Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: I have never checked into US customs when returning from a stay at Leamington, Canada. When returning from Canada by car you go through a US Customs checkpoint. When returning from Canada by boat you go to your marina. ;-) Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass the fuel dock. Do not collect $200. :-) http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/...asureboats.doc In San Diego, you are to check in with customs even if you do not land in Mexican waters. You can check in by phone, but you must check in. Checking in by phone, under the I-68 and NEXUS provisions has become far more restrictive in the last couple of years and will become even more difficult in 2007. You will almost certainly need to appear with a passport to obtain an I-68 or NEXUS clearance, if you can get one, and you will need a clearance number for everybody aboard. Even when reporting by telephone, Customs has the option to require you to present yourself and your vessel for physical inspection at a customs port of entry- and I think you had darn well better have your passports. JimH has been unknowingly violating the law, and it sounds as if he is under the impression that most of his marina neighbors do the same thing. No, I used to *knowingly* violate the law. But that was pre 9-11 and I have not been back to Canada via boat since then. This whole thing of checking in is on the honors system and virtually unenforceable. And we all know that terrorist will abide by the law and voluntarily check in.........eh? |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JimH wrote: This whole thing of checking in is on the honors system and virtually unenforceable. And we all know that terrorist will abide by the law and voluntarily check in.........eh? No, it isn't an "honor system", and had you been caught your boat would or could have been seized, you would be subject to fines of tens of thousands of dollars, and quite possibly face some jail time. I believe smuggling and/or eluding customs officers is a felony, not a misdemeanor. You also should have been reporting into Canadian customs when you arrived in Canada. If there is no customs office near your marina or between your marina and the Canadian port, boaters need to sign up for an I-68 or NEXUS privilege where you make the arrangements in advance to report by telephone. In my experience it is much easier for a US boat to bet into Canada than it is for a US boat to get back into the US. (PS, you might want to be cautious about posting "I knowingly violated the Customs laws prior to 9-11" in a public forum). |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: This whole thing of checking in is on the honors system and virtually unenforceable. And we all know that terrorist will abide by the law and voluntarily check in.........eh? No, it isn't an "honor system", and had you been caught your boat would or could have been seized, you would be subject to fines of tens of thousands of dollars, and quite possibly face some jail time. You also should have been reporting into Canadian customs when you arrived in Canada. I did. ;-) |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: This whole thing of checking in is on the honors system and virtually unenforceable. And we all know that terrorist will abide by the law and voluntarily check in.........eh? No, it isn't an "honor system", and had you been caught your boat would or could have been seized, you would be subject to fines of tens of thousands of dollars, and quite possibly face some jail time. That should sure stop the terrorists from coming in.....eh? ;-) |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's a bit futile in my opinion. Both of our land borders with Mexico
and Canada are just too large to really stop a determined person from crossing them unobserved. We need another way to deal with the terrorism problem. I noticed this summer while I was in Europe that I still was able to travel quite freely between different countries. I passed through a lot of border points but never had to produce a passport. At one point I was renting an apt about 5 klicks from the swiss italy border and went back and forth between the two countries several times a day. JimH wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: This whole thing of checking in is on the honors system and virtually unenforceable. And we all know that terrorist will abide by the law and voluntarily check in.........eh? No, it isn't an "honor system", and had you been caught your boat would or could have been seized, you would be subject to fines of tens of thousands of dollars, and quite possibly face some jail time. That should sure stop the terrorists from coming in.....eh? ;-) |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JimH wrote: You also should have been reporting into Canadian customs when you arrived in Canada. I did. ;-) Here's something interesting to consider, then. The US and Canadian Customs share computer data about arriving and departing vessels. I was standing in a US customs office waiting to report and I overheard a phone conversation in which a customs agent was detailing all of the previous border crossings for a specific vessel going back about ten years or more previously. What struck me as odd was that the US agent knew exactly when the vessel entered Canada over the years- data that would not have been available except through Canadian customs because as you know we are not required to "check out". If you're on the Canadian database as checking "in" to Canada and not on the US database as having "returned" to the US, the evidence to make life a bit awkward for you is alive and kicking. This is exactly the sort of thing that can come back and bite you in the butt someday. |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() jamesgangnc wrote: It's a bit futile in my opinion. Both of our land borders with Mexico and Canada are just too large to really stop a determined person from crossing them unobserved. We need another way to deal with the terrorism problem. I noticed this summer while I was in Europe that I still was able to travel quite freely between different countries. I passed through a lot of border points but never had to produce a passport. At one point I was renting an apt about 5 klicks from the swiss italy border and went back and forth between the two countries several times a day. Customs regulations are primarily designed to stop smugglers and illegal immigrants, (ha!), not deter terrorism. In fact, the primary mission of customs is to make sure that all goods coming into the country are taxed. |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: You also should have been reporting into Canadian customs when you arrived in Canada. I did. ;-) Here's something interesting to consider, then. The US and Canadian Customs share computer data about arriving and departing vessels. I was standing in a US customs office waiting to report and I overheard a phone conversation in which a customs agent was detailing all of the previous border crossings for a specific vessel going back about ten years or more previously. What struck me as odd was that the US agent knew exactly when the vessel entered Canada over the years- data that would not have been available except through Canadian customs because as you know we are not required to "check out". If you're on the Canadian database as checking "in" to Canada and not on the US database as having "returned" to the US, the evidence to make life a bit awkward for you is alive and kicking. This is exactly the sort of thing that can come back and bite you in the butt someday. Hey I am one of those people who like living on the edge. I might even cross a street outside of a designated crosswalk area and or drive over the designated speed limit. The bottom line is that I survived and don't stay awake at night worrying about it. I doubt that the terrorists do either. ;-) |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... jamesgangnc wrote: It's a bit futile in my opinion. Both of our land borders with Mexico and Canada are just too large to really stop a determined person from crossing them unobserved. We need another way to deal with the terrorism problem. I noticed this summer while I was in Europe that I still was able to travel quite freely between different countries. I passed through a lot of border points but never had to produce a passport. At one point I was renting an apt about 5 klicks from the swiss italy border and went back and forth between the two countries several times a day. Customs regulations are primarily designed to stop smugglers and illegal immigrants, (ha!), not deter terrorism. In fact, the primary mission of customs is to make sure that all goods coming into the country are taxed. Not according to their website. http://www.customs.gov/ |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JimH wrote: Not according to their website. http://www.customs.gov/ According to tradition. We have had the Customs service since the 1700's. It has only been the last few years when we have felt that it was suddenly important to wrap up all sorts of agencies into a super-organization called Homeland Security. I wouldn't be a bit surprised to discover the mission statement of US Customs has been tweaked a bit in order to keep the "code orange" factor up as high as possible. As a matter of fact, even the USCG started off as an agency to collect taxes and tarrifs. (Revenue cutters). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Dictionary of Paddling Terms :-) | Touring | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Essentials of a Marine Boat Alarm System | Electronics | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General |