plus shiping and downtime.

yeah, that's a great idea when a Pertronix kit is practically a 15
minute drop-in installation (minus retiming)

"I would expect a sharp
"conservative" like you to check around before making a decision."

I've done enough reserch to know that the Pertronix kit is the better
and more economical way to go .

Thanks for the advice Goober. Maybe you should put a Mallory in
Andy's 1963 Ford Squad car. After all, it came with a Holley!

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 11, 7:57 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:

Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php

Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?

Why don't you have a little read and see what may have caused me to call
Bill O a ****ing cocksucker.

Could it be that he deserves it and that it's an accurate description?
Decide for yourself.

jps

Oh, so now you are proving that Bill is a homosexual? Or mabe he likes
to suck the blood from decapitated chickens AFTER he's penetrated them
for sex?

Parse this instead...
 

Tim wrote:
On Jul 11, 7:57 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:
Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...
http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php
Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?
Why don't you have a little read and see what may have caused me to call
Bill O a ****ing cocksucker.

Could it be that he deserves it and that it's an accurate description?
Decide for yourself.

jps

Oh, so now you are proving that Bill is a homosexual? Or mabe he likes
to suck the blood from decapitated chickens AFTER he's penetrated them
for sex?



Naw. Bill O is a run of the mill prevert who gets off calling girls who
are in the shower and asking them to rub themselves with loofahs. The
home is Rush, who went to the Dominican Republic with three other guys,
a bottle of Viagra and a case of K-Y.

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 11, 8:49 pm, HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Jul 11, 7:57 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:
Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...
http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php
Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?
Why don't you have a little read and see what may have caused me to call
Bill O a ****ing cocksucker.

Could it be that he deserves it and that it's an accurate description?
Decide for yourself.

jps

Oh, so now you are proving that Bill is a homosexual? Or mabe he likes
to suck the blood from decapitated chickens AFTER he's penetrated them
for sex?

Naw. Bill O is a run of the mill prevert who gets off calling girls who
are in the shower and asking them to rub themselves with loofahs. The
home is Rush, who went to the Dominican Republic with three other guys,
a bottle of Viagra and a case of K-Y.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

LOL!

good one, Harry!

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 11, 10:01 pm, Tim wrote:
On Jul 11, 8:49 pm, HK wrote:





Tim wrote:
On Jul 11, 7:57 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:
Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...
http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php
Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?
Why don't you have a little read and see what may have caused me to call
Bill O a ****ing cocksucker.

Could it be that he deserves it and that it's an accurate description?
Decide for yourself.

jps

Oh, so now you are proving that Bill is a homosexual? Or mabe he likes
to suck the blood from decapitated chickens AFTER he's penetrated them
for sex?

Naw. Bill O is a run of the mill prevert who gets off calling girls who
are in the shower and asking them to rub themselves with loofahs. The
home is Rush, who went to the Dominican Republic with three other guys,
a bottle of Viagra and a case of K-Y.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

LOL!

good one, Harry!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not so funny when you realize Harry was one of the three guys!

Parse this instead...
 

Tom Francis wrote:

...and Robert F. Kennedy's son, who grew hoarse from shouting. "This is
treason. And we need to start treating them as traitors."

He's the guy who thinks boats are bad.

He said that, "Boats are bad" ?

Parse this instead...
 

In article .com,
says...
On Jul 11, 8:57 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:

Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php

Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?

Why don't you have a little read and see what may have caused me to call
Bill O a ****ing cocksucker.

Could it be that he deserves it and that it's an accurate description?
Decide for yourself.

jps

Hummmm, you link me to an opinon page, with no transcripts? I saw the
interview, which is convieniently omitted from the story, your link is
only hearsay and specualtion of what the writer thinks happened in the
Green room, taken from an intervies with only one side of the issue.
You don't have a problem with that? You automatically beleive it as if
it were fact, even though there are no facts to back it up? Again, you
fail to show me anything more than propoganda, probably sponsored by
networks and commentators who are loosing viewers in droves to Bill.

What a laugh. Both he and Fox are losing viewers to networks who's
broadcasts more closely resemble actual news.

jps

Parse this instead...
 

