| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 11, 3:32�pm, wrote:
Sea Ray has better name recognition than Rinker thanks mainly to great marketing. *On the other hand the Rinker may actually have higher quality hardware and workmanship. *Compare the quality of things like deck rails (welded or t-fittings, diameter) and cabin cabinetry and hardware. Do you have some basis for that statement, (opinion) or is it purely rhetorical? If I dig out the Powerboat Guide from 1998, (back when the Rinker was new) the corporate "puff statement" (normally supplied by or influenced and approved by the builder) empasizes that the company "builds a series of affordably priced models". The lead sentence on the 260/265 Fiesta Vee reads, "The Rinker 260/265 Fiesta Vee is an economy-priced mid-cabin family cruiser with an attractive profile to go with her relatively narrow 8-foot, 6-inch beam." The fact that economy pricing is used as a preface for the rest of the description is seldom a good sign. The third sentence on the 266 Fiesta Vee reads "Like all Rinker models, the 266 is a fairly straightforward boat, affordaby priced and conservatively built on a solid fiberglass deep-V hull" The lead sentence on the 280 Fiesta Vee reads, "Like all Rinker models, the 280 Fiesta Vee is a budget-priced, no-glitz package." The lead sentence for the Rinker 300 Fiesta Vee reads, "The Rinker 300 Fiesta Vee is a sporty and affordably priced express cruiser......" etc, etc etc, That wouldn't give a lot of folks much reason to expect better harware and workmanship than found on a Sea Ray. The only other boat brand that comes to mind that makes such a point of crowing about affordable pricing starts with a letter very near the beginning of the alphabet. It may well be that Rinker boats are different now than they were in 1998 and that the company is trying to market from a quality, rather than a price standpoint. However, as the original poster is looking at a 1998 model it's more useful to see how the company viewed its place in the market back then, as opposed to what they may be trying to do in 2007. "We build cheaper boats" isn't the world's most encouraging mission statement. Not to say that an individual, nine year old 1998 Rinker couldn't be a better boat than an individual, nine year old 1998 Sea Ray, of course... but I'd be surprised to learn that they were generally better boats when new. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Rinker service manuals? | General | |||
| Rinker 232 service / owners manuals? | Cruising | |||
| FS: 2001 Rinker Captiva 212 in N. Florida | Marketplace | |||
| Rinker 272 Cuddy - 9' Beam? WTF? How big is it really? | General | |||
| Four Winns or Rinker Cuddy? | General | |||