| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... mark wrote: On Feb 23, 7:44 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: mark wrote: A picture speaks 1000 words so here is a link to our industry with pictures. http://www.confederationcove.com/ima...bum.cfm?aid=13 As the mussel "socks" grow they become heavier and eventually will touch bottom were predators such as starfish begin to eat the mussels. We like to keep the socks approx. 1' off bottom, this means either picking up the socks and looking for starfish, diving or using an accurate sounder. The sounders I mention are able to run either 50 or 200khz, does this mean a dual frequency transducer should be available or do I have to choose 50 or 200? Got the idea now - interesting. The Sitex is selectable, so select 50 KHz. Is this muddy, rocky or sandy bottom we're talking about. Mud Then you definitely want 300 watts at 50 KHz. You might want to check accuracy with a lead line for a few times just to make sure - muddy bottoms can be tricky with a sounder depending on it's density and what not. That way you gage it's accuracy and get a feel for what is and isn't bottom on the finder. Why a 50 khz? We use the 50 for deep water and the 200 khz for shallower water. He may be better off with a sounder from a bass fishing boat setup. They are used a lot in shallower water. For a mount, I would weld a plate on the side of the boat towards the front that you could attach the all plastic transom mount xducer to. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Installing second Depth sounder | Electronics | |||
| Depth sounders to show negative numbers | Electronics | |||
| Sounders | General | |||
| Faulty depth finder attributed to whale attack!! | ASA | |||