Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Gould wrote:
Everybody has a different level of dedication to the pastime, and that's fine. There are a few people who feel that the last thing in life they would ever give up would be boating, no matter what the costs or other sacrifices required. On the other end of the scale there are folks who might go out in a boat if somebody offered them a ride, but certainly wouldn't pay for the experience..... Most eveybody else is somewhere in between. A high percentage will probably spend $100 per weekend to boat. Move that to $200, and there will be some dropouts. Move it to $300, and the crowd would begin to thin considerably. Every hundred bucks higher will accelerate the attrition rate. There's no cost level at which eveybody will instantly give up boating, but we only need to look around to see that at each increment of increased cost we lose a few more folks who cannot (or choose not to) afford it. Perhaps there's a category of boaters who can afford the petrol prices but who simply don't want to bend over so the oil companies can shove it up there. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 29, 11:48?am, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote: Everybody has a different level of dedication to the pastime, and that's fine. There are a few people who feel that the last thing in life they would ever give up would be boating, no matter what the costs or other sacrifices required. On the other end of the scale there are folks who might go out in a boat if somebody offered them a ride, but certainly wouldn't pay for the experience..... Most eveybody else is somewhere in between. A high percentage will probably spend $100 per weekend to boat. Move that to $200, and there will be some dropouts. Move it to $300, and the crowd would begin to thin considerably. Every hundred bucks higher will accelerate the attrition rate. There's no cost level at which eveybody will instantly give up boating, but we only need to look around to see that at each increment of increased cost we lose a few more folks who cannot (or choose not to) afford it. Perhaps there's a category of boaters who can afford the petrol prices but who simply don't want to bend over so the oil companies can shove it up there.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But those folks will continue to drive, fly, heat/cool their homes and swimming pools. We're fairly well screwed down by the oil companies, and giving up a part of ones personal enjoyment just to "show 'em" makes about as much sense as not buying gas on May 15 each year. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Gould wrote:
On May 29, 11:48?am, HK wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: Everybody has a different level of dedication to the pastime, and that's fine. There are a few people who feel that the last thing in life they would ever give up would be boating, no matter what the costs or other sacrifices required. On the other end of the scale there are folks who might go out in a boat if somebody offered them a ride, but certainly wouldn't pay for the experience..... Most eveybody else is somewhere in between. A high percentage will probably spend $100 per weekend to boat. Move that to $200, and there will be some dropouts. Move it to $300, and the crowd would begin to thin considerably. Every hundred bucks higher will accelerate the attrition rate. There's no cost level at which eveybody will instantly give up boating, but we only need to look around to see that at each increment of increased cost we lose a few more folks who cannot (or choose not to) afford it. Perhaps there's a category of boaters who can afford the petrol prices but who simply don't want to bend over so the oil companies can shove it up there.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But those folks will continue to drive, fly, heat/cool their homes and swimming pools. We're fairly well screwed down by the oil companies, and giving up a part of ones personal enjoyment just to "show 'em" makes about as much sense as not buying gas on May 15 each year. It is very easy to give up boating, when you only boat 1 day a year. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Gould wrote:
On May 29, 11:48?am, HK wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: Everybody has a different level of dedication to the pastime, and that's fine. There are a few people who feel that the last thing in life they would ever give up would be boating, no matter what the costs or other sacrifices required. On the other end of the scale there are folks who might go out in a boat if somebody offered them a ride, but certainly wouldn't pay for the experience..... Most eveybody else is somewhere in between. A high percentage will probably spend $100 per weekend to boat. Move that to $200, and there will be some dropouts. Move it to $300, and the crowd would begin to thin considerably. Every hundred bucks higher will accelerate the attrition rate. There's no cost level at which eveybody will instantly give up boating, but we only need to look around to see that at each increment of increased cost we lose a few more folks who cannot (or choose not to) afford it. Perhaps there's a category of boaters who can afford the petrol prices but who simply don't want to bend over so the oil companies can shove it up there.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But those folks will continue to drive, fly, heat/cool their homes and swimming pools. We're fairly well screwed down by the oil companies, and giving up a part of ones personal enjoyment just to "show 'em" makes about as much sense as not buying gas on May 15 each year. Just keep on waving that white flag, Chuckster. Some who can afford what they want are driving and flying less, using less air conditioning, and letting the sun heat our pools. Putting the screws to Big Oil can be an act of patriotism. "We can't do nuttin', so let's keep on keeping on..." I've been out boating seven times since the beginning of the season here this year. I'm keeping a very close eye on fuel consumption and operating so as to use as little as possible. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message ... Chuck Gould wrote: On May 29, 11:48?am, HK wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: Everybody has a different level of dedication to the pastime, and that's fine. There are a few people who feel that the last thing in life they would ever give up would be boating, no matter what the costs or other sacrifices required. On the other end of the scale there are folks who might go out in a boat if somebody offered them a ride, but certainly wouldn't pay for the experience..... Most eveybody else is somewhere in between. A high percentage will probably spend $100 per weekend to boat. Move that to $200, and there will be some dropouts. Move it to $300, and the crowd would begin to thin considerably. Every hundred bucks higher will accelerate the attrition rate. There's no cost level at which eveybody will instantly give up boating, but we only need to look around to see that at each increment of increased cost we lose a few more folks who cannot (or choose not to) afford it. Perhaps there's a category of boaters who can afford the petrol prices but who simply don't want to bend over so the oil companies can shove it up there.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But those folks will continue to drive, fly, heat/cool their homes and swimming pools. We're fairly well screwed down by the oil companies, and giving up a part of ones personal enjoyment just to "show 'em" makes about as much sense as not buying gas on May 15 each year. Just keep on waving that white flag, Chuckster. Some who can afford what they want are driving and flying less, using less air conditioning, and letting the sun heat our pools. Putting the screws to Big Oil can be an act of patriotism. "We can't do nuttin', so let's keep on keeping on..." I've been out boating seven times since the beginning of the season here this year. I'm keeping a very close eye on fuel consumption and operating so as to use as little as possible. The big boats were comfortably tied to their respective docks when we traveled down the Vermilion River yesterday. I also counted about a dozen of those boats with "For Sale" signs on them. There were, however, many boats running up and down the river in the 17'~27' range, with the fishing spots on the Lake filled with boats of that size. Gas on the river was going for $3.79 on average. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 29 May 2007 18:18:28 -0400, HK wrote:
I've been out boating seven times since the beginning of the season here this year. That's what I mean about you having the funniest lines! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cant get fuel pump to prime after changing fuel filter | General | |||
(non-political) comments on fuel economy and technology | General | |||
Gas Hog Cars, same phenomenon as boats | General | |||
Let there be heat! | General | |||
fuel delivery problem on outboard? help | General |