LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,117
Default Rinker or Sea Ray

On Mar 11, 3:32�pm, wrote:


Sea Ray has better name recognition than Rinker thanks mainly to great
marketing. *On the other hand the Rinker may actually have higher
quality hardware and workmanship. *Compare the quality of things like
deck rails (welded or t-fittings, diameter) and cabin cabinetry and
hardware.



Do you have some basis for that statement, (opinion) or is it purely
rhetorical?

If I dig out the Powerboat Guide from 1998, (back when the Rinker was
new) the corporate "puff statement" (normally supplied by or
influenced and approved by the builder) empasizes that the company
"builds a series of affordably priced models".

The lead sentence on the 260/265 Fiesta Vee reads, "The Rinker 260/265
Fiesta Vee is an economy-priced mid-cabin family cruiser with an
attractive profile to go with her relatively narrow 8-foot, 6-inch
beam." The fact that economy pricing is used as a preface for the rest
of the description is seldom a good sign.

The third sentence on the 266 Fiesta Vee reads "Like all Rinker
models, the 266 is a fairly straightforward boat, affordaby priced and
conservatively built on a solid fiberglass deep-V hull"

The lead sentence on the 280 Fiesta Vee reads, "Like all Rinker
models, the 280 Fiesta Vee is a budget-priced, no-glitz package."

The lead sentence for the Rinker 300 Fiesta Vee reads, "The Rinker 300
Fiesta Vee is a sporty and affordably priced express cruiser......"

etc, etc etc,

That wouldn't give a lot of folks much reason to expect better harware
and workmanship than found on a Sea Ray.

The only other boat brand that comes to mind that makes such a point
of crowing about affordable pricing starts with a letter very near the
beginning of the alphabet.

It may well be that Rinker boats are different now than they were in
1998 and that the company is trying to market from a quality, rather
than a price standpoint. However, as the original poster is looking at
a 1998 model it's more useful to see how the company viewed its place
in the market back then, as opposed to what they may be trying to do
in 2007. "We build cheaper boats" isn't the world's most encouraging
mission statement.

Not to say that an individual, nine year old 1998 Rinker couldn't be a
better boat than an individual, nine year old 1998 Sea Ray, of
course... but I'd be surprised to learn that they were generally
better boats when new.









 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rinker service manuals? WKR General 4 June 14th 05 09:16 PM
Rinker 232 service / owners manuals? WKR Cruising 0 June 10th 05 11:20 PM
FS: 2001 Rinker Captiva 212 in N. Florida Blue Water Bay Yachts, Inc. Marketplace 0 January 28th 04 11:32 PM
Rinker 272 Cuddy - 9' Beam? WTF? How big is it really? Slambram General 0 December 17th 03 04:24 PM
Four Winns or Rinker Cuddy? David Ditch General 1 October 6th 03 02:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017