In article . com,
says...
On Jul 11, 8:11 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...





On Jul 11, 6:28 pm, jps wrote:
In article . com,
says...

jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

jps wrote:

Not even Fox (Republican talking points distributor) News would have the
gall to share your rich fantasy.

jps

I'm a republican and I don't talk points distributors anymore. With
both of my boats, I've gotten rid of the ignition points and gone with
HEI.

I installed Pertronix ignition kits in both. I really can't say they
initially start any easier, but after warm up, the engines kick right
off with very little effort. The performance is snappier, and I get a
lot better fuel per hr. I wouldn't go back to pioints distributors
if I had to.

On my 23' Marquis with the 5.7 GM (350 chevy) I'm even thinking on
going with an "MSD" (Multiple Discharge System) to see if I can add
even more spark performance. on cruise they don't do much, but under
load at 4000 rpm, I think the engine will perform better yet.

For no more than a MSD kit costs, It's at least worth a try.

Should have just broken down and purchased Mallory electronic
distributors. Cheap freakin' Republican.

jps

Both of my boat distributors are Mallory, and you tell me where I an
get a brand new Mallory electronic distributor for the price of a
Pertronix kit ($69.00!)

I'm glad you arn't running the world.....

Pinhead:

Send them to Mallory and they'll convert them for you for $100/unit.

Sucker.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Send them to Mallory and they'll convert them for you for $100/unit?

Far cry from $69.00 a piece for Pertronix. Conver them? I said NEW.
not converted.

Excellent economics!

And you call me a sucker.

You're a bigger fool than I thought.

You purchased a whole electronic distributor from Pertronix for $69?
Wrong. You purchased an upgrade kit.

BTW, I sent Mallory gently used, point-based units, they exchanged them
for new electronic. It cost me $100/unit. Repeat. They replaced them
with brand new units.

You just a little embarrassed that you weren't smart enough to do the
research? All it took was a call to Mallory. I would expect a sharp
"conservative" like you to check around before making a decision.

jps- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


So... they don't "convert" the distributors like you said, they
replace them with New, now like you are saying?

Where did I say I bought a NEW PERTRONIX distributor?

Nada

So, with your reasoning, I should take the distributor out, pack it,
ship it to Mallory, wait to get a "New," er, "converted" No... "NEW"
distributor, pay shipping back, re install, and retime. For about
$100.00 plus shiping and downtime.

yeah, that's a great idea when a Pertronix kit is practically a 15
minute drop-in installation (minus retiming)

"I would expect a sharp
"conservative" like you to check around before making a decision."

I've done enough reserch to know that the Pertronix kit is the better
and more economical way to go .

Thanks for the advice Goober. Maybe you should put a Mallory in
Andy's 1963 Ford Squad car. After all, it came with a Holley!

The bodies are actually different pinhead. You've got a the body of a
points distributor.

Your update is for backyard mechanics who don't know any better.

Call Mallory and ask.

jps

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 12, 1:25 am, jps wrote:
In article . com,
says...





On Jul 11, 8:11 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

On Jul 11, 6:28 pm, jps wrote:
In article . com,
says...

jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

jps wrote:

Not even Fox (Republican talking points distributor) News would have the
gall to share your rich fantasy.

jps

I'm a republican and I don't talk points distributors anymore. With
both of my boats, I've gotten rid of the ignition points and gone with
HEI.

I installed Pertronix ignition kits in both. I really can't say they
initially start any easier, but after warm up, the engines kick right
off with very little effort. The performance is snappier, and I get a
lot better fuel per hr. I wouldn't go back to pioints distributors
if I had to.

On my 23' Marquis with the 5.7 GM (350 chevy) I'm even thinking on
going with an "MSD" (Multiple Discharge System) to see if I can add
even more spark performance. on cruise they don't do much, but under
load at 4000 rpm, I think the engine will perform better yet.

For no more than a MSD kit costs, It's at least worth a try.

Should have just broken down and purchased Mallory electronic
distributors. Cheap freakin' Republican.

jps

Both of my boat distributors are Mallory, and you tell me where I an
get a brand new Mallory electronic distributor for the price of a
Pertronix kit ($69.00!)

