TNB: Raping Negro Goes A-Courting
 

On May 26, 12:42 pm, Ima Smellynig wrote:
Ex-UC player pleads not guilty
THE ENQUIRER
E-mail | Print | digg us! | del.icio.us!

Milwaukee Bucks basketball player Ruben Patterson, a convicted sex
offender, pleaded not guilty Friday in Hamilton County Municipal Court to
a misdemeanor charge of failing to register his address.

Patterson, a former University of Cincinnati basketball star, is accused
of failing to notify Hamilton County Sheriff's Office he moved to Indian
Hill in November, as he is required by law to do. Since being charged
earlier this month, Patterson has registered, according to the Hamilton
County Sheriff's Office.

Patterson was convicted in May 2001 in King County, Wash., on a
misdemeanor charge of attempted rape, records show. The charge alleges he
attacked a nanny who worked for his family.

Patterson was designated a sexually oriented offender and is required for
10 years to register his address with the sheriff's office in the county
in which he lives.

The failure-to-register charge carries a possible sentence of up to six
months in jail.

Patterson will appear in court June 8.

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.d...70526/NEWS01/7...

Professional sports has become heaven for savage negro criminals.
These crimes
were simply not committed when teams were White. Thus again, P.T.
Barnums
famous comment: "You will never lose money underestimating the
public's taste".

For more on negro crime in sports:

http://www.newnation.com/ New Nation News

ted

TNB: Raping Negro Goes A-Courting
 

"Ted" wrote in message
oups.com...

The failure-to-register charge carries a possible sentence of up to six
months in jail.

Patterson will appear in court June 8.


How did that work out?

.
 

On May 26, 5:36?pm, Ted wrote:
On May 26, 12:42 pm, Ima Smellynig wrote:





Ex-UC player pleads not guilty
THE ENQUIRER
E-mail | Print | digg us! | del.icio.us!

Milwaukee Bucks basketball player Ruben Patterson, a convicted sex
offender, pleaded not guilty Friday in Hamilton County Municipal Court to
a misdemeanor charge of failing to register his address.

Patterson, a former University of Cincinnati basketball star, is accused
of failing to notify Hamilton County Sheriff's Office he moved to Indian
Hill in November, as he is required by law to do. Since being charged
earlier this month, Patterson has registered, according to the Hamilton
County Sheriff's Office.

Patterson was convicted in May 2001 in King County, Wash., on a
misdemeanor charge of attempted rape, records show. The charge alleges he
attacked a nanny who worked for his family.

Patterson was designated a sexually oriented offender and is required for
10 years to register his address with the sheriff's office in the county
in which he lives.

The failure-to-register charge carries a possible sentence of up to six
months in jail.

Patterson will appear in court June 8.

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.d...70526/NEWS01/7...

Professional sports has become heaven for savage negro criminals.
These crimes
were simply not committed when teams were White. Thus again, P.T.
Barnums
famous comment: "You will never lose money underestimating the
public's taste".

For more on negro crime in sports:

http://www.newnation.com/ New Nation News

ted- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

.
 

On Jun 8, 12:22?am, "Mark Mathu" wrote:
"Ted" wrote in message

oups.com...

The failure-to-register charge carries a possible sentence of up to six
months in jail.

Patterson will appear in court June 8.

How did that work out?

.
 

"Chuck Gould" wrote
.

Hey Chuck,
That was profound statement ( insert Chucky dot here)

.
 

On Jun 8, 6:34?am, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:30:38 -0700, Chuck Gould

wrote:
On May 26, 5:36?pm, Ted wrote:
On May 26, 12:42 pm, Ima Smellynig wrote:

Okay, Chuck. We already know you are a complete asshole without you
pointing it out. It would also be most considerate of you if you would
refrain from re-posting spam. That way, the rest of us who are capable
of maintaining spam filters don't have to see this ****.

CWM

Thanks, Charlie. Being a "complete asshole" by your standards is a
compliment. If you're so adept with filters, please include me in your
list of filtered posters. Simple solution, wouldn't you think? If you
don't want to read "spam", it's also fairly certain that you wouldn't
want to read posts by "complete assholes."

.
 

On Jun 8, 6:41?am, "Jim" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote
.

Hey Chuck,
That was profound statement ( insert Chucky dot here)

Simply picking up the trash.

Heck, the original message is still there for the hordes of folks who
drop into rec.boats every day to read the latest white supremicist and
KKKrap.

If it ****es off a few people because munging the title interferes
with the dissemination of something they consider an important part of
their personal philosophy, too darn bad.

