Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,978
Default Arctic Ice Could Be Gone by 2040


Sam wrote:
"Sam" wrote in message news:f9egh.6653$HX4.4914@trnddc03...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...


As far as the above goes, I've stated that
the machine wouldn't be anymore effective with the ice in an ice chest
or in a cardboard box, because the water flowing across the ice would
melt the ice at the same rate. Then Sam started that childish name
calling. And STILL hasn't shown anything to the contrary.


I can prove it to you (yet again) if you agree to answer just a few
simple
yes or no questions.

Are you game?

Why would I need to answer any questions for you to prove it?


You'll prove it.

Ready?


There's nothing to be scared of- there just very simple yes or no questions.


Get this straight right now. I am nor will ever be scared of you. Got
it? Really, is that understood?
Why would someone need to ask questions if they have the intelligence
to prove their point?

  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Sam Sam is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 37
Default Arctic Ice Could Be Gone by 2040


"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Sam wrote:
"Sam" wrote in message news:f9egh.6653$HX4.4914@trnddc03...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...


As far as the above goes, I've stated that
the machine wouldn't be anymore effective with the ice in an ice
chest
or in a cardboard box, because the water flowing across the ice
would
melt the ice at the same rate. Then Sam started that childish name
calling. And STILL hasn't shown anything to the contrary.


I can prove it to you (yet again) if you agree to answer just a few
simple
yes or no questions.

Are you game?

Why would I need to answer any questions for you to prove it?

You'll prove it.

Ready?


There's nothing to be scared of- there just very simple yes or no
questions.


Get this straight right now. I am nor will ever be scared of you. Got
it? Really, is that understood?
Why would someone need to ask questions if they have the intelligence
to prove their point?


LOL!


  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,978
Default Arctic Ice Could Be Gone by 2040


Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Sam wrote:
"Sam" wrote in message news:f9egh.6653$HX4.4914@trnddc03...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...


As far as the above goes, I've stated that
the machine wouldn't be anymore effective with the ice in an ice
chest
or in a cardboard box, because the water flowing across the ice
would
melt the ice at the same rate. Then Sam started that childish name
calling. And STILL hasn't shown anything to the contrary.


I can prove it to you (yet again) if you agree to answer just a few
simple
yes or no questions.

Are you game?

Why would I need to answer any questions for you to prove it?

You'll prove it.

Ready?

There's nothing to be scared of- there just very simple yes or no
questions.


Get this straight right now. I am nor will ever be scared of you. Got
it? Really, is that understood?
Why would someone need to ask questions if they have the intelligence
to prove their point?


LOL!



Can't answer the question, huh? Moron.

  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Sam Sam is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 37
Default Arctic Ice Could Be Gone by 2040


"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Sam wrote:
"Sam" wrote in message
news:f9egh.6653$HX4.4914@trnddc03...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...


As far as the above goes, I've stated that
the machine wouldn't be anymore effective with the ice in an ice
chest
or in a cardboard box, because the water flowing across the ice
would
melt the ice at the same rate. Then Sam started that childish
name
calling. And STILL hasn't shown anything to the contrary.


I can prove it to you (yet again) if you agree to answer just a
few
simple
yes or no questions.

Are you game?

Why would I need to answer any questions for you to prove it?

You'll prove it.

Ready?

There's nothing to be scared of- there just very simple yes or no
questions.

Get this straight right now. I am nor will ever be scared of you. Got
it? Really, is that understood?
Why would someone need to ask questions if they have the intelligence
to prove their point?


LOL!



Can't answer the question, huh? Moron.


I have proved my point.

Scared to answer a few questions?

LOL!


  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,978
Default Arctic Ice Could Be Gone by 2040


Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Sam wrote:
"Sam" wrote in message
news:f9egh.6653$HX4.4914@trnddc03...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...


As far as the above goes, I've stated that
the machine wouldn't be anymore effective with the ice in an ice
chest
or in a cardboard box, because the water flowing across the ice
would
melt the ice at the same rate. Then Sam started that childish
name
calling. And STILL hasn't shown anything to the contrary.


I can prove it to you (yet again) if you agree to answer just a
few
simple
yes or no questions.

Are you game?

Why would I need to answer any questions for you to prove it?

You'll prove it.

Ready?

There's nothing to be scared of- there just very simple yes or no
questions.

Get this straight right now. I am nor will ever be scared of you. Got
it? Really, is that understood?
Why would someone need to ask questions if they have the intelligence
to prove their point?


LOL!



Can't answer the question, huh? Moron.


I have proved my point.

Scared to answer a few questions?


No.

LOL!


You are one of the very few people that are allegedly above the age of
12 who still use those silly LOL's and such. You realize this don't you?



  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 40
Default Arctic Ice Could Be Gone by 2040

basskisser wrote:

You are one of the very few people that are allegedly above the age of
12 who still use those silly LOL's and such. You realize this don't you?


(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
So you do actually believe that the rings
above the bottom one have NO lubrication.


basskisser replied:

*LOL* where did I say that?



Since you don't use LOL anymore, you must be 13 now. Puberty messing you up?

-- Charlie
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,978
Default Arctic Ice Could Be Gone by 2040


Charlie wrote:
basskisser wrote:

You are one of the very few people that are allegedly above the age of
12 who still use those silly LOL's and such. You realize this don't you?


(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
So you do actually believe that the rings
above the bottom one have NO lubrication.


basskisser replied:

*LOL* where did I say that?

BWAAAHAAAA!!!!!!! I was COPYING Shelikoff because of HIS childish use
of LOL!!!!!!!! Notice the * on each side?? Nice try, thanks for playing!

  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Sam Sam is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 37
Default Arctic Ice Could Be Gone by 2040


"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Sam wrote:
"Sam" wrote in message
news:f9egh.6653$HX4.4914@trnddc03...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...


As far as the above goes, I've stated that
the machine wouldn't be anymore effective with the ice in an
ice
chest
or in a cardboard box, because the water flowing across the
ice
would
melt the ice at the same rate. Then Sam started that childish
name
calling. And STILL hasn't shown anything to the contrary.


I can prove it to you (yet again) if you agree to answer just a
few
simple
yes or no questions.

Are you game?

Why would I need to answer any questions for you to prove it?

You'll prove it.

Ready?

There's nothing to be scared of- there just very simple yes or no
questions.

Get this straight right now. I am nor will ever be scared of you.
Got
it? Really, is that understood?
Why would someone need to ask questions if they have the
intelligence
to prove their point?


LOL!


Can't answer the question, huh? Moron.


I have proved my point.

Scared to answer a few questions?


No.

LOL!


You are one of the very few people that are allegedly above the age of
12 who still use those silly LOL's and such. You realize this don't you?


LOL!


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Book on Arctic voyage 1905-1906 Josephi Marsdon UK Power Boats 1 April 9th 11 02:25 PM
Arctic Ice Melting basskisser General 20 September 21st 06 12:28 PM
Check out this book about a 1905 voyage to the Arctic Josephi Marsdon ASA 2 August 24th 06 10:03 PM
HAM and SSB Frequencies Bill Cruising 5 August 18th 05 08:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017