OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ChildB...ges/32859.html

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

basskisser wrote:
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ChildB...ges/32859.html

hmmm,

written by Dr. Kevin

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

wrote:
basskisser wrote:
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ChildB...ges/32859.html

hmmm,

written by Dr. Kevin

Cool! wonder what his first name is? Did you actually read it, or did
your problem with reading comprehension bother you too much?

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

basskisser wrote:
wrote:
basskisser wrote:
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ChildB...ges/32859.html

hmmm,

written by Dr. Kevin

Cool! wonder what his first name is?

Evidently his first name is Kevin, and his last name is Kennedy.


Did you actually read it, or did
your problem with reading comprehension bother you too much?

I've read that article over a year ago. I'm concerned about your
reading comprehension, though. did you actually read it yourself? or
did you just post it not knowing who Dr. Kevin Kennedy is?

Evidently you didn't know who Dr. Kevin Kennedy is because you
questioned his "first name"

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

Don't forget Kevin Cronin , lead singer for REO Speedwagon....


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 10 Sep 2006 15:48:32 -0700, wrote:

Evidently you didn't know who Dr. Kevin Kennedy is because you
questioned his "first name"

Well, he's only Six Degrees of Separation from Kevin Bacon.

Just like everybody in the Known Universe is. :)

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

wrote:
basskisser wrote:
wrote:
basskisser wrote:
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ChildB...ges/32859.html

hmmm,

written by Dr. Kevin

Cool! wonder what his first name is?

Evidently his first name is Kevin, and his last name is Kennedy.


Did you actually read it, or did
your problem with reading comprehension bother you too much?

I've read that article over a year ago. I'm concerned about your
reading comprehension, though. did you actually read it yourself? or
did you just post it not knowing who Dr. Kevin Kennedy is?

Evidently you didn't know who Dr. Kevin Kennedy is because you
questioned his "first name"

Uh, I think it's YOUR comprehension, and always has been! Notice, the
common referral of a doctor is Dr. (last name). The appropriate
salutory would be Dr. Kennedy.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

Tell "Dr. Phil" that


basskisser wrote:
wrote:
basskisser wrote:
wrote:
basskisser wrote:
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ChildB...ges/32859.html

hmmm,

written by Dr. Kevin

Cool! wonder what his first name is?

Evidently his first name is Kevin, and his last name is Kennedy.


Did you actually read it, or did
your problem with reading comprehension bother you too much?

I've read that article over a year ago. I'm concerned about your
reading comprehension, though. did you actually read it yourself? or
did you just post it not knowing who Dr. Kevin Kennedy is?

Evidently you didn't know who Dr. Kevin Kennedy is because you
questioned his "first name"

Uh, I think it's YOUR comprehension, and always has been! Notice, the
common referral of a doctor is Dr. (last name). The appropriate
salutory would be Dr. Kennedy.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

basskisser wrote:
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ChildB...ges/32859.html



See if there's any information on the childish behavior site about the
difference between posting something compelling and simply feeling
compelled to post "something".

What the hell does this have to do with boating?


Remnd me when you launched your last on-topic thread. I'll go look it
up for old times' sake.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

YOu mean, something like this, Chuck?



7 From: basskisser - view profile
Date: Mon, Apr 4 2005 7:06 am
Email: "basskisser"
Groups: rec.boats

Date: Mon, Apr 4 2005 7:06 am

John Tavis wrote:
This is a board to discuss boats right? Although there are boat
related threads on this board, there is also a lot of garbage here.
I
really don't see how overweight, bald, middle-aged men's opinions on
the ecomomy, politics, or brain-dead women relate to boating. Maybe
I'm wrong and the name of this board is really just a front so
overweight, bald, middle-aged men can share their opinions on the
ecomomy, politics, and brain-dead women. Please let me know because
I'm looking for intelligent boating opinions.


What does the above diatribe have to do with boats? Kettle, black??










Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ChildB...ges/32859.html



See if there's any information on the childish behavior site about the
difference between posting something compelling and simply feeling
compelled to post "something".