Tell you what, Jim.....the next time I launch a thread titled "The
Cheney/Bush Lie continues to cost us some of our best and brightest",
or something similar that reflects my personal, left wing view of the
world, you or anybody else from the opposite edge of the spectrum is
welcome to "dot" the title on the subject list. I'll fully deserve it.

Meanwhile, since I'm going to take crap from you no matter what I post
I might as well take crap for munging the title of a racist thread.

And, if it bothers you so much- why not simply edit the title back to
the original? Is it because you'd rather have something to bitch about
than take 10 seconds to restore something you think is important?

.
 

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
Tell you what, Jim.....the next time I launch a thread titled "The
Cheney/Bush Lie continues to cost us some of our best and brightest",

Better check with Harry before you launch this one (Chucky dot)

.
 

On Jun 8, 7:15?am, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:04:03 -0700, Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Jun 8, 6:34?am, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:30:38 -0700, Chuck Gould

wrote:
On May 26, 5:36?pm, Ted wrote:
On May 26, 12:42 pm, Ima Smellynig wrote:

Okay, Chuck. We already know you are a complete asshole without you
pointing it out. It would also be most considerate of you if you would
refrain from re-posting spam. That way, the rest of us who are capable
of maintaining spam filters don't have to see this ****.

CWM

Thanks, Charlie. Being a "complete asshole" is a
major promotion for me. My mom and dad would be so proud to
know that I've grown up to be just like them.

You're welcome.

CWM- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What sort of twisted jerk resorts to posting false quotes from another
poster and *then* stoops to insulting somebody's parents?

Oh, it looks like we have the answer.

Congrats, Charlie. Calling somebody's parents "assholes" is one of the
all time lows for the NG.

.
 

On Jun 8, 7:37?am, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:30:27 -0700, Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Jun 8, 7:15?am, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:04:03 -0700, Chuck Gould

wrote:
On Jun 8, 6:34?am, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:30:38 -0700, Chuck Gould

wrote:
On May 26, 5:36?pm, Ted wrote:
On May 26, 12:42 pm, Ima Smellynig wrote:

Okay, Chuck. We already know you are a complete asshole without you
pointing it out. It would also be most considerate of you if you would
refrain from re-posting spam. That way, the rest of us who are capable
of maintaining spam filters don't have to see this ****.

CWM

Thanks, Charlie. Being a "complete asshole" is a
major promotion for me. My mom and dad would be so proud to
know that I've grown up to be just like them.

You're welcome.

CWM- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What sort of twisted jerk resorts to posting false quotes from another
poster and *then* stoops to insulting somebody's parents?

Oh, it looks like we have the answer.

Congrats, Charlie. Calling somebody's parents "assholes" is one of the
all time lows for the NG.

It might have been if it wasn't true.

CWM- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you claiming to know my parents? They're two of the most God-
fearing, polite, and conservative folks you might ever be lucky enough
to meet. Like a lot of us, I probably have better parents than I
deserve.

If you were a man you'd apologize. I don't give much of a hoot about
the fact that you posted a statement that I didn't write and
attributed it to me, that's just par for your particular nasty,
hateful, and dishonest course in life.

To label my parents "complete assholes" and then, when challenged,
insist once again that it is true is indeed new low for rec.boats. Not
one of the sicko flamers in the long parade that precedes you in this
endeavor has ever stooped to such a depth. Congrats, Charlie, you have
carried the standard to a new and all time low.

.
 

On Jun 8, 7:24?am, "Jim" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...

Tell you what, Jim.....the next time I launch a thread titled "The
Cheney/Bush Lie continues to cost us some of our best and brightest",

Better check with Harry before you launch this one (Chucky dot)

And if it bothers you so much, why not simply edit the title back to
the original, racist thread. Is it because the KKK post is less
important to you than having something to bitch about?

.
 

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jun 8, 7:24?am, "Jim" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...

Tell you what, Jim.....the next time I launch a thread titled "The
Cheney/Bush Lie continues to cost us some of our best and brightest",

Better check with Harry before you launch this one (Chucky dot)

And if it bothers you so much, why not simply edit the title back to
the original, racist thread. Is it because the KKK post is less
important to you than having something to bitch about?

Yes it is (Chucky dot)

.
 

On Jun 8, 8:12?am, "Jim" wrote:

And if it bothers you so much, why not simply edit the title back to
the original, racist thread. Is it because the KKK post is less
important to you than having something to bitch about?

Yes it is (Chucky dot)

At least you're more honest than your fellow critic in this thread..