I'm glad you arn't running the world.....

Pinhead:

Send them to Mallory and they'll convert them for you for $100/unit.

Sucker.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Send them to Mallory and they'll convert them for you for $100/unit?

Far cry from $69.00 a piece for Pertronix. Conver them? I said NEW.
not converted.

Excellent economics!

And you call me a sucker.

You're a bigger fool than I thought.

You purchased a whole electronic distributor from Pertronix for $69?
Wrong. You purchased an upgrade kit.

BTW, I sent Mallory gently used, point-based units, they exchanged them
for new electronic. It cost me $100/unit. Repeat. They replaced them
with brand new units.

You just a little embarrassed that you weren't smart enough to do the
research? All it took was a call to Mallory. I would expect a sharp
"conservative" like you to check around before making a decision.

jps- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So... they don't "convert" the distributors like you said, they
replace them with New, now like you are saying?

Where did I say I bought a NEW PERTRONIX distributor?

Nada

So, with your reasoning, I should take the distributor out, pack it,
ship it to Mallory, wait to get a "New," er, "converted" No... "NEW"
distributor, pay shipping back, re install, and retime. For about
$100.00 plus shiping and downtime.

yeah, that's a great idea when a Pertronix kit is practically a 15
minute drop-in installation (minus retiming)

"I would expect a sharp
"conservative" like you to check around before making a decision."

I've done enough reserch to know that the Pertronix kit is the better
and more economical way to go .

Thanks for the advice Goober. Maybe you should put a Mallory in
Andy's 1963 Ford Squad car. After all, it came with a Holley!

The bodies are actually different pinhead. You've got a the body of a
points distributor.

Your update is for backyard mechanics who don't know any better.

Call Mallory and ask.

jps- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Is that the best yuo can do?

who cares what it looks like, "pinhead"

Function counts

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 12, 1:25 am, jps wrote:


Your update is for backyard mechanics who don't know any better.

Yeah, and I didn't even have to take it to a shop to update my points
distributor.

Call Mallory and ask.

Why?

jps-

Parse this instead...
 

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:23:05 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:08:51 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote:
I have noticed that
spoiled little children with no moral core can get you in a lot of
trouble in their ever constant self indulgence.


Indeed, look at all the trouble Cheney has caused with his
self-indulgent bull****.
Harry, did you get your computer fixed?":
--
John H

John... why are you always instigating trouble?
We know you don't boat any longer, but what about your golf proshop job?
Sell many tees?


Herring said he gave his boat to his kids, so he could pursue his dream
of adding "failed golfer" to his string of non-accomplishments.

Parse this instead...
 

jps wrote:
In article . com,
says...
On Jul 11, 8:11 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...





On Jul 11, 6:28 pm, jps wrote:
In article . com,
says...
jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...
jps wrote:
Not even Fox (Republican talking points distributor) News would have the
gall to share your rich fantasy.
jps
I'm a republican and I don't talk points distributors anymore. With
both of my boats, I've gotten rid of the ignition points and gone with
HEI.
I installed Pertronix ignition kits in both. I really can't say they
initially start any easier, but after warm up, the engines kick right
off with very little effort. The performance is snappier, and I get a
lot better fuel per hr. I wouldn't go back to pioints distributors
if I had to.
On my 23' Marquis with the 5.7 GM (350 chevy) I'm even thinking on
going with an "MSD" (Multiple Discharge System) to see if I can add
even more spark performance. on cruise they don't do much, but under
load at 4000 rpm, I think the engine will perform better yet.
For no more than a MSD kit costs, It's at least worth a try.
Should have just broken down and purchased Mallory electronic
distributors. Cheap freakin' Republican.
jps
Both of my boat distributors are Mallory, and you tell me where I an
get a brand new Mallory electronic distributor for the price of a
Pertronix kit ($69.00!)
I'm glad you arn't running the world.....
Pinhead:
Send them to Mallory and they'll convert them for you for $100/unit.
Sucker.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Send them to Mallory and they'll convert them for you for $100/unit?
Far cry from $69.00 a piece for Pertronix. Conver them? I said NEW.
not converted.
Excellent economics!
And you call me a sucker.
You're a bigger fool than I thought.
You purchased a whole electronic distributor from Pertronix for $69?
Wrong. You purchased an upgrade kit.

