Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:
Well, I take it that you don't believe the article? Prove the writer
wrong. I'll be waiting.



I love you too, man. Peace.

What an intelligent and well thought reply.....NOT.......

I take it that although you have no science to repute the article, you
must goose step to the party and try to negate it, huh?

(refute??)


I prefer the two-step. Goose stepping just looks gay, especially at a party.

I take it that you aren't quite bright enough to provide any
information to back up your statements. So, instead you try to act
humorous and homophobic.