.
 

On Jun 8, 8:03?am, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:56:12 -0700, Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Jun 8, 7:37?am, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:30:27 -0700, Chuck Gould

wrote:
On Jun 8, 7:15?am, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:04:03 -0700, Chuck Gould

wrote:
On Jun 8, 6:34?am, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:30:38 -0700, Chuck Gould

wrote:
On May 26, 5:36?pm, Ted wrote:
On May 26, 12:42 pm, Ima Smellynig wrote:

Okay, Chuck. We already know you are a complete asshole without you
pointing it out. It would also be most considerate of you if you would
refrain from re-posting spam. That way, the rest of us who are capable
of maintaining spam filters don't have to see this ****.

CWM

Thanks, Charlie. Being a "complete asshole" is a
major promotion for me. My mom and dad would be so proud to
know that I've grown up to be just like them.

You're welcome.

CWM- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What sort of twisted jerk resorts to posting false quotes from another
poster and *then* stoops to insulting somebody's parents?

Oh, it looks like we have the answer.

Congrats, Charlie. Calling somebody's parents "assholes" is one of the
all time lows for the NG.

It might have been if it wasn't true.

CWM- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you claiming to know my parents? They're two of the most God-
fearing, polite, and conservative folks you might ever be lucky enough
to meet. Like a lot of us, I probably have better parents than I
deserve.

If you were a man you'd apologize. I don't give much of a hoot about
the fact that you posted a statement that I didn't write and
attributed it to me, that's just par for your particular nasty,
hateful, and dishonest course in life.

To label my parents "complete assholes" and then, when challenged,
insist once again that it is true is indeed new low for rec.boats. Not
one of the sicko flamers in the long parade that precedes you in this
endeavor has ever stooped to such a depth. Congrats, Charlie, you have
carried the standard to a new and all time low.

I'm not the one who changes subject lines an then reposts racist
trash. Your parents must really be scum to have a racist asshole like
you for a son.

CWM- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'll bet your parents are very proud of you, Charlie.

.
 

Trolling is an practice of long standing. Why are all of you tugging
on the line?

.
 

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:18:34 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote:

On Jun 8, 8:12?am, "Jim" wrote:

And if it bothers you so much, why not simply edit the title back to
the original, racist thread. Is it because the KKK post is less
important to you than having something to bitch about?

Yes it is (Chucky dot)

At least you're more honest than your fellow critic in this thread..


Chuck's mother ......................
CWM

What the hell is wrong with you?

.
 

On Jun 8, 11:26 am, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:18:34 -0700, Chuck Gould

wrote:
On Jun 8, 8:12?am, "Jim" wrote:

And if it bothers you so much, why not simply edit the title back to
the original, racist thread. Is it because the KKK post is less
important to you than having something to bitch about?

Yes it is (Chucky dot)

At least you're more honest than your fellow critic in this thread..

Chuck's mother sucks wet green donkey dick. The video is circulating
all over the internet.

CWM

And here I thought JimH was the best here at saying nasty, crude and
untrue things about people and their families.

.
 

On Jun 8, 10:30 am, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jun 8, 7:15?am, Charlie Morgan wrote:





On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:04:03 -0700, Chuck Gould

wrote:
On Jun 8, 6:34?am, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:30:38 -0700, Chuck Gould

wrote:
On May 26, 5:36?pm, Ted wrote:
On May 26, 12:42 pm, Ima Smellynig wrote:

Okay, Chuck. We already know you are a complete asshole without you
pointing it out. It would also be most considerate of you if you would
refrain from re-posting spam. That way, the rest of us who are capable
of maintaining spam filters don't have to see this ****.

CWM

Thanks, Charlie. Being a "complete asshole" is a
major promotion for me. My mom and dad would be so proud to
know that I've grown up to be just like them.

You're welcome.

CWM- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What sort of twisted jerk resorts to posting false quotes from another
poster and *then* stoops to insulting somebody's parents?

Oh, it looks like we have the answer.

Congrats, Charlie. Calling somebody's parents "assholes" is one of the
all time lows for the NG.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not as low as JimH can get!

.
 

On Jun 8, 11:44?am, basskisser wrote:
On Jun 8, 11:26 am, Charlie Morgan wrote:





On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:18:34 -0700, Chuck Gould

wrote:
On Jun 8, 8:12?am, "Jim" wrote:

And if it bothers you so much, why not simply edit the title back to
the original, racist thread. Is it because the KKK post is less
important to you than having something to bitch about?