BTW, I sent Mallory gently used, point-based units, they exchanged them
for new electronic. It cost me $100/unit. Repeat. They replaced them
with brand new units.

You just a little embarrassed that you weren't smart enough to do the
research? All it took was a call to Mallory. I would expect a sharp
"conservative" like you to check around before making a decision.

jps- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So... they don't "convert" the distributors like you said, they
replace them with New, now like you are saying?

Where did I say I bought a NEW PERTRONIX distributor?

Nada

So, with your reasoning, I should take the distributor out, pack it,
ship it to Mallory, wait to get a "New," er, "converted" No... "NEW"
distributor, pay shipping back, re install, and retime. For about
$100.00 plus shiping and downtime.

yeah, that's a great idea when a Pertronix kit is practically a 15
minute drop-in installation (minus retiming)

"I would expect a sharp
"conservative" like you to check around before making a decision."

I've done enough reserch to know that the Pertronix kit is the better
and more economical way to go .

Thanks for the advice Goober. Maybe you should put a Mallory in
Andy's 1963 Ford Squad car. After all, it came with a Holley!

The bodies are actually different pinhead. You've got a the body of a
points distributor.

Your update is for backyard mechanics who don't know any better.

Call Mallory and ask.

jps

JOn,
Why all the animosity and anger towards the world? Chill out dude, you
will live longer.

Parse this instead...
 

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:23:05 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:08:51 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote:
I have noticed that
spoiled little children with no moral core can get you in a lot of
trouble in their ever constant self indulgence.



Indeed, look at all the trouble Cheney has caused with his
self-indulgent bull****.

Harry, did you get your computer fixed?":
--
John H


John... why are you always instigating trouble?
We know you don't boat any longer, but what about your golf proshop job?
Sell many tees?


Don, is Harry so sensitive that asking if his computer is fixed is an
instigation of trouble? If his computer wasn't broke, how would you account
for his continuous bragging about his killfile, yet responding directly to
my post?
--
John H

Parse this instead...
 

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:46:43 -0700, jps wrote:

In article .com,
says...


And now that I have had a chance to read some of these links, I see
nothing but what you have here on rec.boats. Lots of sensational
accusations, with nothing backing any of them up.. I am getting tired
of reading fairy stories.

Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php

O'REILLY: But who is this guy, really? Well, on this program, Glick
said President [George W.] Bush and his father [former President George
H.W. Bush] were responsible for his [Glick's] father's death. He said
George W. Bush pulled off a coup to get elected. He implied the U.S.A.
itself was a terrorist nation. And he called his father's death at the
hands of an Al Qaeda "alleged assassination." He said America itself was
responsible for the 9-11 attack because it is an imperialistic, aggressive
nation. Glick was dismissed from The Factor because he was completely off
the wall. Security actually had to take the guy out of the building, he was
that out of control.

Glick never said "President Bush and his father were responsible for his
[Glick's] father's death." What Glick did say, on the February 4, 2003,
edition of The O'Reilly Factor, was the following: "[O]ur current president
now inherited a legacy from his father and inherited a political legacy
that's responsible for training militarily, economically, and situating
geopolitically the parties involved in the alleged assassination and the
murder of my father and countless of thousands of others."

Isn't it strange that only *one* of the statements made by O'Reilly is
rebutted?

Now, how is that Whaler holding up? Do you find it to be a rough riding
boat?
--
John H

Parse this instead...
 

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:20:43 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...

Herring just wants to be noticed. But since he really has nothing to add
to any conversation, he just sort of jumps up and down, like a little
puppy.



Trouble is...you know what those little puppies do on the floor...


Gosh Don, I don't recall making any personal attacks on you lately. Why do
you find it necessary?

--
John H

Parse this instead...
 

