Tankless Water Heaters. Will GPS be the next technology blamed?
 

basskisser wrote:
On Apr 19, 7:42 pm, Dan wrote:
basskisser wrote:
On Apr 18, 8:24 pm, Dan wrote:
basskisser wrote:
On Apr 17, 5:22 pm, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:
In ooglegroups.com,
basskisser sprach forth the following:
hot water heater.
Why do you need to heat hot water?
To make it hotter, perhaps? For your information, in real, scientific
terms, there is no cold, just less heat.
Right. Got a cite for that, pot farmer?
Please show what evidence you have that I'm a "pot farmer". What?
Don't have any? Why am I not surprised? Oh, I know, because you LOVE
to post showing just how ignorant of fact you are. Let's see the
facts, stalker.
I'm not going to waste time digging up your posts where you clearly
admit to growing pot - unless you offer a wager?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Who, Kevin, Walter, or me?


The post can be read like a book - top to bottom. What part confused
you and led you to that response?

Tankless Water Heaters. Will GPS be the next technology blamed?
 

basskisser wrote:
On Apr 19, 7:43 pm, Dan wrote:
basskisser wrote:
On Apr 18, 8:24 pm, Dan wrote:
basskisser wrote:
On Apr 17, 5:22 pm, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:
In ooglegroups.com,
basskisser sprach forth the following:
hot water heater.
Why do you need to heat hot water?
To make it hotter, perhaps? For your information, in real, scientific
terms, there is no cold, just less heat.
Right. Got a cite for that, pot farmer?
And yes, stalker, there is plenty of "cites". But, if you don't
believe, it, then you're really not smart enough to grasp the concept.
Such as, if there IS such a thing as cold, then why can't we get
ANYTHING down to a temperature that is less than absolute zero, which
by definition is when there is NO HEAT ENERGY in a given substance?
So, absolute zero is simply the lack of heat. We can hit 458 degrees
below zero which is no heat, but we can't go any further after that.
There is no such thing as cold. Cold is only a word we use to describe
the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat is energy. Cold is
not the opposite of heat, just the absence of it. The same way as the
word darkness simply describes the absence of light. Now if you are
really interested, there are PLENTY of good reads on the subject out
there.
Two responses to the same post, Walter?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Time for a song! Just for my little stalker buddy:
Infatuation......
Infatuations.....
It's making Dan crazy......
It's driving Dan CRAAAZZZYYYY.......


Time for an intervention!

Tankless Water Heaters. Will GPS be the next technology blamed?
 

basskisser wrote:
On Apr 19, 7:42 pm, Dan wrote:
basskisser wrote:
On Apr 18, 8:24 pm, Dan wrote:
basskisser wrote:
On Apr 17, 5:22 pm, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:
In ooglegroups.com,
basskisser sprach forth the following:
hot water heater.
Why do you need to heat hot water?
To make it hotter, perhaps? For your information, in real, scientific
terms, there is no cold, just less heat.
Right. Got a cite for that, pot farmer?
Please show what evidence you have that I'm a "pot farmer". What?
Don't have any? Why am I not surprised? Oh, I know, because you LOVE
to post showing just how ignorant of fact you are. Let's see the
facts, stalker.
I'm not going to waste time digging up your posts where you clearly
admit to growing pot - unless you offer a wager?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Ooopsy, Danny, you forgot to respond to my instructive reply to you
concerning there is no cold, just less heat.


What "reply"? The whole thread is up there...

Tankless Water Heaters. Will GPS be the next technology blamed?
 

Dan wrote:

basskisser wrote:

On Apr 19, 7:42 pm, Dan wrote:

basskisser wrote:

On Apr 18, 8:24 pm, Dan wrote:

basskisser wrote:

On Apr 17, 5:22 pm, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:

In
ooglegroups.com,
basskisser sprach forth the following:

hot water heater.

Why do you need to heat hot water?

To make it hotter, perhaps? For your information, in real, scientific
terms, there is no cold, just less heat.

Right. Got a cite for that, pot farmer?

Please show what evidence you have that I'm a "pot farmer". What?
Don't have any? Why am I not surprised? Oh, I know, because you LOVE
to post showing just how ignorant of fact you are. Let's see the
facts, stalker.

I'm not going to waste time digging up your posts where you clearly
admit to growing pot - unless you offer a wager?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Who, Kevin, Walter, or me?


The post can be read like a book - top to bottom. What part confused
you and led you to that response?

Kevin is two taco's short of a combination plate.

Tankless Water Heaters. Will GPS be the next technology blamed?
 

"Dan" wrote in message
...

Time for an intervention!


I'd say you're way beyond that. A little electric shock treatment might
make you straighten out and fly right.

Tankless Water Heaters. Will GPS be the next technology blamed?
 

JimH wrote:
Just had to use a Chuck trick of mentioning piece a boating hardware to make
this on topic.

Has anyone ditched their hot water tank(s) in their house and replaced
it/them with a tankless water heater?

Just curious as our two 50 gallon hot water tanks are 15 years and at/near
their useful life. Replacing them does not make sense with the advances in
tankless water heater technology. Many of these tankless water heaters are
also eligible for a $300 tax credit.

I am looking at the Bosch 2400E (natural gas) which can supply 2 showers
simultaneously, or so the specs say.

Any tankless water heater users out there?


I considered it when my WH died a about 4 years ago. an engineer friend
convinced me to stay with the status quo.
Current Gas bill 50.00 usd per month for 1 50 gallon WH, Gas clothes
dryer and a convection range.


Liberally yours

Fredo

Tankless Water Heaters. Will GPS be the next technology blamed?
 

Harry Krause wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
JimH wrote:
Just had to use a Chuck trick of mentioning piece a boating hardware
to make this on topic.

Has anyone ditched their hot water tank(s) in their house and
replaced it/them with a tankless water heater?

Just curious as our two 50 gallon hot water tanks are 15 years and
at/near their useful life. Replacing them does not make sense with
the advances in tankless water heater technology. Many of these
tankless water heaters are also eligible for a $300 tax credit.

I am looking at the Bosch 2400E (natural gas) which can supply 2
showers simultaneously, or so the specs say.

Any tankless water heater users out there?

As an English major, I haven't a clue as to how these devices supply
a steady stream of hot water. Please explain.

Maybe this will help:

http://www.toolbase.org/pdf/techinv/...s_techspec.pdf



Yeah, I know how they work. But I don't see how they supply a steady
stream of hot water, especially for an active household with several
appliances running and someone in the tub or shower.

It's easy in theory: 100,000 btu heater Vs a regular tank WH with 30,000
btu heater.

Liberally Yours

1.20.09

Fredo

Tankless Water Heaters. Will GPS be the next technology blamed?
 

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 03:04:25 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


"Dan" wrote in message
.. .

Time for an intervention!


I'd say you're way beyond that. A little electric shock treatment might
make you straighten out and fly right.


That's the state of health care in Canada. No thanks.

Tankless Water Heaters. Will GPS be the next technology blamed?
 

"Jack Goff" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 03:04:25 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


"Dan" wrote in message
. ..

Time for an intervention!


I'd say you're way beyond that. A little electric shock treatment might
make you straighten out and fly right.


That's the state of health care in Canada. No thanks.



Sissy... it didn't hurt me a bit!