|
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message om... JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. Dan, it is just another of our sheriffs doing the 'do as I say, not as I do' routine. Jim, it's so good to see you back and doing NOTHING except stirring ****. You're certainly living up to your reputation as a complete ass. This post was brought to you by the boy who has posted "Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute!" several times for your enjoyment. If he didn't miss all of those days at school while tending his crops, he would know that "your" and "you're" are two different words and he chose the wrong one. What crops? Be specific. How do you know that I have any "crops"? What are they? Where are they? How big? -- This post was brought to you by the boy who has posted "Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute!" several times for your enjoyment. Vidalia onions and peaches? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:05:56 -0500, Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message .com... JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. My 'neat' replies to Harry's name-calling do not go on, and on, and on. He calls someone an asshole, I pay him a compliment. End of thread. I have basskisser killfiled. Responding to him is not feasible, except through another, and I don't think agitating him is worthwhile. -- John If he badgered and libeled you it would continue, John - you know that. Why not add Harry to your killfile since your policy seems to be to remove the source, not the targets? Damn that's funny!! You follow me to every post I make, accuse me of growing pot, accuse me of many, many other things, yet you feel "badgered and libeled"????? BWAAHAAA!!! Enjoy it while you can. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:42:14 -0500, Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:05:56 -0500, Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message .com... JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. My 'neat' replies to Harry's name-calling do not go on, and on, and on. He calls someone an asshole, I pay him a compliment. End of thread. I have basskisser killfiled. Responding to him is not feasible, except through another, and I don't think agitating him is worthwhile. -- John If he badgered and libeled you it would continue, John - you know that. Why not add Harry to your killfile since your policy seems to be to remove the source, not the targets? He badgers and libels you because you allow him to. As to the killfile, Harry and I do not go on, and on, and on, and on, saying the same thing to each other post after post and thread after thread and day after day and so on. He calls someone an asshole, I compliment him. End of thread. -- John You missed the mark. Kevin is the king of the four-line response among his other catch phrases of the week. I, and others, are able to respond appropriately and with limited repetition. You modify your "neat guy" response but your point is always the same. You are welcome to do and post what you want, but don't ask the rest of us to not do the same. dan -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:14:53 -0500, Dan
wrote: JohnH wrote: On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:42:14 -0500, Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:05:56 -0500, Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message s.com... JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. My 'neat' replies to Harry's name-calling do not go on, and on, and on. He calls someone an asshole, I pay him a compliment. End of thread. I have basskisser killfiled. Responding to him is not feasible, except through another, and I don't think agitating him is worthwhile. -- John If he badgered and libeled you it would continue, John - you know that. Why not add Harry to your killfile since your policy seems to be to remove the source, not the targets? He badgers and libels you because you allow him to. As to the killfile, Harry and I do not go on, and on, and on, and on, saying the same thing to each other post after post and thread after thread and day after day and so on. He calls someone an asshole, I compliment him. End of thread. -- John You missed the mark. Kevin is the king of the four-line response among his other catch phrases of the week. I, and others, are able to respond appropriately and with limited repetition. You modify your "neat guy" response but your point is always the same. You are welcome to do and post what you want, but don't ask the rest of us to not do the same. dan You go, Dan. You've earned everyone's high esteem because you can argue with basskisser endlessly. -- John |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. -- I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post and reply I make, and that's MY fault??? Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY...... I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you go to school? Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"? Guess not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy. Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute! Show me one thread in the last month that you haven't followed me to. Infatuation...... Infatuation..... It's driving Dan crazy.... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY.... Short memory, boy? I have nothing to prove to you and you continue to make this insane accusation. Post proof or retract. He rec.boats. And that proves you to be a liar. Nothing new so no surprise. -- How, stalker? |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. -- I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post and reply I make, and that's MY fault??? Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY...... I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you go to school? Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"? Guess not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy. Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute! Show me one thread in the last month that you haven't followed me to. Infatuation...... Infatuation..... It's driving Dan crazy.... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY.... Short memory, boy? I have nothing to prove to you and you continue to make this insane accusation. Post proof or retract. He rec.boats. And that proves you to be a liar. Nothing new so no surprise. -- How, stalker? I'm not clear on this. Are you calling me a stalker? Who am I stalking? Please be very specific. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. -- I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post and reply I make, and that's MY fault??? Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY...... I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you go to school? Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"? Guess not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy. Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute! Show me one thread in the last month that you haven't followed me to. Infatuation...... Infatuation..... It's driving Dan crazy.... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY.... Short memory, boy? I have nothing to prove to you and you continue to make this insane accusation. Post proof or retract. He rec.boats. And that proves you to be a liar. Nothing new so no surprise. -- How, stalker? I'm not clear on this. Are you calling me a stalker? Who am I stalking? Please be very specific. -- That's odd, you expect me to be "very specific" in answering your questions all the while avoiding mine. |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: Short memory, boy? I have nothing to prove to you and you continue to make this insane accusation. Post proof or retract. He rec.boats. And that proves you to be a liar. Nothing new so no surprise. -- How, stalker? I'm not clear on this. Are you calling me a stalker? Who am I stalking? Please be very specific. -- That's odd, you expect me to be "very specific" in answering your questions all the while avoiding mine. You aren't very smart, are you? A real man would be able to read and follow this thread. Do you give all of that pot to your sick friend, boy? IF you do then what's your excuse? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: Short memory, boy? I have nothing to prove to you and you continue to make this insane accusation. Post proof or retract. He rec.boats. And that proves you to be a liar. Nothing new so no surprise. -- How, stalker? I'm not clear on this. Are you calling me a stalker? Who am I stalking? Please be very specific. -- That's odd, you expect me to be "very specific" in answering your questions all the while avoiding mine. You aren't very smart, are you? A real man would be able to read and follow this thread. Do you give all of that pot to your sick friend, boy? IF you do then what's your excuse? -- This thread is *Wanted: Large Boat* What in hell does your above blather have to do with that? And why does your inability to answer my questions make you think that it's my fault for not following the thread, stalker? |
Wanted: Large Boat
An article on derelict boats in the Sac Delta.
http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/ci_4931714 |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com