Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Calif Bill wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: I have never checked into US customs when returning from a stay at Leamington, Canada. When returning from Canada by car you go through a US Customs checkpoint. When returning from Canada by boat you go to your marina. ;-) Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass the fuel dock. Do not collect $200. :-) http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/...asureboats.doc In San Diego, you are to check in with customs even if you do not land in Mexican waters. You can check in by phone, but you must check in. Checking in by phone, under the I-68 and NEXUS provisions has become far more restrictive in the last couple of years and will become even more difficult in 2007. You will almost certainly need to appear with a passport to obtain an I-68 or NEXUS clearance, if you can get one, and you will need a clearance number for everybody aboard. Even when reporting by telephone, Customs has the option to require you to present yourself and your vessel for physical inspection at a customs port of entry- and I think you had darn well better have your passports. JimH has been unknowingly violating the law, and it sounds as if he is under the impression that most of his marina neighbors do the same thing. I guess if I were a terrorist trying to get into the US from Canada, I'd try to land at a private marina in Ohio. Nobody there apparently cares about customs regulations. :-) |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: I have never checked into US customs when returning from a stay at Leamington, Canada. When returning from Canada by car you go through a US Customs checkpoint. When returning from Canada by boat you go to your marina. ;-) Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass the fuel dock. Do not collect $200. :-) http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/...asureboats.doc In San Diego, you are to check in with customs even if you do not land in Mexican waters. You can check in by phone, but you must check in. Checking in by phone, under the I-68 and NEXUS provisions has become far more restrictive in the last couple of years and will become even more difficult in 2007. You will almost certainly need to appear with a passport to obtain an I-68 or NEXUS clearance, if you can get one, and you will need a clearance number for everybody aboard. Even when reporting by telephone, Customs has the option to require you to present yourself and your vessel for physical inspection at a customs port of entry- and I think you had darn well better have your passports. JimH has been unknowingly violating the law, and it sounds as if he is under the impression that most of his marina neighbors do the same thing. I guess if I were a terrorist trying to get into the US from Canada, I'd try to land at a private marina in Ohio. Nobody there apparently cares about customs regulations. :-) Checking in by phone is probably more restrictive in Washington than San Diego. As most of the boats fishing MX waters do not make landfall. It is only 13 miles to the Coronado Islands and the offshore banks are further out. Almost have to get to Ensenada to dock. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Calif Bill wrote: Checking in by phone is probably more restrictive in Washington than San Diego. As most of the boats fishing MX waters do not make landfall. It is only 13 miles to the Coronado Islands and the offshore banks are further out. Almost have to get to Ensenada to dock. I suspect the laws are probably the same. I never heard of the Customs regulations being regionally specific, and if you check the pamphlet I linked for JimH you will see that everything is referred to on a national basis. Expect a much tougher time checking in by phone after the end of this year. It's all part of the war on terror, I guess. If we get all the border agents spending a lot more time hassling the honest people that follow the law and report, that should make it all the easier for the dishonest n'er do wells to sneak across undetected. That said, it *was* a customs officer that made the stop in Port Angeles in late December 1999 that snagged the guy headed to Los Angeles to blow up the airport, or something, on Y2k day. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Calif Bill wrote: Checking in by phone is probably more restrictive in Washington than San Diego. As most of the boats fishing MX waters do not make landfall. It is only 13 miles to the Coronado Islands and the offshore banks are further out. Almost have to get to Ensenada to dock. In fact, here's a link that outlines the new customs requirements in January 2007 for all "air and sea" travel from other North American countries to the US. Travelers arriving by private car get another year before the full force of the new regs kick in. http://travel.state.gov/travel/cbpmc/cbpmc_2223.html |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: I have never checked into US customs when returning from a stay at Leamington, Canada. When returning from Canada by car you go through a US Customs checkpoint. When returning from Canada by boat you go to your marina. ;-) Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass the fuel dock. Do not collect $200. :-) http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/...asureboats.doc In San Diego, you are to check in with customs even if you do not land in Mexican waters. You can check in by phone, but you must check in. Checking in by phone, under the I-68 and NEXUS provisions has become far more