Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#161
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:23:22 GMT, "Don White"
wrote: "Dan" wrote in message .. . basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: Don White wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message legroups.com... -- Getting a little upset, stalker? Funny...the stalkers sure don't like it when they become the stalkee. Can you explain that in English? -- Too stupid to understand it? That's a shame. No wonder your infatuated with me. No, I understand that it doesn't make any sense - just like YOUR post... What I don't understand is how your third sentence relates in any way to the other two or even the thread. How would this imaginary "infatuation" have any bearing on my understanding something Don posted? Remember, this was a response to Don, not you, Walter, as much as that might disturb your fragile, young mind. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Seriously Dan... I'm not sure I can make it any simplier or clearer... but lets try. a/ you stalk basskisser all the time b/ someone stalks you....you do not like it How's that...better? (insert theme to Twilight Zone) Don, if two dogs are chasing each other's tail around and around and around, who's the leader? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a super day! ***** ****************************************** John H |
#162
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Dan wrote: Don White wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message egroups.com... -- Getting a little upset, stalker? Funny...the stalkers sure don't like it when they become the stalkee. Can you explain that in English? -- Too stupid to understand it? That's a shame. No wonder your infatuated with me. "Your"? Another *typo*? Watch out, he may try to "cow down" you. When Dan makes a third of the number of posts that kevin does, maybe someone will beleive him. Until then, he remains the "King of the NG idiots" |
#163
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: Don White wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message groups.com... -- Getting a little upset, stalker? Funny...the stalkers sure don't like it when they become the stalkee. Can you explain that in English? -- Too stupid to understand it? That's a shame. No wonder your infatuated with me. No, I understand that it doesn't make any sense - just like YOUR post... What I don't understand is how your third sentence relates in any way to the other two or even the thread. How would this imaginary "infatuation" have any bearing on my understanding something Don posted? Easy. One's infatuation, when it's as extreme as yours consumes your thought process. It's kind of like being extremely in love, you just can't think straight. Remember, this was a response to Don, not you, Walter, as much as that might disturb your fragile, young mind. I'm not Walter, and I'm not young. You're just never correct, are you? -- Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy..... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY......... |
#164
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JimH wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Dan wrote: Don White wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... -- Getting a little upset, stalker? Funny...the stalkers sure don't like it when they become the stalkee. Can you explain that in English? -- Too stupid to understand it? That's a shame. No wonder your infatuated with me. "Your"? Another *typo*? Awe, how cute! I'll make sure to check each and every one of your messages for grammatical, spelling, and typographical errors, too, okay? Grow up. |
#165
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: Don White wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message legroups.com... -- Getting a little upset, stalker? Funny...the stalkers sure don't like it when they become the stalkee. Can you explain that in English? -- Too stupid to understand it? That's a shame. No wonder your infatuated with me. No, I understand that it doesn't make any sense - just like YOUR post... What I don't understand is how your third sentence relates in any way to the other two or even the thread. How would this imaginary "infatuation" have any bearing on my understanding something Don posted? Remember, this was a response to Don, not you, Walter, as much as that might disturb your fragile, young mind. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Seriously Dan... I'm not sure I can make it any simplier or clearer... but lets try. a/ you stalk basskisser all the time b/ someone stalks you....you do not like it How's that...better? (insert theme to Twilight Zone) I guess you don't understand what "stalk" means, Don. Look it up. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#166
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: Don White wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message legroups.com... -- Getting a little upset, stalker? Funny...the stalkers sure don't like it when they become the stalkee. Can you explain that in English? -- Too stupid to understand it? That's a shame. No wonder your infatuated with me. No, I understand that it doesn't make any sense - just like YOUR post... What I don't understand is how your third sentence relates in any way to the other two or even the thread. How would this imaginary "infatuation" have any bearing on my understanding something Don posted? Easy. One's infatuation, when it's as extreme as yours consumes your thought process. It's kind of like being extremely in love, you just can't think straight. Remember, this was a response to Don, not you, Walter, as much as that might disturb your fragile, young mind. I'm not Walter, and I'm not young. You're just never correct, are you? -- Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy..... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY......... You can't spin it so you type pure BS. Nice try, Walter. If you aren't young then what is your excuse for constantly posting like a ten year old? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#167
