| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:39:18 GMT, "RG" wrote:
And besides, Corel is Canadian, which is reason enough to avoid them. Intersting take - I gather your not familiar with the history of PSP. It was the original digital photo manipulation software. In fact, many of the features of what eventually became Adobe Photoshop were lifted almost directly from PSP. It's been around since 1992 and is cross platform for Mac and Windows. And it's still the only software available under $100 that handles both vector and raster manipulation. It's every bit as capable as Adobe and in some ways, better. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:39:18 GMT, "RG" wrote: And besides, Corel is Canadian, which is reason enough to avoid them. Intersting take - I gather your not familiar with the history of PSP. Nope. It was the original digital photo manipulation software. In fact, many of the features of what eventually became Adobe Photoshop were lifted almost directly from PSP. It's been around since 1992 and is cross platform for Mac and Windows. Sounds very much like the history of CorelDRAW. And it's still the only software available under $100 that handles both vector and raster manipulation. How or why would you use vector manipulation in pixel-based photo editing? I believe Elements uses vector manipulation when you ask it to build frames around your photos and silly stuff like that, but I don't understand where vector manipulation would come into play in the actual editing process. Can you assist? It's every bit as capable as Adobe and in some ways, better. As I said earlier, the issue for me isn't about capability. I assume both are capable. WordPerfect is a capable word processor and QuatroPro is a capable spreadsheet. I just wouldn't use them over Word or Excel. When it comes to software, I believe in using products that dominate their market in terms of user base. It's one of the reasons I don't use a Mac, which is just as capable as a PC and in some ways, better. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 4, 9:01 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:39:18 GMT, "RG" wrote: And besides, Corel is Canadian, which is reason enough to avoid them. Intersting take - I gather your not familiar with the history of PSP. It was the original digital photo manipulation software. In fact, many of the features of what eventually became Adobe Photoshop were lifted almost directly from PSP. It's been around since 1992 and is cross platform for Mac and Windows. And it's still the only software available under $100 that handles both vector and raster manipulation. It's every bit as capable as Adobe and in some ways, better. Wow, I remember when PSP was from Jasc, we had one of the earliest versions. Used Corel for a while too, the mrs. did a 3d fish tank thing, maybe I can find it, prett cool. We did a couple of fliers for a retirement home with PSP too, made a watercolor rendition of the building and grounds. Had the 4 color seperations done and they have been using it ever since. Still use PSP for everything digital though. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|