What the hell does this have to do with boating?


Remnd me when you launched your last on-topic thread. I'll go look it
up for old times' sake.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

wrote:
Tell "Dr. Phil" that


basskisser wrote:
wrote:
basskisser wrote:
wrote:
basskisser wrote:
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ChildB...ges/32859.html

hmmm,

written by Dr. Kevin

Cool! wonder what his first name is?

Evidently his first name is Kevin, and his last name is Kennedy.


Did you actually read it, or did
your problem with reading comprehension bother you too much?

I've read that article over a year ago. I'm concerned about your
reading comprehension, though. did you actually read it yourself? or
did you just post it not knowing who Dr. Kevin Kennedy is?

Evidently you didn't know who Dr. Kevin Kennedy is because you
questioned his "first name"

Uh, I think it's YOUR comprehension, and always has been! Notice, the
common referral of a doctor is Dr. (last name). The appropriate
salutory would be Dr. Kennedy.

I'm talking about real people, not talk show hosts.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ChildB...ges/32859.html



See if there's any information on the childish behavior site about the
difference between posting something compelling and simply feeling
compelled to post "something".

What the hell does this have to do with boating?

Nothing, that's why I prefaced the subject with OT.


Remnd me when you launched your last on-topic thread. I'll go look it
up for old times' sake.

Google is a simple and easy to use tool for that.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ChildB...ges/32859.html



See if there's any information on the childish behavior site about the
difference between posting something compelling and simply feeling
compelled to post "something".

What the hell does this have to do with boating?

Nothing, that's why I prefaced the subject with OT.


Remnd me when you launched your last on-topic thread. I'll go look it
up for old times' sake.

Google is a simple and easy to use tool for that.


Google is a great tool, when you get a chance you should read their TOS.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

Chris R wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...
Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ChildB...ges/32859.html


See if there's any information on the childish behavior site about the
difference between posting something compelling and simply feeling
compelled to post "something".

What the hell does this have to do with boating?
Nothing, that's why I prefaced the subject with OT.

Remnd me when you launched your last on-topic thread. I'll go look it
up for old times' sake.
Google is a simple and easy to use tool for that.


Google is a great tool, when you get a chance you should read their TOS.

Oops! I had a hand in getting their TOS updated a few years ago. Do you
remember your involvement in that Harry?

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

Chris R wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ChildB...ges/32859.html



See if there's any information on the childish behavior site about the
difference between posting something compelling and simply feeling
compelled to post "something".

What the hell does this have to do with boating?

Nothing, that's why I prefaced the subject with OT.


Remnd me when you launched your last on-topic thread. I'll go look it
up for old times' sake.

Google is a simple and easy to use tool for that.


Google is a great tool, when you get a chance you should read their TOS.

I have. What's your point?

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

Bert Robbins wrote:
Chris R wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...
Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/ChildB...ges/32859.html


See if there's any information on the childish behavior site about the
difference between posting something compelling and simply feeling
compelled to post "something".

What the hell does this have to do with boating?
Nothing, that's why I prefaced the subject with OT.

Remnd me when you launched your last on-topic thread. I'll go look it
up for old times' sake.
Google is a simple and easy to use tool for that.


Google is a great tool, when you get a chance you should read their TOS.

Oops! I had a hand in getting their TOS updated a few years ago. Do you
remember your involvement in that Harry?

Bert, why do you respond to posts that aren't to you?

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

"basskisser" wrote in message

Google is a great tool, when you get a chance you should read their TOS.

I have. What's your point?

