Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Don White wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 18:17:59 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...

Wow! Three islands saved from development and left for boaters to
enjoy. It doesn't get any better than this.
see.. 'Surprise Announcement'
www.mahoneislands.ns.ca

note: a number of islands have been bought up by 'rich Americans'
in the last few years...some completely stripped of forestry and
signs erected warning locals to stay away.


Then maybe rich Canadians should buy the islands and donate to a
nature conservancy?



I wondered who were the dumb asses that sold the islands to those
horrible
rich Americans!



Greedy people blinded by that yankee dollah.


Don, don't you just hate those rich son of a bitches?

I see that sort of crap all the time with developments I work on. The
surrounding neighbors pour into the Planning Commision meetings whining
about how they use 'X' piece of land for picnics etc, and how we should
not be allowed to develop it. They never want to buy it, even when
offered. They just want to continue to leach off of others. Why am I
not surprised that donny is of the same ilk?

On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 07:11:20 -0500, P Fritz wrote:


I see that sort of crap all the time with developments I work on. The
surrounding neighbors pour into the Planning Commision meetings whining
about how they use 'X' piece of land for picnics etc, and how we should
not be allowed to develop it. They never want to buy it, even when
offered. They just want to continue to leach off of others. Why am I
not surprised that donny is of the same ilk?

Nor does it surprise me that one of your ilk is incapable of
understanding anything past the end of your nose. Nova Scotia is not the
United States. The Right to Roam is a traditional concept cherished by
many Nova Scotians, not just Don.

http://ccns.chebucto.org/Right_to_Roam.pdf

thunder wrote:
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 07:11:20 -0500, P Fritz wrote:


I see that sort of crap all the time with developments I work on. The
surrounding neighbors pour into the Planning Commision meetings whining
about how they use 'X' piece of land for picnics etc, and how we should
not be allowed to develop it. They never want to buy it, even when
offered. They just want to continue to leach off of others. Why am I
not surprised that donny is of the same ilk?

Nor does it surprise me that one of your ilk is incapable of
understanding anything past the end of your nose. Nova Scotia is not the
United States. The Right to Roam is a traditional concept cherished by
many Nova Scotians, not just Don.

http://ccns.chebucto.org/Right_to_Roam.pdf

There is a certain set of people who just can't understand any concept
that isn't as you say, right in front of their noses. These people only
believe what the RNC tells them to believe.

basskisser wrote:


There is a certain set of people who just can't understand any concept
that isn't as you say, right in front of their noses. These people only
believe what the RNC tells them to believe.

Scoring the thread.

Two points Basskisser. One for an insulting remark and a second for a
political reference to the RNC.

Subtotals so far:

Personal remarks: Don White, P Fritz, Thunder (one each)
Insults: John H, Don White, Basskisser (one each)
Argumentative challenges: JohnH 1, Reggie Smithers 3
Catty remarks: Don White, 1
Political Statements: JohnH 1, Don White 1, Eisboch 1, Fritz 1,
Basskisser 1

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...


Subtotals so far:

Personal remarks: Don White, P Fritz, Thunder (one each)
Insults: John H, Don White, Basskisser (one each)
Argumentative challenges: JohnH 1, Reggie Smithers 3
Catty remarks: Don White, 1
Political Statements: JohnH 1, Don White 1, Eisboch 1, Fritz 1,
Basskisser 1


And the winner..... by a landslide!

Da -ta-ta- da ......

Chuck Gould .... with over 15 sarcastic comments on thread that otherwise
did not involve him.

Congratulations, Chuck.

Eisboch

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...


Subtotals so far:

Personal remarks: Don White, P Fritz, Thunder (one each)
Insults: John H, Don White, Basskisser (one each)
Argumentative challenges: JohnH 1, Reggie Smithers 3
Catty remarks: Don White, 1
Political Statements: JohnH 1, Don White 1, Eisboch 1, Fritz 1,
Basskisser 1


And the winner..... by a landslide!

Da -ta-ta- da ......

Chuck Gould .... with over 15 sarcastic comments on thread that otherwise
did not involve him.

Congratulations, Chuck.

Eisboch

For those keeping score1 point = 1 chuckie dot.
Chuck; You are just a few points or dots away from the big PLONK! Keep up
the good work.
Jim

Eisboch wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...


Subtotals so far:

Personal remarks: Don White, P Fritz, Thunder (one each)
Insults: John H, Don White, Basskisser (one each)
Argumentative challenges: JohnH 1, Reggie Smithers 3
Catty remarks: Don White, 1
Political Statements: JohnH 1, Don White 1, Eisboch 1, Fritz 1,
Basskisser 1


And the winner..... by a landslide!

Da -ta-ta- da ......

Chuck Gould .... with over 15 sarcastic comments on thread that otherwise
did not involve him.

Congratulations, Chuck.

Eisboch

At least I did not hypocritically claim that I "wasn't following" the
thread.

How truly amazing that you and the other combatants in this thing would
post your nasty, snide, and inflammatory comments in a public forum and
then get all ****y when somebody
keeps track of who said what.

Chuck Gould wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...


Subtotals so far:

Personal remarks: Don White, P Fritz, Thunder (one each)
Insults: John H, Don White, Basskisser (one each)
Argumentative challenges: JohnH 1, Reggie Smithers 3
Catty remarks: Don White, 1
Political Statements: JohnH 1, Don White 1, Eisboch 1, Fritz 1,
Basskisser 1

And the winner..... by a landslide!

Da -ta-ta- da ......

Chuck Gould .... with over 15 sarcastic comments on thread that otherwise
did not involve him.

Congratulations, Chuck.

Eisboch

At least I did not hypocritically claim that I "wasn't following" the
thread.

How truly amazing that you and the other combatants in this thing would
post your nasty, snide, and inflammatory comments in a public forum and
then get all ****y when somebody
keeps track of who said what.

Chuck,
I think you did a great job in reviving a thread that had died a natural
death.

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...

Eisboch wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...


Subtotals so far:

Personal remarks: Don White, P Fritz, Thunder (one each)
Insults: John H, Don White, Basskisser (one each)
Argumentative challenges: JohnH 1, Reggie Smithers 3
Catty remarks: Don White, 1
Political Statements: JohnH 1, Don White 1, Eisboch 1, Fritz 1,
Basskisser 1


And the winner..... by a landslide!

Da -ta-ta- da ......

Chuck Gould .... with over 15 sarcastic comments on thread that otherwise
did not involve him.

Congratulations, Chuck.

Eisboch

At least I did not hypocritically claim that I "wasn't following" the
thread.

How truly amazing that you and the other combatants in this thing would
post your nasty, snide, and inflammatory comments in a public forum and
then get all ****y when somebody
keeps track of who said what.


My single post related to this thread was "nasty, snide, and inflammatory"?
You make tough rules, Chuck.

Eisboch

On 5 Dec 2006 08:36:50 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

snippity-snip

How truly amazing that you and the other combatants in this thing would
post your nasty, snide, and inflammatory comments in a public forum and
then get all ****y when somebody
keeps track of who said what.

It's Hard-Water season Chuck. It happens every year around this time.
Sorry to belabor the obvious, but someone had to say it. )
Mark E. Williams