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan wrote:
Don White wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: Don White wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... -- Getting a little upset, stalker? Funny...the stalkers sure don't like it when they become the stalkee. Can you explain that in English? -- Too stupid to understand it? That's a shame. No wonder your infatuated with me. No, I understand that it doesn't make any sense - just like YOUR post... What I don't understand is how your third sentence relates in any way to the other two or even the thread. How would this imaginary "infatuation" have any bearing on my understanding something Don posted? Remember, this was a response to Don, not you, Walter, as much as that might disturb your fragile, young mind. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Seriously Dan... I'm not sure I can make it any simplier or clearer... but lets try. a/ you stalk basskisser all the time b/ someone stalks you....you do not like it How's that...better? (insert theme to Twilight Zone) I guess you don't understand what "stalk" means, Don. Look it up. He doesn't understand the concept of "all the time" either. |
#168
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan wrote:
basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: Don White wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... -- Getting a little upset, stalker? Funny...the stalkers sure don't like it when they become the stalkee. Can you explain that in English? -- Too stupid to understand it? That's a shame. No wonder your infatuated with me. No, I understand that it doesn't make any sense - just like YOUR post... What I don't understand is how your third sentence relates in any way to the other two or even the thread. How would this imaginary "infatuation" have any bearing on my understanding something Don posted? Easy. One's infatuation, when it's as extreme as yours consumes your thought process. It's kind of like being extremely in love, you just can't think straight. Remember, this was a response to Don, not you, Walter, as much as that might disturb your fragile, young mind. I'm not Walter, and I'm not young. You're just never correct, are you? -- Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy..... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY......... You can't spin it so you type pure BS. Nice try, Walter. If you aren't young then what is your excuse for constantly posting like a ten year old? Age and mental capcity are different things. :-) |
#169
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: Don White wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message legroups.com... -- Getting a little upset, stalker? Funny...the stalkers sure don't like it when they become the stalkee. Can you explain that in English? -- Too stupid to understand it? That's a shame. No wonder your infatuated with me. No, I understand that it doesn't make any sense - just like YOUR post... What I don't understand is how your third sentence relates in any way to the other two or even the thread. How would this imaginary "infatuation" have any bearing on my understanding something Don posted? Easy. One's infatuation, when it's as extreme as yours consumes your thought process. It's kind of like being extremely in love, you just can't think straight. Remember, this was a response to Don, not you, Walter, as much as that might disturb your fragile, young mind. I'm not Walter, and I'm not young. You're just never correct, are you? -- Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy..... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY......... You can't spin it so you type pure BS. Nice try, Walter. If you aren't young then what is your excuse for constantly posting like a ten year old? -- Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY......... |
#170
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: Don White wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oglegroups.com... -- Getting a little upset, stalker? Funny...the stalkers sure don't like it when they become the stalkee. Can you explain that in English? -- Too stupid to understand it? That's a shame. No wonder your infatuated with me. No, I understand that it doesn't make any sense - just like YOUR post... What I don't understand is how your third sentence relates in any way to the other two or even the thread. How would this imaginary "infatuation" have any bearing on my understanding something Don posted? Easy. One's infatuation, when it's as extreme as yours consumes your thought process. It's kind of like being extremely in love, you just can't think straight. Remember, this was a response to Don, not you, Walter, as much as that might disturb your fragile, young mind. I'm not Walter, and I'm not young. You're just never correct, are you? -- Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy..... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY......... You can't spin it so you type pure BS. Nice try, Walter. If you aren't young then what is your excuse for constantly posting like a ten year old? -- Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY......... Typical, and as expected, from our resident lunatic. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Race for the Cure -- OVER THE TOP! | General | |||
To Donal, a friend and a worthy opponent | ASA | |||
Mooring Worthy? | ASA |