|
oh sh*t
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:41:44 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? I asked the same question, I think it must be higher, maybe 110. 186,000 miles per second? Tom, that sounds like an idiotic knee-jerk reaction to me. ;) |
oh sh*t
JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message .. . Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. I thought this looked familiar: http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html Capt Jack R.. So who got the speed right? You will have to wait for the human radar to log back on. My guess is 8:00 or later on Monday... |
oh sh*t
JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. I thought this looked familiar: http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html Capt Jack R.. So who got the speed right? OH damn, he was doing 80 mph, I guess 100. |
oh sh*t
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. |
oh sh*t
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. I thought this looked familiar: http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html It goes to prove two things Jack. 1 - There is nothing new on the Internet. 2 - The idiot wasn't going 186,000 miles per second. :) It proves a lot more than that. It proves that all of you knee-jerkers were wrong, it wasn't in a canal, it was on Lake Hartwell. You see, I KNEW this, so I loved watching you knee jerkers proving your ignorance! |
oh sh*t
Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message .. . Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. I thought this looked familiar: http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html Capt Jack R.. So who got the speed right? You will have to wait for the human radar to log back on. My guess is 8:00 or later on Monday... That boy is easily wound up over nothing. |
oh sh*t
basskisser wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. My knee did not jerk when I typed "100 mph". |
oh sh*t
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. My knee did not jerk when I typed "100 mph". And your brain didn't engage, neither. |
oh sh*t
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. My knee did not jerk when I typed "100 mph". And your brain didn't engage, neither. But I was only 20% off, so I should get an 80 on the test. |
oh sh*t
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:15:29 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: basskisser wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. My knee did not jerk when I typed "100 mph". I wonder if basskisser realizes the maturity level he portrays. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com