Maybe you missed these?:

6. Appropriate Conduct

You agree that you are responsible for your own conduct and communications
while using the Service and for any consequences thereof. You agree to use
the Service only to send and receive messages and material that are legal,
*PROPER AND RELATED TO THE PARTICULAR GROUP*. By way of example, and not as
a limitation, you agree that when using the Service, you will not:

defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise violate the legal rights
(such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others;

post any inappropriate, defamatory, infringing, obscene, or unlawful
Content;


Here's a couple of others from your ISP's TOS-

Prohibited Uses and Activities
Prohibited uses include, but are not limited to, using the Service, Customer
Equipment, or the Comcast Equipment to:

1.. undertake or accomplish any unlawful purpose. This includes, but is
not limited to, posting, storing, transmitting or disseminating information,
data or material which is libelous, obscene, unlawful, threatening,
defamatory, or which infringes the intellectual property rights of any
person or entity, or which in any way constitutes or encourages conduct that
would constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or
otherwise violate any local, state, federal or international law, order or
regulation;

2.. post, store, send, transmit, or disseminate any information or
material which a reasonable person could deem to be objectionable,
offensive, indecent, pornographic, harassing, threatening, embarrassing,
distressing, vulgar, hateful, racially or ethnically offensive, or otherwise
inappropriate, regardless of whether this material or its dissemination is
unlawful;

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

Chris R wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message

Google is a great tool, when you get a chance you should read their TOS.

I have. What's your point?

Maybe you missed these?:

6. Appropriate Conduct

You agree that you are responsible for your own conduct and communications
while using the Service and for any consequences thereof. You agree to use
the Service only to send and receive messages and material that are legal,
*PROPER AND RELATED TO THE PARTICULAR GROUP*. By way of example, and not as
a limitation, you agree that when using the Service, you will not:

defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise violate the legal rights
(such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others;

Yes, JimH has certainly done a lot of all of the above!

post any inappropriate, defamatory, infringing, obscene, or unlawful
Content;

Yes, JimH has certainly done a lot of all of those, too!


Here's a couple of others from your ISP's TOS-

MY ISP????

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chris R wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message

Google is a great tool, when you get a chance you should read their
TOS.

I have. What's your point?

Maybe you missed these?:

6. Appropriate Conduct

You agree that you are responsible for your own conduct and
communications
while using the Service and for any consequences thereof. You agree to
use
the Service only to send and receive messages and material that are
legal,
*PROPER AND RELATED TO THE PARTICULAR GROUP*. By way of example, and not
as
a limitation, you agree that when using the Service, you will not:

defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise violate the legal
rights
(such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others;

Yes, JimH has certainly done a lot of all of the above!

post any inappropriate, defamatory, infringing, obscene, or unlawful
Content;

Yes, JimH has certainly done a lot of all of those, too!


Here's a couple of others from your ISP's TOS-

MY ISP????


You have once again proven to the entire NG your purpose in posting he
To stir the post, troll and argue with folks. Over the weekend you engaged
in fights with just about every member you posted to and now you bring me
into the mix for absolutely no reason.

I purposely stayed away from your trolls knowing you would eventually hang
yourself with your behavior, once again showing to everyone here what a
worthless NG member you are. I was right.

As Chuck asked you earlier: When was the last time you started an on topic
boating thread Kevin?

Don't bother asking because we know the answer already.

Go away. Please.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

" JimH" not telling you @ pffftt.com wrote in message
. ..

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chris R wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message

Google is a great tool, when you get a chance you should read their
TOS.

I have. What's your point?

Maybe you missed these?:

6. Appropriate Conduct

You agree that you are responsible for your own conduct and
communications
while using the Service and for any consequences thereof. You agree to
use
the Service only to send and receive messages and material that are
legal,
*PROPER AND RELATED TO THE PARTICULAR GROUP*. By way of example, and not
as
a limitation, you agree that when using the Service, you will not:

defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise violate the legal
rights
(such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others;

Yes, JimH has certainly done a lot of all of the above!

post any inappropriate, defamatory, infringing, obscene, or unlawful
Content;

Yes, JimH has certainly done a lot of all of those, too!


Here's a couple of others from your ISP's TOS-

MY ISP????


You have once again proven to the entire NG your purpose in posting he
To stir the *POST*, troll and argue with folks. Over the weekend you
engaged in fights with just about every member you posted to and now you
bring me into the mix for absolutely no reason.