Yes it is (Chucky dot)

At least you're more honest than your fellow critic in this thread..

Chuck's mother sucks wet green donkey dick. The video is circulating
all over the internet.

CWM

And here I thought JimH was the best here at saying nasty, crude and
untrue things about people and their families.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Why try to expand this squabble to include an innocent bystander?

Charlie Morgan's post has nothing to do with my sainted mother, and
very little to do with me, but does one heck of a lot to define who he
is and how whatever it is he substitutes for a mind attempts to work.
Obviously the poor guy needs some professional help- in fact he may
well have computer privileges in some institution where they are
already attempting to do whatever might be possible for him. In my
opinion, somebody that ill deserves our concern, and when appropriate
even perhaps prayers for his speedy and full recovery. How could any
decent person be mad at a guy so obviously unable to control himself?
It would be like yelling at a six month old baby for soiling a diaper.

JimH doesn't deserve to be tarred with the same brush. He's behaving
like a gentleman, and he ought to be treated with appropriate respect.
(The heaviest thing anybody will ever carry is a grudge).

Normally, when somebody doesn't like me it simply indicates that they
are an astute judge of character. :-) Making obscene remarks about my
mother shows a really sick and twisted personality for what it
is.......and as I said earlier it's a compliment to be considered an a-
hole by his standards.

.
 

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jun 8, 11:44?am, basskisser wrote:
On Jun 8, 11:26 am, Charlie Morgan wrote:





On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:18:34 -0700, Chuck Gould

wrote:
On Jun 8, 8:12?am, "Jim" wrote:

And if it bothers you so much, why not simply edit the title back
to
the original, racist thread. Is it because the KKK post is less
important to you than having something to bitch about?

Yes it is (Chucky dot)

At least you're more honest than your fellow critic in this thread..

Chuck's mother sucks wet green donkey dick. The video is circulating
all over the internet.

CWM

And here I thought JimH was the best here at saying nasty, crude and
untrue things about people and their families.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Why try to expand this squabble to include an innocent bystander?

Charlie Morgan's post has nothing to do with my sainted mother, and
very little to do with me, but does one heck of a lot to define who he
is and how whatever it is he substitutes for a mind attempts to work.
Obviously the poor guy needs some professional help- in fact he may
well have computer privileges in some institution where they are
already attempting to do whatever might be possible for him. In my
opinion, somebody that ill deserves our concern, and when appropriate
even perhaps prayers for his speedy and full recovery. How could any
decent person be mad at a guy so obviously unable to control himself?
It would be like yelling at a six month old baby for soiling a diaper.

JimH doesn't deserve to be tarred with the same brush. He's behaving
like a gentleman, and he ought to be treated with appropriate respect.
(The heaviest thing anybody will ever carry is a grudge).

Normally, when somebody doesn't like me it simply indicates that they
are an astute judge of character. :-) Making obscene remarks about my
mother shows a really sick and twisted personality for what it
is.......and as I said earlier it's a compliment to be considered an a-
hole by his standards.



Thanks Chuck.

One using a 'handle' without revealing his/her actual identity, such as
'basskisser', is posting anonymously and would not normally say the things
if posting under his/her real name (Charlie Morgan may be an exception to
that). In actuality, there can be millions of 'basskissers' posting on the
internet. How can you insult a fictional and anonymous character?

That is quite different than one posting with their real name/id, especially
when someone decides to direct personal attacks and insults to that person's
wife, mother or other family members.

The bottom line is that Charlie was way out of bounds and owes you an
apology.

.
 

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:17:17 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
groups.com...


Charlie Morgan's post has nothing to do with my sainted mother, and
very little to do with me, but does one heck of a lot to define who he
is and how whatever it is he substitutes for a mind attempts to work.
Obviously the poor guy needs some professional help- in fact he may
well have computer privileges in some institution where they are
already attempting to do whatever might be possible for him. In my
opinion, somebody that ill deserves our concern, and when appropriate
even perhaps prayers for his speedy and full recovery. How could any
decent person be mad at a guy so obviously unable to control himself?
It would be like yelling at a six month old baby for soiling a diaper.

JimH doesn't deserve to be tarred with the same brush. He's behaving
like a gentleman, and he ought to be treated with appropriate respect.
(The heaviest thing anybody will ever carry is a grudge).

Normally, when somebody doesn't like me it simply indicates that they
are an astute judge of character. :-) Making obscene remarks about my
mother shows a really sick and twisted personality for what it
is.......and as I said earlier it's a compliment to be considered an a-
hole by his standards.



Thanks Chuck.

