Wanted: Large Boat
 

Mike wrote:
*That* I don't get at all!

LOL! Ambiguity in the typewritten word. In case some folks didn't understand
the above. It did not mean thatI didn't get (understand) John H's post, in
fact I agree with it. It means, that I don't get why people continue to
argue with a rockpile like asskisser.

Your childish name calling and petty insults shows that you have no
credibility, and further more shows that you were indeed not able to
"get it", and to cover your tracks, resort to such.

Wanted: Large Boat
 

ACP wrote:
"Mike" wrote in message
t...
*That* I don't get at all!

LOL! in the typewritten word. In case some folks didn't understand the
above. It did not mean thatI didn't get (understand) John H's post, in
fact I agree with it. It means, that I don't get why people continue to
argue with a rockpile like asskisser.

--Mike

"Ambiguity".....you'll easier words than that to reach your intended
audience.

WTF???

Your infatuation with me is getting out of hand. You're not able to
make complete sentences anymore.

Wanted: Large Boat
 

Dan wrote:

Sure you did. If that's true and your "friend" read your posts, he is
as pathetic as you. Seriously.

Pathetic because we shared a huge laugh at your expense?

Infatuation......
Infatuation.....
It's driving Dan crazy....
It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY.......

Wanted: Large Boat
 

Mike wrote:
Sure you did. If that's true and your "friend" read your posts, he is
as pathetic as you. Seriously.

Some friend he is! When my friends come over, they want to watch a game, or
drink some beer, preferably both. Of course, that is if we aren't going out
in the boat. I couldn't even FATHOM having them sit down and read this crap.
Wow, that says a LOT about the poor boy.

Did I say that's all we did? This just shows that you always let your
mouth get in the way of sense. You posted the above in pure ignorance.
For your information (I doubt you'll "get it"!) we WERE having a beer,
I was showing him my latest flight sim software, shooting the breeze,
and I said to him, hey, check this out, I've got a stalker on
rec.boats! Now in your world that may have taken a full evening, but it
took me about two minutes, and we had a great laugh!

Wanted: Large Boat
 

Mike wrote:
It really was obvious what you meant, and all of us need to ignore those
whose sole purpose in coming to the NG is to cut and paste a newspaper
article to get into a silly ****ing contest.

You're absolutely right. I'm embarrassed that I slipped to his level. It's
funny though... I have him killfiled, and I still see his posts since I need
to read other postings, in case something relevant is added to the thread.

I've only been around here for a couple of years, and it's clear who's worth
reading, and who's not. So far, I only have one fella KF'd. g

To get back on topic, what Bill say's is correct. I don't care what the "on
the record" response is from the authorities; It's far from reality. In the
Delta (I live in the bay area and boat there as well), there are countless
boats scattered along the shores... abandoned. There's over a thousand miles
of waterways in the Sac River Delta, so it's a problem. Some (as Bill says)
are big suckers, barges and such. It seems to me that if the authorities
were actively chasing down the owners, that part of the punishment would be
removal of the vessel. But they sit there... stripped of anything useful,
and most likely would sink if they weren't grounded. To me, it gives the
area some character... it's not like it's garbage floating in the water. In
many cases, they are landmarks (watermarks?) as well. It is easy to get lost
out there if you don't have a GPS, or know the area.

--Mike

I've lived in the area also. So, are you saying, like Bill, that the
authorities condone this? Also, back to the original comment. If this
is true, why would Mythbusters have to solicit for a hull to play with?

Wanted: Large Boat
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

ACP wrote:
"Mike" wrote in message
t...
*That* I don't get at all!

LOL! in the typewritten word. In case some folks didn't understand the
above. It did not mean thatI didn't get (understand) John H's post, in
fact I agree with it. It means, that I don't get why people continue to
argue with a rockpile like asskisser.

--Mike

"Ambiguity".....you'll easier words than that to reach your intended
audience.

WTF???

Your infatuation with me is getting out of hand. You're not able to
make complete sentences anymore.

You're a great one to comment on sentence composition.

I think it's time for me to leave you alone. The fun is wearing off quickly
now.

One vision I'll carry in my mind is of you at your keyboard, hands trembling
with anger, trying to make cogent replies to your detractors.

If you'd only learn to admit that sometimes you just might be wrong. But
that takes a real man.

