On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:34:13 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

wrote:
On 02 May 2007 02:14:37 GMT, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:

In message , Harry Krause sprach
forth the following:

The inspector general's report said MacDonald tried to remove
protections for a rare jumping mouse
My copy of the Constitution does not contain "protections for a rare
jumping mouse". What Article and Section of yours does?

I don't think the Constitution says anything about driving while
impaired, bank robbery, or child porn so, shall I conclude that they
are all undesirable, unconstitutional, illegal, and unenforceable
laws?

There's an entire subpopulation of "righties" who have no understanding
of the Constitution, the government, or process.

You mean like "hate speech" laws?