restrictive in the last couple of years and will become even more difficult in 2007. You will almost certainly need to appear with a passport to obtain an I-68 or NEXUS clearance, if you can get one, and you will need a clearance number for everybody aboard. Even when reporting by telephone, Customs has the option to require you to present yourself and your vessel for physical inspection at a customs port of entry- and I think you had darn well better have your passports. JimH has been unknowingly violating the law, and it sounds as if he is under the impression that most of his marina neighbors do the same thing. No, I used to *knowingly* violate the law. But that was pre 9-11 and I have not been back to Canada via boat since then. This whole thing of checking in is on the honors system and virtually unenforceable. And we all know that terrorist will abide by the law and voluntarily check in.........eh? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JimH wrote: This whole thing of checking in is on the honors system and virtually unenforceable. And we all know that terrorist will abide by the law and voluntarily check in.........eh? No, it isn't an "honor system", and had you been caught your boat would or could have been seized, you would be subject to fines of tens of thousands of dollars, and quite possibly face some jail time. I believe smuggling and/or eluding customs officers is a felony, not a misdemeanor. You also should have been reporting into Canadian customs when you arrived in Canada. If there is no customs office near your marina or between your marina and the Canadian port, boaters need to sign up for an I-68 or NEXUS privilege where you make the arrangements in advance to report by telephone. In my experience it is much easier for a US boat to bet into Canada than it is for a US boat to get back into the US. (PS, you might want to be cautious about posting "I knowingly violated the Customs laws prior to 9-11" in a public forum). |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: This whole thing of checking in is on the honors system and virtually unenforceable. And we all know that terrorist will abide by the law and voluntarily check in.........eh? No, it isn't an "honor system", and had you been caught your boat would or could have been seized, you would be subject to fines of tens of thousands of dollars, and quite possibly face some jail time. You also should have been reporting into Canadian customs when you arrived in Canada. I did. ;-) |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JimH wrote: You also should have been reporting into Canadian customs when you arrived in Canada. I did. ;-) Here's something interesting to consider, then. The US and Canadian Customs share computer data about arriving and departing vessels. I was standing in a US customs office waiting to report and I overheard a phone conversation in which a customs agent was detailing all of the previous border crossings for a specific vessel going back about ten years or more previously. What struck me as odd was that the US agent knew exactly when the vessel entered Canada over the years- data that would not have been available except through Canadian customs because as you know we are not required to "check out". If you're on the Canadian database as checking "in" to Canada and not on the US database as having "returned" to the US, the evidence to make life a bit awkward for you is alive and kicking. This is exactly the sort of thing that can come back and bite you in the butt someday. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: You also should have been reporting into Canadian customs when you arrived in Canada. I did. ;-) Here's something interesting to consider, then. The US and Canadian Customs share computer data about arriving and departing vessels. I was standing in a US customs office waiting to report and I overheard a phone conversation in which a customs agent was detailing all of the previous border crossings for a specific vessel going back about ten years or more previously. What struck me as odd was that the US agent knew exactly when the vessel entered Canada over the years- data that would not have been available except through Canadian customs because as you know we are not required to "check out". If you're on the Canadian database as checking "in" to Canada and not on the US database as having "returned" to the US, the evidence to make life a bit awkward for you is alive and kicking. This is exactly the sort of thing that can come back and bite you in the butt someday. Hey I am one of those people who like living on the edge. I might even cross a street outside of a designated crosswalk area and or drive over the designated speed limit. The bottom line is that I survived and don't stay awake at night worrying about it. I doubt that the terrorists do either. ;-) |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: This whole thing of checking in is on the honors system and virtually unenforceable. And we all know that terrorist will abide by the law and voluntarily check in.........eh? No, it isn't an "honor system", and had you been caught your boat would or could have been seized, you would be subject to fines of tens of thousands of dollars, and quite possibly face some jail time. That should sure stop the terrorists from coming in.....eh? ;-) |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Dictionary of Paddling Terms :-) | Touring | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Essentials of a Marine Boat Alarm System | Electronics | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General |