I purposely stayed away from your trolls knowing you would eventually hang
yourself with your behavior, once again showing to everyone here what a
worthless NG member you are. I was right.

As Chuck asked you earlier: When was the last time you started an on
topic boating thread Kevin?

Don't bother asking because we know the answer already.

Go away. Please.


Make that pot, not post.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chris R wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message

Google is a great tool, when you get a chance you should read their
TOS.

I have. What's your point?

Maybe you missed these?:

6. Appropriate Conduct

You agree that you are responsible for your own conduct and
communications
while using the Service and for any consequences thereof. You agree to
use
the Service only to send and receive messages and material that are
legal,
*PROPER AND RELATED TO THE PARTICULAR GROUP*. By way of example, and not
as
a limitation, you agree that when using the Service, you will not:

defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise violate the legal
rights
(such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others;

Yes, JimH has certainly done a lot of all of the above!

post any inappropriate, defamatory, infringing, obscene, or unlawful
Content;

Yes, JimH has certainly done a lot of all of those, too!


Here's a couple of others from your ISP's TOS-

MY ISP????


You have once again proven to the entire NG your purpose in posting he
To stir the post, troll and argue with folks. Over the weekend you engaged
in fights with just about every member you posted to and now you bring me
into the mix for absolutely no reason.

I purposely stayed away from your trolls knowing you would eventually hang
yourself with your behavior, once again showing to everyone here what a
worthless NG member you are. I was right.

As Chuck asked you earlier: When was the last time you started an on topic
boating thread Kevin?

Don't bother asking because we know the answer already.

Asking WHAT????

Go away. Please.

Jim, do you think that telling lies about other people, saying mean and
nasty things about their families, accusing them of beating their wife
and kids, is in any way stirring the pot, or trying to engage someone
in a fight?
I bring you "into the mix" for no reason??? Are you denying that you've
done any of the above? If you were a decent human being you wouldn't
have done those things, therefore you wouldn't be "into the mix".
Furthermore, you are doing nothing but trolling yourself everytime you
call me Kevin, and you know it. Do you need me to look up a sight for
your anger management?

Go away. Please.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

basskisser wrote:


Jim, do you think that telling lies about other people, saying mean and
nasty things about their families, accusing them of beating their wife
and kids, is in any way stirring the pot, or trying to engage someone
in a fight?

There's a general shortage of saints in the NG.

But if we stay in a cycle where we use another poster's previous bad
behavior to justify our own most recent bad behavior, we will make no
progress of any kind.

Assume that any of those things you imply somebody else has done can be
verified with evidence and demonstrated to be true. How has that
behavior shaped your opinion of the person or persons involved? Why
would you imagine for even a moment that descending to the same level
can be done without taking the same general damage to your own
reputation and public image?
The only person you're impressing by persuing this feud is yourself-

There is no excuse for launching threads into the NG that are designed
solely to attack another poster here. No excuse for *anybody* to do
that. (My comments are directed to you in this case because you
launched this thread. Below, you confirm that your purpose in doing so
was to tweak another poster).

Why do I give a Schlitz? Because when the flames of the crap fire get
fanned enough these grammar school bouts of "nonny, nonny, poo, poo"
begin spilling over into the boating related threads here. You or some
adversary will make a comment in the on-topic threads, the other party
will wade in with a personal remark, and then the entire thread goes
straight to hell as a couple of kids spend an entire workday on the
computer exchanging insults, etc etc etc.

Why do you object to being called "Kevin"? I am frequently called much
worse (and recently as well) and somehow life goes on. Name calling
always reflects worse upon the caller of names than the intended victim
so its no big deal. The day you stop rising to the bait is the day your
antagonists will stop using it as often.


basskisser also wrote:

I bring you "into the mix" for no reason??? Are you denying that you've
done any of the above? If you were a decent human being you wouldn't
have done those things, therefore you wouldn't be "into the mix".
Furthermore, you are doing nothing but trolling yourself everytime you
call me Kevin, and you know it. Do you need me to look up a sight for
your anger management?

