On Feb 3, 8:07 am, "Chuck Gould" wrote:
On Feb 2, 5:25?pm, wrote:

On Feb 2, 12:45 pm, "Mike" wrote:

ROFLOL! The way this guy just showed up and started popping off to anyone he
could, ?seemed strange. Now it makes sense, and is actually kind of funny.

It could have been real fun - we've had some real battles in the good
old
days - all very civil and all very nasthy. ?:)

Oh well, it seemed like a good idea at the time. ?:)

I think I'd disagree that trying to start flame wars, simply because
it might be fun, would be a good idea.

Of course you would - which is fine, but (and I mean no offense here
you must understand - just an opinion) you and others here lack a
certain sense of "whimsy" if you will. Flame wars can be fun and
if the participants keep it civil, it's much like having a "snap"
contest.

On the other hand, all here are good people even if a little odd from
time to time so it's a wash in the end. :)