On Tue, 15 May 2007 13:46:46 -0400, gene.boating wrote:


Well, there is at least one other possible source, the earth's core.
Friction from fluid movements keep the core quite hot. There are a few
scientists who have postulated, that changes there, may in fact, be
heating the oceans and contributing to global warming. I'm sorry but I
can't find the links where I read this.


I don't buy their science or logic, but I think this is a representative
link:
http://bioresonant.com/news.htm

Nah, that deep-earth reactor theory, I believe, comes from Herndon:

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/art...gi?artid=58687

But, it is not what I was referring to. Somewhere, I was reading that
the earth's core is not symmetrical, but, IIRC, more pumpkin shaped, and
due to movement, was heating the earth's crust with variable output. I
don't know if I buy it. My theory is, there are scientists who have
spent there entire careers studying climate. If they can't be sure, I
figure neither can I, even with the help of Google. ;-)

On Tue, 15 May 2007 18:40:33 -0000, thunder
wrote:

My theory is, there are scientists who have
spent there entire careers studying climate. If they can't be sure, I
figure neither can I, even with the help of Google. ;-)

Carefull - you might be considered a "denier" thus hostile to the
Church of Global Warming, Al Gore Synod.

On Tue, 15 May 2007 22:38:59 +0000, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

On Tue, 15 May 2007 18:40:33 -0000, thunder
wrote:

My theory is, there are scientists who have
spent there entire careers studying climate. If they can't be sure, I
figure neither can I, even with the help of Google. ;-)

Carefull - you might be considered a "denier" thus hostile to the Church
of Global Warming, Al Gore Synod.

Not a denier, but I am somewhat skeptical. Besides, with 1/2 the world's
oil supplies already burned, I don't think we have enough left to make a
difference in the world's climate.

On May 16, 7:06 am, thunder wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 22:38:59 +0000, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 18:40:33 -0000, thunder
wrote:

My theory is, there are scientists who have
spent there entire careers studying climate. If they can't be sure, I
figure neither can I, even with the help of Google. ;-)

Carefull - you might be considered a "denier" thus hostile to the Church
of Global Warming, Al Gore Synod.

Not a denier, but I am somewhat skeptical. Besides, with 1/2 the world's
oil supplies already burned, I don't think we have enough left to make a
difference in the world's climate.

I don't think there is any question in my mind. They do not want to
lose control of the worlds energy markets, weather oil, grain,
hydrogen, Al Gores carbon scamits, etc. But as much as I am snickered
by the recent spikes in oil, I have most of my life enjoyed pretty
reasonable energy costs. I wonder out loud that if "Big Energy/Corp"
maintained control, and stayed in front of the curve, if they would
not go back to making a good living, without killing us, as they have
done over the last half century. Also wonder who else has the money,
resources, and motivation to do and finance the r+d on alternative
fuels/energy. Shall we have someone Like Hillary "take that money from
the big oil companies and give it to folks who will put it toward r+d
for alternative fuels". (HC in a recent speech). Quite frankly, in
this instance I favor the capitalist over the socialist, I think big
energy will lead the way to the next generation of products. And as I
noted above, it's not just big oil, Dow is in partnership too, and
they do know a little abut r+d.