![]() |
|
Hey!! Look!! It's an On Topic Post!!!
I just returned from the local coffee shop where I ran into a Federal
high level bureaucrat who mentioned it to me off hand as part of the conversation about my boating plans for the summer. Chuck posted that deal last week about transponders for small craft as the next great issue facing boaters? Apparently, Homeland Security is dead serious about the proposal as well as requiring a personal document, such as a photo id/license for ALL boaters - not just those with higher powered boats or high speed boats. At the moment, the proposal only affects areas where there are high security concerns - like New London Harbor for example, or for boat transiting areas of security concern - eventually it will reach every boater in some way or fashion. The cost of the transponders will, of course, be paid for by the boaters. |
Hey!! Look!! It's an On Topic Post!!!
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
I just returned from the local coffee shop where I ran into a Federal high level bureaucrat who mentioned it to me off hand as part of the conversation about my boating plans for the summer. Chuck posted that deal last week about transponders for small craft as the next great issue facing boaters? Apparently, Homeland Security is dead serious about the proposal as well as requiring a personal document, such as a photo id/license for ALL boaters - not just those with higher powered boats or high speed boats. At the moment, the proposal only affects areas where there are high security concerns - like New London Harbor for example, or for boat transiting areas of security concern - eventually it will reach every boater in some way or fashion. The cost of the transponders will, of course, be paid for by the boaters. That high level bureaucrat, no doubt, was assigned to follow you and slip a small, tasteless transponder into your coffee. I have it on the highest authority that the feds want to know your whereabouts at all times. |
Hey!! Look!! It's an On Topic Post!!!
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:13:16 -0400, HK wrote:
That high level bureaucrat, no doubt, was assigned to follow you and slip a small, tasteless transponder into your coffee. I have it on the highest authority that the feds want to know your whereabouts at all times. They even have a callsign for me. Superman. :) |
Hey!! Look!! It's an On Topic Post!!!
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:13:16 -0400, HK wrote: That high level bureaucrat, no doubt, was assigned to follow you and slip a small, tasteless transponder into your coffee. I have it on the highest authority that the feds want to know your whereabouts at all times. They even have a callsign for me. Superman. :) Noe if I was nasty... like some of those characters you mentioned on the weekend, I might suggest that you forgot the 't' in your "Superman" ;-) |
Hey!! Look!! It's an On Topic Post!!!
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:59:49 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:13:16 -0400, HK wrote: That high level bureaucrat, no doubt, was assigned to follow you and slip a small, tasteless transponder into your coffee. I have it on the highest authority that the feds want to know your whereabouts at all times. They even have a callsign for me. Superman. :) Noe if I was nasty... like some of those characters you mentioned on the weekend, I might suggest that you forgot the 't' in your "Superman" ;-) Ah - see, now I'll have to report you to the CIA. That's my other call sign. :) |
Hey!! Look!! It's an On Topic Post!!!
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:59:49 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:13:16 -0400, HK wrote: That high level bureaucrat, no doubt, was assigned to follow you and slip a small, tasteless transponder into your coffee. I have it on the highest authority that the feds want to know your whereabouts at all times. They even have a callsign for me. Superman. :) Noe if I was nasty... like some of those characters you mentioned on the weekend, I might suggest that you forgot the 't' in your "Superman" ;-) Ah - see, now I'll have to report you to the CIA. That's my other call sign. :) Culinary Institute of America? |
Hey!! Look!! It's an On Topic Post!!!
"HK" wrote in message ... Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:59:49 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:13:16 -0400, HK wrote: That high level bureaucrat, no doubt, was assigned to follow you and slip a small, tasteless transponder into your coffee. I have it on the highest authority that the feds want to know your whereabouts at all times. They even have a callsign for me. Superman. :) Noe if I was nasty... like some of those characters you mentioned on the weekend, I might suggest that you forgot the 't' in your "Superman" ;-) Ah - see, now I'll have to report you to the CIA. That's my other call sign. :) Culinary Institute of America? Did Mrs. Wave sign him up? |
Hey!! Look!! It's an On Topic Post!!!
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
... I just returned from the local coffee shop where I ran into a Federal high level bureaucrat who mentioned it to me off hand as part of the conversation about my boating plans for the summer. Chuck posted that deal last week about transponders for small craft as the next great issue facing boaters? Apparently, Homeland Security is dead serious about the proposal as well as requiring a personal document, such as a photo id/license for ALL boaters - not just those with higher powered boats or high speed boats. At the moment, the proposal only affects areas where there are high security concerns - like New London Harbor for example, or for boat transiting areas of security concern - eventually it will reach every boater in some way or fashion. The cost of the transponders will, of course, be paid for by the boaters. Are these required on small private airplanes, or optional? |
Hey!! Look!! It's an On Topic Post!!!
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... Are these required on small private airplanes, or optional? Required, and have been, predateing 9/11 for many years. Eisboch |
Hey!! Look!! It's an On Topic Post!!!
"RCE" wrote in message
... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... Are these required on small private airplanes, or optional? Required, and have been, predateing 9/11 for many years. Eisboch Well, I guess we boaters are about to get lumped into a similar requirement. But, if it's any bigger than a walkie talkie, they're gonna have to buy me a bigger boat, because I am out of space for any more toys. :) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:39 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com