![]() |
|
fast boat
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:16:33 -0400, RJSmithers
wrote: Tim wrote: On Mar 15, 8:32?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: I looked at that photo and have to wonder if it's been Photoshopped. I have my suspicions about short shaft outboards being very effective in terms of speed on that boat And it really does seem like an odd boat/engine combination. The last item is the 8 engine set up for 1.1M Euros http://www.cromptonmarine.com/list_uk.html Notice the speed? 65 mph. I can do that in my Ranger. PFFHHHTTT.... blur on the radar indeed. + |
fast boat
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:16:33 -0400, RJSmithers wrote: Tim wrote: On Mar 15, 8:32?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: I looked at that photo and have to wonder if it's been Photoshopped. I have my suspicions about short shaft outboards being very effective in terms of speed on that boat And it really does seem like an odd boat/engine combination. The last item is the 8 engine set up for 1.1M Euros http://www.cromptonmarine.com/list_uk.html Notice the speed? 65 mph. I can do that in my Ranger. PFFHHHTTT.... blur on the radar indeed. + I can do that on my Lambretta. |
fast boat
Eisboch wrote:
"RJSmithers" wrote in message . .. Tim wrote: On Mar 15, 8:32?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: I looked at that photo and have to wonder if it's been Photoshopped. I have my suspicions about short shaft outboards being very effective in terms of speed on that boat And it really does seem like an odd boat/engine combination. The last item is the 8 engine set up for 1.1M Euros http://www.cromptonmarine.com/list_uk.html 5,283.4 gallons fuel tankage. $ 14,793.52 for a fill-up at 2.80 per gal. Free wash, though. Eisboch This boat is sold in Europe, it is probably closer to $5/gal, but if you are making millions on your haul of drugs, what is $30,000? |
fast boat
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:16:33 -0400, RJSmithers wrote: Tim wrote: On Mar 15, 8:32?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: I looked at that photo and have to wonder if it's been Photoshopped. I have my suspicions about short shaft outboards being very effective in terms of speed on that boat And it really does seem like an odd boat/engine combination. The last item is the 8 engine set up for 1.1M Euros http://www.cromptonmarine.com/list_uk.html Notice the speed? 65 mph. I can do that in my Ranger. PFFHHHTTT.... blur on the radar indeed. + I think they are deliberately underrating the speed. |
fast boat
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
... On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:16:33 -0400, RJSmithers wrote: Tim wrote: On Mar 15, 8:32?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: I looked at that photo and have to wonder if it's been Photoshopped. I have my suspicions about short shaft outboards being very effective in terms of speed on that boat And it really does seem like an odd boat/engine combination. The last item is the 8 engine set up for 1.1M Euros http://www.cromptonmarine.com/list_uk.html Notice the speed? 65 mph. I can do that in my Ranger. PFFHHHTTT.... blur on the radar indeed. + I'm guessing you can also make nice turns with your Ranger. But, this "drug boat" - I have doubts about that crowd of metal being very nimble. |
fast boat
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:16:33 -0400, RJSmithers wrote: Tim wrote: On Mar 15, 8:32?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: I looked at that photo and have to wonder if it's been Photoshopped. I have my suspicions about short shaft outboards being very effective in terms of speed on that boat And it really does seem like an odd boat/engine combination. The last item is the 8 engine set up for 1.1M Euros http://www.cromptonmarine.com/list_uk.html Notice the speed? 65 mph. I can do that in my Ranger. PFFHHHTTT.... blur on the radar indeed. + But with a couple of tons of drugs aboard? |
fast boat
Eisboch wrote:
"RJSmithers" wrote in message . .. Tim wrote: On Mar 15, 8:32?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: I looked at that photo and have to wonder if it's been Photoshopped. I have my suspicions about short shaft outboards being very effective in terms of speed on that boat And it really does seem like an odd boat/engine combination. The last item is the 8 engine set up for 1.1M Euros http://www.cromptonmarine.com/list_uk.html 5,283.4 gallons fuel tankage. $ 14,793.52 for a fill-up at 2.80 per gal. Free wash, though. Eisboch That's 31,700# in fuel alone. Add another 4300# hanging on the transom and you get over 35,000# on a 60' hull. 60 knots might be a dream even if you could get it on plane. Assuming the best, at WOT (what else is this built for?) you might get 11 hours running time for a range of maybe 800 miles. That's about $19.00 per mile - or $19.00 per minute. If I was in the drug business, I would look for another method of transportation. |
fast boat
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:56:58 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:16:33 -0400, RJSmithers wrote: Tim wrote: On Mar 15, 8:32?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: I looked at that photo and have to wonder if it's been Photoshopped. I have my suspicions about short shaft outboards being very effective in terms of speed on that boat And it really does seem like an odd boat/engine combination. The last item is the 8 engine set up for 1.1M Euros http://www.cromptonmarine.com/list_uk.html Notice the speed? 65 mph. I can do that in my Ranger. PFFHHHTTT.... blur on the radar indeed. + But with a couple of tons of drugs aboard? Good point. Although now that I think about it, maybe it was the drugs that caused the blur on the radar. Or a fly. |
fast boat
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:56:58 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote: I can do that in my Ranger. PFFHHHTTT.... blur on the radar indeed. + But with a couple of tons of drugs aboard? And in the English Channel? (10 to 12 ft seas, etc.) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com