wrote:

- Show quoted text -

First off I made several posts proving your information was wrong and
untruthful. I proved you were lied to about who said what about gay
gangs. I proved the source you trusted lied further by omitting the
conclusion and interview with Glaad.


The only thing that you've proved here is that you've allowed yourself
to be brainwashed by the thumblemongers on reich-wing hate radio and tv
news.

wrote:
If I can't
trust you, I have no need for you. so buh-bye...

Excellent decision.

HK wrote:
wrote:

- Show quoted text -

First off I made several posts proving your information was wrong and
untruthful. I proved you were lied to about who said what about gay
gangs. I proved the source you trusted lied further by omitting the
conclusion and interview with Glaad.


The only thing that you've proved here is that you've allowed yourself
to be brainwashed by the thumblemongers on reich-wing hate radio and tv
news.

Just,
Harry is dangling the bait, just ignore it, it will be as productive as
your conversation with jps.

On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:36:27 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:20:43 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...

Herring just wants to be noticed. But since he really has nothing to add
to any conversation, he just sort of jumps up and down, like a little
puppy.



Trouble is...you know what those little puppies do on the floor...


Gosh Don, I don't recall making any personal attacks on you lately. Why do
you find it necessary?

--
John H

Since you gave up your self appointed sheriff position for your better
fitting 'instigator hat', I felt someone had to step up and try to maintain
order.


Can you not attempt to maintain order without a personal attack?
--
John H

On Jul 12, 1:06 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:

- Show quoted text -

First off I made several posts proving your information was wrong and
untruthful. I proved you were lied to about who said what about gay
gangs. I proved the source you trusted lied further by omitting the
conclusion and interview with Glaad.

The only thing that you've proved here is that you've allowed yourself
to be brainwashed by the thumblemongers on reich-wing hate radio and tv
news.

Just,
Harry is dangling the bait, just ignore it, it will be as productive as
your conversation with jps.


Yeah, I know where I stand with Harry, he is having fun here like me.
Still welcome on my boat if he ever gets up this way. Well talk music
and fishin', I got a basement full of classical music, sure we can
avoid politics. Remember, I live in a blue state, most if not all of
my freinds are just a little left of Al Frankin, we have plenty of
other things to talk about...

On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:33:00 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
Can you not attempt to maintain order without a personal attack?
--
John H



What have I said that you would consider 'a personal attack'?

Don't mention Dan... he doesn't count!


Never mind, Don. You and Harry go well together. I wonder how he responded
directly to my 'filtered' post. Any ideas?
--
John H

In article .com,
says...
On Jul 12, 12:34 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...





On Jul 12, 10:05 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jul 12, 9:35 am, HK wrote:
I've wondered for some time what sort of retards watched O'rally and
actually believed him. Now I know.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Still no proof I see. I have always wondered what kind of a retard
would keep spouting the same old crap in a room full of folks who know
she is full of crap, now I know.

Proof of what? That O'Rally is a lying old fool who gets offs calling
young girls in showers and begging them to use a loofah? Even other
right-wing media types poke fun at him. He's a useless old fart with a
still large but declining audience of equally useless old farts.

It's dead Harry, you and JPS are liars. Like most ideologues, willing
to sell out for a little attention or power.

I noticed the only response from you of the four postings detailing the
outright lies and deceptions by Bill O garnered not a single response
other than me calling Bill O a cocksucker.

You asked for proof, I gave you proof. Burst your bubble little girl or
could you not bring yourself to read such blasphemy of your idol?

I think you've joined Bill O's cocksucking club.

jps- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

First off I made several posts proving your information was wrong and
untruthful. I proved you were lied to about who said what about gay
gangs. I proved the source you trusted lied further by omitting the
conclusion and interview with Glaad. I read your link to the pundit
page with no more information or text proof than unsubstantiated
accusations, and ego boosting rants. I have proven again and again
your information is bogus, or you yourself are a liar, what more can I
do? I saw both interviews and commented on both, your above
accusation is just another lie. I realize you can't address the issues
at hand here, but come on.

Others commented exclusively on your juvenile use of language. You on
the other hand have brought not one fact to the discussion, only
second hand stories, name calling, and false accusations. Does that
not bother you that you are so ill informed?

And as far as calling me a little girl, I'm not. You really got
nothing to add, do you? I suppose you will, in the face of all the
facts, still spout your lies and that is the most disturbing thing
about all this. IRL I don't even talk to liars, as soon as you lie to
me, the conversation is over, period, ask my neighbor. If I can't
trust you, I have no need for you. so buh-bye...

I posted 4 other links that were all valid, showing how Bill O lies and
twists to make his show more exciting. He cares nothing for facts, nor
do you.

Please refute the Olbermann piece I linked, refute the Reverend Bill
Moyers who has his own disappointing history with Bill O.

You may not talk to liars, you just worship them.

Wake up dimwit!

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:33:00 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
. ..
Can you not attempt to maintain order without a personal attack?
--
John H



What have I said that you would consider 'a personal attack'?

Don't mention Dan... he doesn't count!


Never mind, Don. You and Harry go well together. I wonder how he responded
directly to my 'filtered' post. Any ideas?
--
John H



I'm concerned for you JohnH.
Please go sign up for another 'Mickey Mouse/Goofy' cruise. I'm sure it'll
help sooth your jangled nerves.

Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:33:00 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
Can you not attempt to maintain order without a personal attack?
--
John H


What have I said that you would consider 'a personal attack'?

Don't mention Dan... he doesn't count!

Never mind, Don. You and Harry go well together. I wonder how he responded
directly to my 'filtered' post. Any ideas?
--
John H



I'm concerned for you JohnH.
Please go sign up for another 'Mickey Mouse/Goofy' cruise. I'm sure it'll
help sooth your jangled nerves.



Why isn't herring out licking golfer balls?

"HK" wrote in message
...

Why isn't herring out licking golfer balls?

I imagine he's only allowed out of the back room after dark.
Most golf courses try to promote an upscale image.