Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 07:27:27 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: Marketing. Bigger engines are extra cost options. I believe the "standard" engine for the Dauntless was a 90 hp Merc. The 115 hp (max hp for that hull) was an option. I thought of that, but it would seem to me if you were building a boat to perform at a certain level, then installing an engine in the middle of the acceptable range would be preferable to an engine at the lower end of the range. Plus, if you are building a boat to sell, wouldn't it make more sense to install an engine that would actually make the boat perform better from the git go? You would think so, but just like plain jane cars, the initial advertised price draws in the customer. Also, as you have recently discovered, most boat manufacturers have deals with engine manufacturers. The engine guys want to sell as many engines of all sizes that they can. Having a particular hull that will perform at different levels with a range of engines increases the sales of the entire product line. Some engine manufacturers ... I think it was Yamaha if I am not mistaken ... will even buy the rights to a boat name and setup a boat manufacturing facility ... in this case Century .... just as a platform for the sale of their engines. Eisboch |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:48:35 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: Some engine manufacturers ... I think it was Yamaha if I am not mistaken ... will even buy the rights to a boat name and setup a boat manufacturing facility ... in this case Century .... just as a platform for the sale of their engines. Yamaha also owns GIII boats - aluminum bass/fishing boats - same deal. Entry level boats. Bombardier tried it with their Fish Hawk line which was basically a platform for the redesigned FICHT. They were built by Hydra-Sports and side-by-side, you couldn't tell a Fish Hawk from the same model Hydra-Sports except for the paint/logos - they were identical. For some reason when they introduced the ETEC line, they abandoned Fish Hawk (after two model years) which left them as a OEM engine provider only - no platform for the ETECS. Yamaha has exclusive deals with a bunch of manufacturers - it gets a little weird when you try and price a boat/trailer only and get a rash of nonsense about all the reasons why they can't sell you a boat. It's really odd. I've spent some time on the phone with some manufacturers just trying to get my point across - I'd like to price out one of your boats without an engine/controls/gauges - cash. Your dealers won't work with me, can I work with you and they don't want anything to do with it. The interesting thing is that I've gotten better results from those dealers aligned with Mercury engine/boat combinations than those with Yamaha. However, the prices they quote don't discount for the lack of an engine, so that isn't any advantage. I'm seriously thinking of getting into the used market. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Team Sailfish 198 | General | |||
Team Sailfish 198 | General | |||
2002 - 154 Sailfish CC Boat | General | |||
AMF Sailfish Hull Construction | General | |||
fuel use for sailboats | Cruising |