One using a 'handle' without revealing his/her actual identity, such as
'basskisser', is posting anonymously and would not normally say the things
if posting under his/her real name (Charlie Morgan may be an exception to
that). In actuality, there can be millions of 'basskissers' posting on
the
internet. How can you insult a fictional and anonymous character?

That is quite different than one posting with their real name/id,
especially
when someone decides to direct personal attacks and insults to that
person's
wife, mother or other family members.

The bottom line is that Charlie was way out of bounds and owes you an
apology.


Chuck_ the_ **** is doing what he does as a cry for attention. I'm merely
giving
him some attention he didn't figure on. Over time I've seen many folks try
to
reason with him, and politely ask him to stop his moronic and
counter-productive
crusade. Chuck has ignored them. He imagines he knows something that they
don't,
and so he continues. The way I see it, Chuck_the_ schmuck should be
apologizing
to me and everyone else he offends with his reposting of racist spam.

Chuck can stop his idiotic chuckie-dot crusade at any time, and then I
will no
longer have any reason to talk about his mother. Until then, I maintain
that she
does squat thrusts on fire hydrants.

CWM

Attack him all you want. Don't bring his mother or his other family members
into the mix as that is uncalled for.

You owe him an apology.

.
 

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 18:14:09 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:17:17 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
legroups.com...


Charlie Morgan's post has nothing to do with my sainted mother, and
very little to do with me, but does one heck of a lot to define who he
is and how whatever it is he substitutes for a mind attempts to work.
Obviously the poor guy needs some professional help- in fact he may
well have computer privileges in some institution where they are
already attempting to do whatever might be possible for him. In my
opinion, somebody that ill deserves our concern, and when appropriate
even perhaps prayers for his speedy and full recovery. How could any
decent person be mad at a guy so obviously unable to control himself?
It would be like yelling at a six month old baby for soiling a diaper.

JimH doesn't deserve to be tarred with the same brush. He's behaving
like a gentleman, and he ought to be treated with appropriate respect.
(The heaviest thing anybody will ever carry is a grudge).

Normally, when somebody doesn't like me it simply indicates that they
are an astute judge of character. :-) Making obscene remarks about my
mother shows a really sick and twisted personality for what it
is.......and as I said earlier it's a compliment to be considered an
a-
hole by his standards.



Thanks Chuck.

One using a 'handle' without revealing his/her actual identity, such as
'basskisser', is posting anonymously and would not normally say the
things
if posting under his/her real name (Charlie Morgan may be an exception
to
that). In actuality, there can be millions of 'basskissers' posting on
the
internet. How can you insult a fictional and anonymous character?

That is quite different than one posting with their real name/id,
especially
when someone decides to direct personal attacks and insults to that
person's
wife, mother or other family members.

The bottom line is that Charlie was way out of bounds and owes you an
apology.


Chuck_ the_ **** is doing what he does as a cry for attention. I'm
merely
giving
him some attention he didn't figure on. Over time I've seen many folks
try
to
reason with him, and politely ask him to stop his moronic and
counter-productive
crusade. Chuck has ignored them. He imagines he knows something that
they
don't,
and so he continues. The way I see it, Chuck_the_ schmuck should be
apologizing
to me and everyone else he offends with his reposting of racist spam.

Chuck can stop his idiotic chuckie-dot crusade at any time, and then I
will no
longer have any reason to talk about his mother. Until then, I maintain
that she
does squat thrusts on fire hydrants.

CWM

Attack him all you want. Don't bring his mother or his other family
members
into the mix as that is uncalled for.

You owe him an apology.


Just like Chuck, I don't take polite, well meaning, or even reasonable,
advice.
He owes me an apology. His mother is a skanky crack whore. So is yours,
except
your mother does bestiality videos as a sideline. His mother was uglier
than the
pig, so they hired your mother, instead.

I'll provide this attention to anyone who requests it.

You're welcome.

CWM


You have now proved to the NG the extreme degree of your mentally
instability........your are indeed insane.

See ya Charlie! plonk

.
 

JimH wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jun 8, 11:44?am, basskisser wrote:
On Jun 8, 11:26 am, Charlie Morgan wrote:





On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:18:34 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote:
On Jun 8, 8:12?am, "Jim" wrote:
And if it bothers you so much, why not simply edit the title back
to
the original, racist thread. Is it because the KKK post is less
important to you than having something to bitch about?
Yes it is (Chucky dot)
At least you're more honest than your fellow critic in this thread..
Chuck's mother sucks wet green donkey dick. The video is circulating
all over the internet.
CWM
And here I thought JimH was the best here at saying nasty, crude and
untrue things about people and their families.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Why try to expand this squabble to include an innocent bystander?