Bye....

PS ~ I'm sure your reply will be scathing.

Wanted: Large Boat
 

ACP wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

ACP wrote:
"Mike" wrote in message
t...
*That* I don't get at all!

LOL! in the typewritten word. In case some folks didn't understand the
above. It did not mean thatI didn't get (understand) John H's post, in
fact I agree with it. It means, that I don't get why people continue to
argue with a rockpile like asskisser.

--Mike

"Ambiguity".....you'll easier words than that to reach your intended
audience.

WTF???

Your infatuation with me is getting out of hand. You're not able to
make complete sentences anymore.

You're a great one to comment on sentence composition.

Thank you!

I think it's time for me to leave you alone. The fun is wearing off quickly
now.

Good. I'm glad you've come to grips with your infatuation towards me.
It's the first step in recovery. I can only hope that Dan does the
same.

One vision I'll carry in my mind is of you at your keyboard, hands trembling
with anger, trying to make cogent replies to your detractors.

See how easy it is for someone that has an infatuation complex to get
totally wrong and ignorant ideas in there head?

If you'd only learn to admit that sometimes you just might be wrong. But
that takes a real man.

I'm more of a man than you'll ever be.

Bye....

PS ~ I'm sure your reply will be scathing.

No, just honest.

Wanted: Large Boat
 

ACP wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

ACP wrote:

"Mike" wrote in message
.net...

*That* I don't get at all!

LOL! in the typewritten word. In case some folks didn't understand the
above. It did not mean thatI didn't get (understand) John H's post, in
fact I agree with it. It means, that I don't get why people continue to
argue with a rockpile like asskisser.

--Mike

"Ambiguity".....you'll easier words than that to reach your intended
audience.

WTF???

Your infatuation with me is getting out of hand. You're not able to
make complete sentences anymore.


You're a great one to comment on sentence composition.

I think it's time for me to leave you alone. The fun is wearing off quickly
now.

It took you this long???? :-)


One vision I'll carry in my mind is of you at your keyboard, hands trembling
with anger, trying to make cogent replies to your detractors.

If you'd only learn to admit that sometimes you just might be wrong. But
that takes a real man.

Bye....

PS ~ I'm sure your reply will be scathing.



Most likely it will be a repeat of something he has already said again
again. Kevin has never been a bright build in the marquee

Wanted: Large Boat
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Mike wrote:
It really was obvious what you meant, and all of us need to ignore
those
whose sole purpose in coming to the NG is to cut and paste a newspaper
article to get into a silly ****ing contest.

You're absolutely right. I'm embarrassed that I slipped to his level.
It's
funny though... I have him killfiled, and I still see his posts since I
need
to read other postings, in case something relevant is added to the
thread.

I've only been around here for a couple of years, and it's clear who's
worth
reading, and who's not. So far, I only have one fella KF'd. g

To get back on topic, what Bill say's is correct. I don't care what the
"on
the record" response is from the authorities; It's far from reality. In
the
Delta (I live in the bay area and boat there as well), there are
countless
boats scattered along the shores... abandoned. There's over a thousand
miles
of waterways in the Sac River Delta, so it's a problem. Some (as Bill
says)
are big suckers, barges and such. It seems to me that if the authorities
were actively chasing down the owners, that part of the punishment would
be
removal of the vessel. But they sit there... stripped of anything useful,
and most likely would sink if they weren't grounded. To me, it gives the
area some character... it's not like it's garbage floating in the water.
In
many cases, they are landmarks (watermarks?) as well. It is easy to get
lost
out there if you don't have a GPS, or know the area.

--Mike

I've lived in the area also. So, are you saying, like Bill, that the
authorities condone this? Also, back to the original comment. If this
is true, why would Mythbusters have to solicit for a hull to play with?


If you are into Karate, you have taken at least a thousand too many blows to
the brain. Or you took on a NYC taxi driver, who replied to your Karate
stance with a NYC taxi driver tire iron response. Myth Busters wants a
cheap hull. Why pay pay, when you can get one free, or almost free. All
those abandoned hulls in the Sac Delta, are not floating.

Wanted: Large Boat
 

animal wrote:


Most likely it will be a repeat of something he has already said again
again. Kevin has never been a *bright build in the marquee*

Just what does *bright build in the marquee* mean?