oh sh*t
 

basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test.

For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are
dumbing yourself down again.

ps - Bassy, I am playing with you because you are taking this thing way
to serious. You really do need to sit back and enjoy life and not go
looking for a fight on every post. The OP comment was a comment made in
passing, it was not meant to be taken as the gospel.

oh sh*t
 

basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test.
For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are
dumbing yourself down again.

80% is a B, isn't that good?

Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even
MORE, can't you?

OK, but 80% is better than 70%.

oh sh*t
 

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test.

For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are
dumbing yourself down again.

ps - Bassy, I am playing with you because you are taking this thing way
to serious. You really do need to sit back and enjoy life and not go
looking for a fight on every post. The OP comment was a comment made in
passing, it was not meant to be taken as the gospel.

No, but it was a knee jerk response. Most intelligent people THINK
before they make comments like JimH made. He does so consitently here.
Not long ago, he made a comment about a boating accident saying that
the people must have been drunk rednecks. Neither was the case.

oh sh*t
 

On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test.
For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are
dumbing yourself down again.

80% is a B, isn't that good?

Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even
MORE, can't you?

OK, but 80% is better than 70%.

Cite?

oh sh*t
 

JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test.
For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are
dumbing yourself down again.

80% is a B, isn't that good?
Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even
MORE, can't you?

OK, but 80% is better than 70%.

Cite?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage

oh sh*t
 

"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message
. ..
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test.
For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are
dumbing yourself down again.

80% is a B, isn't that good?
Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even
MORE, can't you?

OK, but 80% is better than 70%.

Cite?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage



So 35% unemployment is better than 4.5%?

oh sh*t
 

Calif Bill wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message
. ..
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test.
For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are
dumbing yourself down again.

80% is a B, isn't that good?
Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even
MORE, can't you?

OK, but 80% is better than 70%.
Cite?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage



So 35% unemployment is better than 4.5%?



Always, 35 is better than 4. See how easy this is.

oh sh*t
 

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:09:17 -0500, JohnH wrote:


On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington
wrote:


JimH wrote:

"Ron" wrote in message
. ..


Hows this for docking ?

http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720

quite the bass boat :-)
Ron in BC


Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal.




I thought this looked familiar:

http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html

Capt Jack R..

So who got the speed right?


Everybody - I think the consensus is that he was going too freakin'
fast.

Yea - and the guy who got the speed wrong was the driver :-)

Capt Jack R..

oh sh*t
 

JimH wrote:

Dan wrote:

JohnH wrote:


On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington
wrote:



JimH wrote:


"Ron" wrote in message
...



Hows this for docking ?

http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720

quite the bass boat :-)
Ron in BC


Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal.




I thought this looked familiar:

http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html

Capt Jack R..


So who got the speed right?

You will have to wait for the human radar to log back on. My guess is
8:00 or later on Monday...



That boy is easily wound up over nothing.


I could be wrong, but I think the driver fell out of the boat. And that
the boat was new. of course all the warranties expired on impact. I was
just glad no one was killed. and there was one less nut on the lake we
enjoy - for awhile anyway..

Capt Jack R..

oh sh*t
 

On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:13:44 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

Calif Bill wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message
. ..
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test.
For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are
dumbing yourself down again.

80% is a B, isn't that good?
Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even
MORE, can't you?

OK, but 80% is better than 70%.
Cite?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage



So 35% unemployment is better than 4.5%?



Always, 35 is better than 4. See how easy this is.

Where'd he go?

Anyway, your lesson on percents from wikipedia was a knee jerk reaction. It
didn't prove that 80% was better than 70%, it just said it was bigger.
Bigger is not necessarily better, even if Paris Hilton says so.