On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:37:24 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:42:23 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


Look: You pursued a conversation as if you knew what you were talking
about,
and it reached the point where you were inventing theories and using words
that made no sense. When you finally realized this, you decided to set
your
hair on fire in two ways: You asked for my qualifications, and then said
something about lightweight education, or whatever your words were. The
absurdity of your approach is obvious. By way of analogy, you believe that
although Tom can probably put people on a school of fish with a high
degree
of success because he's been fishing the same region forever, he is not
qualified. You're also suggesting that his qualifications are identical to
those of a boater who drops a hook in the water once every two or nine
years.

That's just plain silly.

None of this matters, though, since it in no way addresses the experiment
in
the newspaper article, which you still haven't read.


Don't you just love being able to read minds, to know what others know, to
know what they're inventing, to know when they realize and when they
decide, to know what they believe, and even what they've read?

Omniscience is great, isn't it?
--
John H

Would you agree that some plants lose their leaves in winter?


Why would one who is omniscient *ever* ask a question?
--
John H