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:23:05 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:08:51 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote:
I have noticed that
spoiled little children with no moral core can get you in a lot of
trouble in their ever constant self indulgence.



Indeed, look at all the trouble Cheney has caused with his
self-indulgent bull****.

Harry, did you get your computer fixed?":
--
John H


John... why are you always instigating trouble?
We know you don't boat any longer, but what about your golf proshop job?
Sell many tees?


Yes Don, I still own and operate my boat. You are believing too much of
what you read posted by JimH or HK. I'd think you knew better by now,
especially after you acknowledged this mistake earlier.
--
John H

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 12, 2:22 am, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...





On Jul 11, 8:57 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:

Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php

Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?

Why don't you have a little read and see what may have caused me to call
Bill O a ****ing cocksucker.

Could it be that he deserves it and that it's an accurate description?
Decide for yourself.

jps

Hummmm, you link me to an opinon page, with no transcripts? I saw the
interview, which is convieniently omitted from the story, your link is
only hearsay and specualtion of what the writer thinks happened in the
Green room, taken from an intervies with only one side of the issue.
You don't have a problem with that? You automatically beleive it as if
it were fact, even though there are no facts to back it up? Again, you
fail to show me anything more than propoganda, probably sponsored by
networks and commentators who are loosing viewers in droves to Bill.

What a laugh. Both he and Fox are losing viewers to networks who's
broadcasts more closely resemble actual news.

jps-

- Show quoted text -

OK, so you can't back up your statement about Bill with anything more
than straight lies, (saying Bill went off on gay gangs when it was
someone else, and it was corrected, in primetime) or third party
anecdotal stories by openly partizan groups and individuals (the
caption on the website you sent me to said "we watch fox so you don't
have to"), anything you are saying. You have shown no zero evidence of
Bill's lies.

Now, you are going to just skip on to the next dishonest "talking
point" about ratings, that of course you won't be able to prove
either.

You have proven without a doubt however that you are a foul mouthed
liar... Have a nice day, please man up and check your facts before
making any more of a fool of yourself...

Parse this instead...
 

wrote:
On Jul 12, 2:22 am, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...





On Jul 11, 8:57 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...
On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:
Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...
http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php
Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?
Why don't you have a little read and see what may have caused me to call
Bill O a ****ing cocksucker.
Could it be that he deserves it and that it's an accurate description?
Decide for yourself.
jps
Hummmm, you link me to an opinon page, with no transcripts? I saw the
interview, which is convieniently omitted from the story, your link is
only hearsay and specualtion of what the writer thinks happened in the
Green room, taken from an intervies with only one side of the issue.
You don't have a problem with that? You automatically beleive it as if
it were fact, even though there are no facts to back it up? Again, you
fail to show me anything more than propoganda, probably sponsored by
networks and commentators who are loosing viewers in droves to Bill.
What a laugh. Both he and Fox are losing viewers to networks who's
broadcasts more closely resemble actual news.

jps-

- Show quoted text -

OK, so you can't back up your statement about Bill with anything more
than straight lies, (saying Bill went off on gay gangs when it was
someone else, and it was corrected, in primetime) or third party
anecdotal stories by openly partizan groups and individuals (the
caption on the website you sent me to said "we watch fox so you don't
have to"), anything you are saying. You have shown no zero evidence of
Bill's lies.

Now, you are going to just skip on to the next dishonest "talking
point" about ratings, that of course you won't be able to prove
either.

You have proven without a doubt however that you are a foul mouthed
liar... Have a nice day, please man up and check your facts before
making any more of a fool of yourself...



I've wondered for some time what sort of retards watched O'rally and
actually believed him. Now I know.

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 12, 9:35 am, HK wrote:

I've wondered for some time what sort of retards watched O'rally and
actually believed him. Now I know.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Still no proof I see. I have always wondered what kind of a retard
would keep spouting the same old crap in a room full of folks who know
she is full of crap, now I know.

Parse this instead...
 

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 12, 10:05 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jul 12, 9:35 am, HK wrote:
I've wondered for some time what sort of retards watched O'rally and
actually believed him. Now I know.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Still no proof I see. I have always wondered what kind of a retard
would keep spouting the same old crap in a room full of folks who know
she is full of crap, now I know.

