Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Duke Nukem wrote:
On 29 Nov 2006 04:46:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:

You screwed up once again, by not
comprehending what you've read, once again
Oh my god, Bassy is chiding somebody on reading comprehension.

Freakin' amazing.

Show me where I've failed to comprehend anything........
I'll be waiting, Tom

Bassy,
I won't bother to google them up, but many times you have posted links
that are the exact opposite of the point you were trying to make.

Please, do it. I'd love to see.


Okay, my question was, how could the
lights possibly be specifically for Christmas, because they didn't even
HAVE electric lights then.

And then later you say that they had Christmas lights before electricity.

Damn it, it gets hard to get things into your brain! The electric
lights could stand for ANYTHING, NOT SPECIFICALLY FOR CHRISTMAS.......

Yes, I never, ever, ever said that they didn't have any Christmas
lights before electricity. They however, didn't have electric lights
(the kind Chuck is putting on his boat *there's a hint for you!!*) when
Jesus was allegedly born. SO, how could electric lights possibly be
specifically for Christmas??????? Does this mean my flashlight is a
symbol of the birth of Christ???