I'm understanding that you said you would wait to prove the scientist
wrong. the year 2040? I believe that is 34 years away.

can you wait that long? or are you placing your bets now?


basskisser wrote:
Tim wrote:
No. No I'm not, and your petty accusations does nothing for your
credibility.


Then you are grossly mistaken. It wouldn't take someone 34 years to
prove the scientists in the article wrong. Now are you mistaken, or do
you just not undestand that?