"Bo Raxo" wrote in message
oups.com...

-L. wrote:
Bo Raxo wrote:
snip


Nope, you say we might as well throw that life away as garbage. Must
be great to be able to see in to the future and know with such
certainty whether a person will ever be able to change and ever be
able
to do any good for his fellow man. I don't know where one finds such
certainty about human nature and the future, but somehow I think it
comes from a place to which I wouldn't want to go.


Bo Raxo

I am normally anti-death penalty, but I have one name for you. Timothy
Buss. Google it.


And life without parole wouldn't have worked as well? These days, a
crime like his would have gotten LWOP - sentences used to be lighter 30
years ago. And even murderers eligible for parole almost never get it
granted - not since Willie Horton.

Yes, his crime was heinous. That doesn't change the moral calculus of
whether it is right to kill people. It isn't. He tortured his second
victim, and raped him. Would you sentence him to torture? Would you
sentence him to rape? If those things aren't right, why is the killing
part right? Because it satisfies your rage?


No, listen carefully. BECAUSE IT FIXES THINGS SO HE CAN NEVER AGAIN HURT
ANYONE ELSE, period.

You can *project* this rage if you choose. If it makes you feel better than
those of us who don't agree with you. But that's all it is, projection.
I've told you a hundred times, it has absolutely NOTHING to do with rage or
revenge. It has to do with safety. With being ABSOLUTLEY POSITIVE that
this scum will never again hurt anyone else. He will never have the chance
or opportunity to harm another innocent being, EVER. period.


td


Bo Raxo