Charlie Morgan's post has nothing to do with my sainted mother, and
very little to do with me, but does one heck of a lot to define who he
is and how whatever it is he substitutes for a mind attempts to work.
Obviously the poor guy needs some professional help- in fact he may
well have computer privileges in some institution where they are
already attempting to do whatever might be possible for him. In my
opinion, somebody that ill deserves our concern, and when appropriate
even perhaps prayers for his speedy and full recovery. How could any
decent person be mad at a guy so obviously unable to control himself?
It would be like yelling at a six month old baby for soiling a diaper.

JimH doesn't deserve to be tarred with the same brush. He's behaving
like a gentleman, and he ought to be treated with appropriate respect.
(The heaviest thing anybody will ever carry is a grudge).

Normally, when somebody doesn't like me it simply indicates that they
are an astute judge of character. :-) Making obscene remarks about my
mother shows a really sick and twisted personality for what it
is.......and as I said earlier it's a compliment to be considered an a-
hole by his standards.



Thanks Chuck.

One using a 'handle' without revealing his/her actual identity, such as
'basskisser', is posting anonymously and would not normally say the things
if posting under his/her real name (Charlie Morgan may be an exception to
that). In actuality, there can be millions of 'basskissers' posting on the
internet. How can you insult a fictional and anonymous character?

That is quite different than one posting with their real name/id, especially
when someone decides to direct personal attacks and insults to that person's
wife, mother or other family members.

The bottom line is that Charlie was way out of bounds and owes you an
apology.




We have a number of dirtbags here who try to hide behind false ids so
they can dump their insults with impunity.

.
 

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 21:59:48 GMT, Charlie Morgan wrote:


Chuck_ the_ **** is doing what he does as a cry for attention. I'm merely giving
him some attention he didn't figure on. Over time I've seen many folks try to
reason with him, and politely ask him to stop his moronic and counter-productive
crusade. Chuck has ignored them. He imagines he knows something that they don't,
and so he continues. The way I see it, Chuck_the_ schmuck should be apologizing
to me and everyone else he offends with his reposting of racist spam.

Chuck can stop his idiotic chuckie-dot crusade at any time, and then I will no
longer have any reason to talk about his mother. Until then, I maintain that she
does squat thrusts on fire hydrants.

CWM

You, Charlie, appear to be the one crying for attention. There are a couple
'Chuck antagonists' who probably think you're a pretty neat guy for doing
what you do.

Those with any sense see you for what you are.

.
 

Jim wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
Tell you what, Jim.....the next time I launch a thread titled "The
Cheney/Bush Lie continues to cost us some of our best and brightest",

Better check with Harry before you launch this one (Chucky dot)



**** Harry.

.
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
snip...
You, Charlie, appear to be the one crying for attention. There are a
couple
'Chuck antagonists' who probably think you're a pretty neat guy for doing
what you do.
snip...


You sure do talk stupid at times John.
There are probably a dozen posters who have been stung by Chuck's poison
pen, but I doubt any would encourage attacks against family members.
Why do you always try to facilitate trouble?

.
 

Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
snip...
You, Charlie, appear to be the one crying for attention. There are a
couple
'Chuck antagonists' who probably think you're a pretty neat guy for doing
what you do.
snip...


You sure do talk stupid at times John.
There are probably a dozen posters who have been stung by Chuck's poison
pen, but I doubt any would encourage attacks against family members.
Why do you always try to facilitate trouble?



Review your contributions to this NG and get back to us, Donnie.

.
 

On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 22:49:50 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
snip...
You, Charlie, appear to be the one crying for attention. There are a
couple
'Chuck antagonists' who probably think you're a pretty neat guy for doing
what you do.
snip...


You sure do talk stupid at times John.
There are probably a dozen posters who have been stung by Chuck's poison
pen, but I doubt any would encourage attacks against family members.
Why do you always try to facilitate trouble?


Donnie, did you read the part you snipped?

You pick the category into which you fit.

.
 

"Dan" wrote in message
hlink.net...

Review your contributions to this NG and get back to us, Donnie.

........and speaking about trouble..... right on cue.....

.
 

"John H." wrote in message
...


Donnie, did you read the part you snipped?

You pick the category into which you fit.

Try fitting yourself into a catagory & we'll let you know how delusional
you are.