Proof of what? That O'Rally is a lying old fool who gets offs calling
young girls in showers and begging them to use a loofah? Even other
right-wing media types poke fun at him. He's a useless old fart with a
still large but declining audience of equally useless old farts.

It's dead Harry, you and JPS are liars. Like most ideologues, willing
to sell out for a little attention or power.

Parse this instead...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:20:43 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...

Herring just wants to be noticed. But since he really has nothing to add
to any conversation, he just sort of jumps up and down, like a little
puppy.



Trouble is...you know what those little puppies do on the floor...


Gosh Don, I don't recall making any personal attacks on you lately. Why do
you find it necessary?

--
John H

Since you gave up your self appointed sheriff position for your better
fitting 'instigator hat', I felt someone had to step up and try to maintain
order.

Parse this instead...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
Can you not attempt to maintain order without a personal attack?
--
John H



What have I said that you would consider 'a personal attack'?

Don't mention Dan... he doesn't count!

Parse this instead...
 

In article .com,
says...
On Jul 12, 10:05 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jul 12, 9:35 am, HK wrote:
I've wondered for some time what sort of retards watched O'rally and
actually believed him. Now I know.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Still no proof I see. I have always wondered what kind of a retard
would keep spouting the same old crap in a room full of folks who know
she is full of crap, now I know.

Proof of what? That O'Rally is a lying old fool who gets offs calling
young girls in showers and begging them to use a loofah? Even other
right-wing media types poke fun at him. He's a useless old fart with a
still large but declining audience of equally useless old farts.

It's dead Harry, you and JPS are liars. Like most ideologues, willing
to sell out for a little attention or power.

I noticed the only response from you of the four postings detailing the
outright lies and deceptions by Bill O garnered not a single response
other than me calling Bill O a cocksucker.

You asked for proof, I gave you proof. Burst your bubble little girl or
could you not bring yourself to read such blasphemy of your idol?

I think you've joined Bill O's cocksucking club.

jps

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 12, 12:34 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...





On Jul 12, 10:05 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jul 12, 9:35 am, HK wrote:
I've wondered for some time what sort of retards watched O'rally and
actually believed him. Now I know.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Still no proof I see. I have always wondered what kind of a retard
would keep spouting the same old crap in a room full of folks who know
she is full of crap, now I know.

Proof of what? That O'Rally is a lying old fool who gets offs calling
young girls in showers and begging them to use a loofah? Even other
right-wing media types poke fun at him. He's a useless old fart with a
still large but declining audience of equally useless old farts.

It's dead Harry, you and JPS are liars. Like most ideologues, willing
to sell out for a little attention or power.

I noticed the only response from you of the four postings detailing the
outright lies and deceptions by Bill O garnered not a single response
other than me calling Bill O a cocksucker.

You asked for proof, I gave you proof. Burst your bubble little girl or
could you not bring yourself to read such blasphemy of your idol?

I think you've joined Bill O's cocksucking club.

jps- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

First off I made several posts proving your information was wrong and
untruthful. I proved you were lied to about who said what about gay
gangs. I proved the source you trusted lied further by omitting the
conclusion and interview with Glaad. I read your link to the pundit
page with no more information or text proof than unsubstantiated
accusations, and ego boosting rants. I have proven again and again
your information is bogus, or you yourself are a liar, what more can I
do? I saw both interviews and commented on both, your above
accusation is just another lie. I realize you can't address the issues
at hand here, but come on.

Others commented exclusively on your juvenile use of language. You on
the other hand have brought not one fact to the discussion, only
second hand stories, name calling, and false accusations. Does that
not bother you that you are so ill informed?

And as far as calling me a little girl, I'm not. You really got
nothing to add, do you? I suppose you will, in the face of all the
facts, still spout your lies and that is the most disturbing thing
about all this. IRL I don't even talk to liars, as soon as you lie to
me, the conversation is over, period, ask my neighbor. If I can't
trust you, I have no need for you. so buh-bye...