Trouble shooting a bad back
 

On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:32:00 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 06:56:28 -0800, "Tim" wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:

I wonder what he holds against all of you.
at least to me?

nothing.
Then why do you condone his actions such as lying about people, saying
untrue and nasty things about one's self, wife and kids? Why do you
condone someone who spreads untrue and wild allegations about criminal
activities? Would you like it if someone did those things to you? Do
you think someone who would stoop so low as to bring your wife and kids
into a discussion just to talk nasty about them is the kind of person
you want to associate with? Do you think that someone who would turn on
you in a heartbeat (think JohnH) and do the exact same to you is the
kind of person you want as a friend?
I wish basskisser would notice how much time and effort I've devoted to
JimH since his little backstabbing soiree.

Not much!
--

John
I donated to the Susan Komen fund on behalf of your daughter.
No you didn't. You were one of the very few here who wouldn't donate.
Then why is my name on the back of the t-shirt John, his daughter and
their team wore?

Sorry guy but you are wrong as usual.

You refused right here, or was you lying again? And I thought I was
killfiled, another lie from the biggest liar in usenet?
Go back into hiding, low life. Did you notice that not ONE person ever
asked where you were? Everyone just reveled in the peace....

I have to agree with Bassy when he said:

It's often noted that people with an infatuation complex will, when
shunned by the person they are stalking, often turn against the very
person they are enamored with.

Reggie, what would I do without you? Why, I'd have missed these wonderful
posts by basskisser and JimH. Now, for the record:

First, JimH *did* make a contribution to the cancer foundation. His lying
and false allegations were made after he made his contribution, when the
little green jealousy bug got him. (Just as it gets him with anyone who is
respected here.)

Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:32:00 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 06:56:28 -0800, "Tim" wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:

I wonder what he holds against all of you.
at least to me?

nothing.
Then why do you condone his actions such as lying about people, saying
untrue and nasty things about one's self, wife and kids? Why do you
condone someone who spreads untrue and wild allegations about criminal
activities? Would you like it if someone did those things to you? Do
you think someone who would stoop so low as to bring your wife and kids
into a discussion just to talk nasty about them is the kind of person
you want to associate with? Do you think that someone who would turn on
you in a heartbeat (think JohnH) and do the exact same to you is the
kind of person you want as a friend?
I wish basskisser would notice how much time and effort I've devoted to
JimH since his little backstabbing soiree.

Not much!
--

John
I donated to the Susan Komen fund on behalf of your daughter.
No you didn't. You were one of the very few here who wouldn't donate.
Then why is my name on the back of the t-shirt John, his daughter and
their team wore?

Sorry guy but you are wrong as usual.

You refused right here, or was you lying again? And I thought I was
killfiled, another lie from the biggest liar in usenet?
Go back into hiding, low life. Did you notice that not ONE person ever
asked where you were? Everyone just reveled in the peace....

I have to agree with Bassy when he said:

It's often noted that people with an infatuation complex will, when
shunned by the person they are stalking, often turn against the very
person they are enamored with.

Reggie, what would I do without you? Why, I'd have missed these wonderful
posts by basskisser and JimH. Now, for the record:

First, JimH *did* make a contribution to the cancer foundation. His lying
and false allegations were made after he made his contribution, when the
little green jealousy bug got him. (Just as it gets him with anyone who is
respected here.)

Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John

Well maybe you will miss this one too.

Go find a golfing NG John. You have nothing to offer here.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

SPAM Avenger wrote:
On 6 Jan 2007 06:45:38 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


SPAM Avenger wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 16:22:48 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Come to rec.boats, and do nothing but stir ****, then whine about your
poor little back. Make sure that you killfile someone, then like a
coward, talk **** about them knowing they can't reply.

What does "Trouble shooting a bad back" mean in English?
Only a sick person would make fun of anothers medical condition. Kevin
needs serious psychological help.
Karma. You deserve everything you get. Maybe you'll quit your incessant
lying about others, liar.

Who is shooting whose back and why is he having trouble doing it?

You just don't get it, do you?

No, I don't.

Basskisser is really a woman.

Think about it - look back at the posts over the past year.

Bassy is a woman - no doubt about it.

And you're an idiot.

Definitely a woman. Worse yet, permanent PMS.

Try some Midol.