./ My apology to the group for failing to ignore an idiot
 

On Jun 8, 5:26?pm, HK wrote:
JimH wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
roups.com...
On Jun 8, 11:44?am, basskisser wrote:
On Jun 8, 11:26 am, Charlie Morgan wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:18:34 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote:
On Jun 8, 8:12?am, "Jim" wrote:
And if it bothers you so much, why not simply edit the title back
to
the original, racist thread. Is it because the KKK post is less
important to you than having something to bitch about?
Yes it is (Chucky dot)
At least you're more honest than your fellow critic in this thread..
Chuck's mother sucks wet green donkey dick. The video is circulating
all over the internet.
CWM
And here I thought JimH was the best here at saying nasty, crude and
untrue things about people and their families.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Why try to expand this squabble to include an innocent bystander?

Charlie Morgan's post has nothing to do with my sainted mother, and
very little to do with me, but does one heck of a lot to define who he
is and how whatever it is he substitutes for a mind attempts to work.
Obviously the poor guy needs some professional help- in fact he may
well have computer privileges in some institution where they are
already attempting to do whatever might be possible for him. In my
opinion, somebody that ill deserves our concern, and when appropriate
even perhaps prayers for his speedy and full recovery. How could any
decent person be mad at a guy so obviously unable to control himself?
It would be like yelling at a six month old baby for soiling a diaper.

JimH doesn't deserve to be tarred with the same brush. He's behaving
like a gentleman, and he ought to be treated with appropriate respect.
(The heaviest thing anybody will ever carry is a grudge).

Normally, when somebody doesn't like me it simply indicates that they
are an astute judge of character. :-) Making obscene remarks about my
mother shows a really sick and twisted personality for what it
is.......and as I said earlier it's a compliment to be considered an a-
hole by his standards.

Thanks Chuck.

One using a 'handle' without revealing his/her actual identity, such as
'basskisser', is posting anonymously and would not normally say the things
if posting under his/her real name (Charlie Morgan may be an exception to
that). In actuality, there can be millions of 'basskissers' posting on the
internet. How can you insult a fictional and anonymous character?

That is quite different than one posting with their real name/id, especially
when someone decides to direct personal attacks and insults to that person's
wife, mother or other family members.

The bottom line is that Charlie was way out of bounds and owes you an
apology.

We have a number of dirtbags here who try to hide behind false ids so
they can dump their insults with impunity.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

According to a few theories, "Charlie W. Morgan", is the same person
as Rusty Redcloud, Binary Bill, and a few other handles. The guy has a
perverse sense of humor......The "Charles Morgan" is the world's
largest wooden ship, so he has named himself after the "world's
biggest woodie".
You have to wonder if he's compensating, particularly with all the
nasty and corrupted sexual images he posts.

He's normally encountered in all of his glory over on alt.sailing,
where he is typically as out of control and profane as he has been
here. He comes across as a Captain Neal wannabe without the wit or the
sarcastic class......more of a vicious little bully than anything
else. As near as I can tell, he's despised by virtually everbody on
the alt.sailing NG, including the illustrious Captain. You have to
wonder what happened in a life to turn somebody into a mean-spirited
pariah.

Most of the home grown flame wars in rec.boats result from
disagreements over issues, both boating and non. We do have a couple
fo folks who will toss in some unwarranted insults out of left field
just to get the pot boiling sometimes, but that's become increasingly
rare. This Charlie Morgan character lives to foster chaos- and picks
fights for the sheer joy of doing so.

Now that I have confirmed, at least to my own satisfaction, that he
really is mentally and/or emotionally unbalanced I'm going to try to
ignore him.
Picturing him as a developmentally disadvantagd individual who stands
slobbering on a street corner and makes obscene remarks to everybody
passing by helps clarify his chosen role. While the remarks are
offensive, it's easy to realize that if the party making them had any
ability to control himself he wouldn't do so....and there's no point
trying to engage such a person in any sort of conversation.

I apologize to the group for encouraging this jerk by responding to
him. Had I checked out his posting history and realized how sick he
is, I would have ignored him from the beginning. I will make a serious
effort to do so in the future.

