On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:52:25 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 12/12/2006 5:57 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006 09:22:50 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...NGE5MTQ211.DTL
Here 'ya go Bassy - instead of the sfgate, try some real science fro
the experts.

Small snippet:

"Analysis of records (Figures 2, 3) also shows that long-term ice
trends are small and generally not statistically significant (at 95%
level), while trends for shorter records are not indicative of the
long-term tendencies due to large-amplitude LFO."

http://www.frontier.iarc.uaf.edu/~ig.../ice/index.php
Tom,
You do know you are debating an issue with someone who believes Schnapps
is a whiskey, even though the source he cited to prove his point stated
Whiskey must be aged in charred oak barrels to be considered a whiskey.

Do you really think you will be able to convince him of anything? Do
you really think you can have an intellectual debate with Bassy


And thus "Reggie" continues in his flaming ass ways...

Hi, Harry!

This was just to give you some of the attention you're obviously lacking.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*