Defintely a child. Worse yet, a dumb child. Try giving mommy back her
computer.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

JimH wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:32:00 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 06:56:28 -0800, "Tim" wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:

I wonder what he holds against all of you.
at least to me?

nothing.
Then why do you condone his actions such as lying about people, saying
untrue and nasty things about one's self, wife and kids? Why do you
condone someone who spreads untrue and wild allegations about criminal
activities? Would you like it if someone did those things to you? Do
you think someone who would stoop so low as to bring your wife and kids
into a discussion just to talk nasty about them is the kind of person
you want to associate with? Do you think that someone who would turn on
you in a heartbeat (think JohnH) and do the exact same to you is the
kind of person you want as a friend?
I wish basskisser would notice how much time and effort I've devoted to
JimH since his little backstabbing soiree.

Not much!
--

John
I donated to the Susan Komen fund on behalf of your daughter.
No you didn't. You were one of the very few here who wouldn't donate.
Then why is my name on the back of the t-shirt John, his daughter and
their team wore?

Sorry guy but you are wrong as usual.

You refused right here, or was you lying again? And I thought I was
killfiled, another lie from the biggest liar in usenet?
Go back into hiding, low life. Did you notice that not ONE person ever
asked where you were? Everyone just reveled in the peace....

I have to agree with Bassy when he said:

It's often noted that people with an infatuation complex will, when
shunned by the person they are stalking, often turn against the very
person they are enamored with.

Reggie, what would I do without you? Why, I'd have missed these wonderful
posts by basskisser and JimH. Now, for the record:

First, JimH *did* make a contribution to the cancer foundation. His lying
and false allegations were made after he made his contribution, when the
little green jealousy bug got him. (Just as it gets him with anyone who is
respected here.)

Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John

Well maybe you will miss this one too.

Go find a golfing NG John. You have nothing to offer here.

Jim, what have you offered since your return?

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

SPAM Avenger wrote:
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:29:18 -0500, JohnH wrote:

Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.

Basskisser, being a fine example of womanhood, deserves a new name.

Why? Well she's living out a fantasy life here where all her thoughts
and comments are considered by her to be reasoned and the sheer number
of posts means that she has an active social life - albeit a negative
one.

Thus, in the Grand Tradition of Fantasy Role Playing - which is
Basskisser's realm - Basskisser shall change names and become a new
character.

That character is:



Wait for it


Wait for it


Wait for it


BASSKISSER THE BROAD!!

Description: Basskisser The Broad isn't a traditional fantasy
character in the sense of over whelming intellect, speed of thought or
reasoned logic. In fact, compared to other characters, Basskisser The
Broad is fairly, and almost universally, considered one of the weaker
fantasy characters.

However, Basskisser The Broad does have an advantage that other
characters don't - words. Sheer, unmitigated, uncontrolled and over
powering amounts of words. Words in combinations that have never been
seen in the fantasy universe.

Profile:

Hit Points: Unlimited. Doesn't shut up.
Comprehension: None - complete inability to read.
Sentence Construction: Marginal.
Insult Level: Unlimited
Health: Mental - Unstable. Physical - Unknown
Healing: Low - inability to admit error
Babble factor: Unlimited.

General Usage:

Basskisser the Broad has limited use in normal discussion. However,
she can be effective in destroying any reasoned debate by the use of
key words and phrases such as Al Gore Invented the Internet or Global
Warming. Or combinations such as Al Gore Invented Global Warming. Any
combination of common liberal key words will set her off.

Be aware that Basskisser The Broad has a natural opponent in Dan The
Dim. However, if a slight reasoned debate truce between opponents can
be arranged, it is possible for you to set Basskisser The Broad
against Dan The Dim allowing for you and another debate opponent(s) to
walk off allowing Basskisser The Broad to babble on distracted and not
noticing anything outside her current situation.

Awe, how cute! Now give mommy back her computer before you get spanked,
little guy.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
snip...
Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John

There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz but do applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class by themselves.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:41 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
snip...
Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John

There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz but do applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class by themselves.


Wrong.
--

John

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:41 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
. ..
snip...

Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John

There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz but do applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class by themselves.



Wrong.

It is obvious who is in a class all by themselves in polluting this NG

This month's top posters

103 basskisser
63
49
47
43
41
35
33 JimH
27
24

All time top posters

12864
12093 basskisser
9354
8766
8612
8507
6632
6359
5927
5425

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:41 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
. ..
snip...
Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not
at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John

There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz but do
applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class by
themselves.


Wrong.
--

John

Really? I thought about this and decided that Calif Bill & Jack Goff would
have to be in a slightly higher catagory only because they actually own
boats and do boat on occasion. (at least I think they do)

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:25:44 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


Bilious Bill is a boater and fisherman, no doubt about it.
Jackoff is just...a jackoff.

He probably thinks you're quite neat also and is thankful that you will
deign to call him names!
--

John