./ My apology to the group for failing to ignore an idiot
 

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jun 8, 5:26?pm, HK wrote:
JimH wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jun 8, 11:44?am, basskisser wrote:
On Jun 8, 11:26 am, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:18:34 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote:
On Jun 8, 8:12?am, "Jim" wrote:
And if it bothers you so much, why not simply edit the title back
to
the original, racist thread. Is it because the KKK post is less
important to you than having something to bitch about?
Yes it is (Chucky dot)
At least you're more honest than your fellow critic in this thread..
Chuck's mother sucks wet green donkey dick. The video is circulating
all over the internet.
CWM
And here I thought JimH was the best here at saying nasty, crude and
untrue things about people and their families.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Why try to expand this squabble to include an innocent bystander?
Charlie Morgan's post has nothing to do with my sainted mother, and
very little to do with me, but does one heck of a lot to define who he
is and how whatever it is he substitutes for a mind attempts to work.
Obviously the poor guy needs some professional help- in fact he may
well have computer privileges in some institution where they are
already attempting to do whatever might be possible for him. In my
opinion, somebody that ill deserves our concern, and when appropriate
even perhaps prayers for his speedy and full recovery. How could any
decent person be mad at a guy so obviously unable to control himself?
It would be like yelling at a six month old baby for soiling a diaper.
JimH doesn't deserve to be tarred with the same brush. He's behaving
like a gentleman, and he ought to be treated with appropriate respect.
(The heaviest thing anybody will ever carry is a grudge).
Normally, when somebody doesn't like me it simply indicates that they
are an astute judge of character. :-) Making obscene remarks about my
mother shows a really sick and twisted personality for what it
is.......and as I said earlier it's a compliment to be considered an a-
hole by his standards.
Thanks Chuck.
One using a 'handle' without revealing his/her actual identity, such as
'basskisser', is posting anonymously and would not normally say the things
if posting under his/her real name (Charlie Morgan may be an exception to
that). In actuality, there can be millions of 'basskissers' posting on the
internet. How can you insult a fictional and anonymous character?
That is quite different than one posting with their real name/id, especially
when someone decides to direct personal attacks and insults to that person's
wife, mother or other family members.
The bottom line is that Charlie was way out of bounds and owes you an
apology.
We have a number of dirtbags here who try to hide behind false ids so
they can dump their insults with impunity.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

According to a few theories, "Charlie W. Morgan", is the same person
as Rusty Redcloud, Binary Bill, and a few other handles. The guy has a
perverse sense of humor......The "Charles Morgan" is the world's
largest wooden ship, so he has named himself after the "world's
biggest woodie".
You have to wonder if he's compensating, particularly with all the
nasty and corrupted sexual images he posts.

He's normally encountered in all of his glory over on alt.sailing,
where he is typically as out of control and profane as he has been
here. He comes across as a Captain Neal wannabe without the wit or the
sarcastic class......more of a vicious little bully than anything
else. As near as I can tell, he's despised by virtually everbody on
the alt.sailing NG, including the illustrious Captain. You have to
wonder what happened in a life to turn somebody into a mean-spirited
pariah.

Most of the home grown flame wars in rec.boats result from
disagreements over issues, both boating and non. We do have a couple
fo folks who will toss in some unwarranted insults out of left field
just to get the pot boiling sometimes, but that's become increasingly
rare. This Charlie Morgan character lives to foster chaos- and picks
fights for the sheer joy of doing so.

Now that I have confirmed, at least to my own satisfaction, that he
really is mentally and/or emotionally unbalanced I'm going to try to
ignore him.
Picturing him as a developmentally disadvantagd individual who stands
slobbering on a street corner and makes obscene remarks to everybody
passing by helps clarify his chosen role. While the remarks are
offensive, it's easy to realize that if the party making them had any
ability to control himself he wouldn't do so....and there's no point
trying to engage such a person in any sort of conversation.

I apologize to the group for encouraging this jerk by responding to
him. Had I checked out his posting history and realized how sick he
is, I would have ignored him from the beginning. I will make a serious
effort to do so in the future.




Maybe he should be outed.

./ My apology to the group for failing to ignore an idiot
 

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
I apologize to the group for encouraging this jerk by responding to
him. Had I checked out his posting history and realized how sick he
is, I would have ignored him from the beginning. I will make a serious
effort to do so in the future.


Filters are your friend. Much more effective than Chucky dots.

./ My apology to the group for failing to ignore an idiot
 

On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 17:55:04 -0400, Charlie Morgan wrote:

I'm highly unlikely to change mine.

ATTICA!!! ATTICA!!! ATTICA!!!

.
 

Don White wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
hlink.net...

Review your contributions to this NG and get back to us, Donnie.

.......and speaking about trouble..... right on cue.....



Very original, Donnie. Try to come up with something new next time, OK?

.
 

Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
Donnie, did you read the part you snipped?

You pick the category into which you fit.

Try fitting yourself into a catagory & we'll let you know how delusional
you are.



Senility defined and poor spelling, too!