On Jan 31, 4:35�am, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

ntirely





dissimilar from what Ian describes above) with a 45-foot Hatteras and
reported the results in a blog called "Snake Oil Chronicles" couldn't
be the Karl Denninger who at one time was a regular poster here?

*If* this were the same Denninger (don't know that it is) would his
detailed report of testing a magnetic fuel conditioner be more
acceptable to the group than comments from an unknown person?

Once again, I would not want to say absolutely that this is the same
person- but it's a rather unusual last name, and the universe of
people named Denninger who are interested in boating and likely to own
a Hatteras or similar quality vessel has to be extremely small. I do
not mean to imply that this person is or absolutely has to be Karl
Denninger, ex-denizen of this newsgroup, and if an apology is in order
for merely wondering whether it might be, I'll extend it in advance.

Chuck,
Why can't the FTC and EPA duplicate these results? *Even more amazing is
if Diesel-Tex DTX is not a scam, why don't they provide the EPA with the
test results, so they can conduct the tests, and the EPA can remove this
product from it's list of useless products? *It not only would be good
for business, but it would be good for the environment. *Why don't you
ask the mfg'er why he has not provided this independent data to the FTC
and EPA? *This would not only be a more interesting article, but also
provide a true service to your readers. *I understand that your magazine
relies on advertisement dollars to make money, but the magazine
creditability is what makes your "reviews" worthwhile to the readers.
If they believe your "reviews" are nothing more than unpaid ads, they
will discount all of your "reviews".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What "review"?

I pose a question regarding whether or not such a device could work,
and explore how it might work if it does.

Hardly a review, and certainly not an endorsement.