A carbon offset for you *and* the Chesapeake!
 

On Apr 13, 1:56 pm, "Chuck Gould" wrote:
On Apr 13, 9:03?am, "JimH" wrote:



"Chuck Gould" wrote in message\
roups.com...
On Apr 12, 3:25?pm, "JimH" wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message

...

JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:09:34 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Here is a chance to do some good for the CO2 problem, and help the
Chesapeake Bay at the same time! It's even possible to have this
done
in
honor of someone, like Harry, who should be getting his card any
minute!

http://www.cbf.org/site/PageServer?p..._campaign_tree

Please visit and help out!
An example of the e-card can be seen he

http://tinyurl.com/2grudsor

http://www.cbf.org/site/Ecard?tl_id=...BG0HkOg.&s_oo=...
--
*****Have a Spectacular Day!*****

? ? John H

What are are you now...a full time fundraiser?
No wonder 75% of monies raised for some charitys goes to
'adminintrative
costs'.

ROTF! I am sure he will also make public all donations, by name and
dollar amount!

Crikey...how did I get on his hit list?

Since the old man is boatless and cannot golf he obviously decided to make
this his new hobby. Expect to receive a never ending stream of emails from
him asking for contributions to all sorts of causes.

I wonder what his take is?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


=============

From what I have been able to see the old man has done his share of personal
attacks on me.

Is there some particular reason that you feel compelled to launch a
personal attack on John H?

Can you remind me again where you complained to JohnH for those attacks on
me?

Both of you live by double standards.

==================================
Let's say that's true.


It is true. Stop worrying about what I post. Don't like
it.........don't read it.

If you find it necessary to netcop, do so equally. Otherwise shove it.

A carbon offset for you *and* the Chesapeake!
 

On 13 Apr 2007 10:52:06 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:

On Apr 13, 1:44 pm, John H. wrote:
On 13 Apr 2007 08:53:32 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:





On Apr 12, 3:25?pm, "JimH" wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message

...

JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:09:34 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Here is a chance to do some good for the CO2 problem, and help the
Chesapeake Bay at the same time! It's even possible to have this done
in
honor of someone, like Harry, who should be getting his card any
minute!

http://www.cbf.org/site/PageServer?p..._campaign_tree

Please visit and help out!
An example of the e-card can be seen he

http://tinyurl.com/2grudsor

http://www.cbf.org/site/Ecard?tl_id=...BG0HkOg.&s_oo=...
--
*****Have a Spectacular Day!*****

ohn H

What are are you now...a full time fundraiser?
No wonder 75% of monies raised for some charitys goes to 'adminintrative
costs'.

ROTF! am sure he will also make public all donations, by name and
dollar amount!

Crikey...how did I get on his hit list?

Since the old man is boatless and cannot golf he obviously decided to make
this his new hobby. xpect to receive a never ending stream of emails from
him asking for contributions to all sorts of causes.

I wonder what his take is?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Is there some particular reason that you feel compelled to launch a
personal attack on John H?

A remark that "a fundraising pitch for this charity or that might be
somewhat out of place on a boating NG" is one thing- but calling him a
"boatless old man", predicting an endless stream of spam emails from
him, and accusing him of being "on the take" are all personality
oriented responses.

If you don't care for his use of the NG to drum up funds for
apparently worthy causes, you have every right to express your
opinion. (I don't care for the way some people use the NG primarily as
a vehicle to make crappy personal remarks, and have expressed that
opinion). But it's also my opinion that
it would be more constructive to address John's observed behavior
rather than
speculate what he *might* do, and use that speculation as the basis
for disparaging personal comments.

I suppose he thinks his use of the 'boatless' term is bothersome to me.
Somewhere along the way, he misread or miscomprehended something.

The Chesapeake Bay is one of this country's great natural resources, and it
is going down the tube quickly. As a member of the Chesapeake Bay
Foundation, I've no qualms about posting both information and requests for
help in the newsgroup.
--
*****Have a Spectacular Day!*****

John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Jimmy sure didn't like it when HE was boatless, and someone said
something to him about it.

That's true, and he really *was* boatless. I'm sure he misread something,
which he's done many times. Actually, being boatless would be a boon to my
finances right now. It's 'spring commissioning' time, which means tune up,
etc.
--
*****Have a Spectacular Day!*****

John H