Go away. Please.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:


Jim, do you think that telling lies about other people, saying mean and
nasty things about their families, accusing them of beating their wife
and kids, is in any way stirring the pot, or trying to engage someone
in a fight?

There's a general shortage of saints in the NG.

But if we stay in a cycle where we use another poster's previous bad
behavior to justify our own most recent bad behavior, we will make no
progress of any kind.

Assume that any of those things you imply somebody else has done can be
verified with evidence and demonstrated to be true. How has that
behavior shaped your opinion of the person or persons involved? Why
would you imagine for even a moment that descending to the same level
can be done without taking the same general damage to your own
reputation and public image?
The only person you're impressing by persuing this feud is yourself-

There is no excuse for launching threads into the NG that are designed
solely to attack another poster here. No excuse for *anybody* to do
that. (My comments are directed to you in this case because you
launched this thread. Below, you confirm that your purpose in doing so
was to tweak another poster).

This thread didn't attack anybody, I simply offered a website that
would help those that need it.

Why do I give a Schlitz? Because when the flames of the crap fire get
fanned enough these grammar school bouts of "nonny, nonny, poo, poo"
begin spilling over into the boating related threads here. You or some
adversary will make a comment in the on-topic threads, the other party
will wade in with a personal remark, and then the entire thread goes
straight to hell as a couple of kids spend an entire workday on the
computer exchanging insults, etc etc etc.

I STILL find it amazing that you and others pig pile on ME, and have
never, ever said a single word about JimH's lies, petty insults, etc.

Why do you object to being called "Kevin"? I am frequently called much
worse (and recently as well) and somehow life goes on. Name calling
always reflects worse upon the caller of names than the intended victim
so its no big deal. The day you stop rising to the bait is the day your
antagonists will stop using it as often.

I don't find it highly offensive, but what you, and I guess most fail
to understand is that JimH uses it as a way to be a little prick
without being obvious. It's part of being bipolar. He can dish it out,
but he sure as hell can't take it.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:


Jim, do you think that telling lies about other people, saying mean and
nasty things about their families, accusing them of beating their wife
and kids, is in any way stirring the pot, or trying to engage someone
in a fight?

There's a general shortage of saints in the NG.

But if we stay in a cycle where we use another poster's previous bad
behavior to justify our own most recent bad behavior, we will make no
progress of any kind.

Assume that any of those things you imply somebody else has done can be
verified with evidence and demonstrated to be true. How has that
behavior shaped your opinion of the person or persons involved? Why
would you imagine for even a moment that descending to the same level
can be done without taking the same general damage to your own
reputation and public image?
The only person you're impressing by persuing this feud is yourself-

There is no excuse for launching threads into the NG that are designed
solely to attack another poster here. No excuse for *anybody* to do
that. (My comments are directed to you in this case because you
launched this thread. Below, you confirm that your purpose in doing so
was to tweak another poster).

This thread didn't attack anybody, I simply offered a website that
would help those that need it.

Why do I give a Schlitz? Because when the flames of the crap fire get
fanned enough these grammar school bouts of "nonny, nonny, poo, poo"
begin spilling over into the boating related threads here. You or some
adversary will make a comment in the on-topic threads, the other party
will wade in with a personal remark, and then the entire thread goes
straight to hell as a couple of kids spend an entire workday on the
computer exchanging insults, etc etc etc.

I STILL find it amazing that you and others pig pile on ME, and have
never, ever said a single word about JimH's lies, petty insults, etc.

Why do you object to being called "Kevin"? I am frequently called much
worse (and recently as well) and somehow life goes on. Name calling
always reflects worse upon the caller of names than the intended victim
so its no big deal. The day you stop rising to the bait is the day your
antagonists will stop using it as often.

I don't find it highly offensive, but what you, and I guess most fail
to understand is that JimH uses it as a way to be a little prick
without being obvious. It's part of being bipolar. He can dish it out,
but he sure as hell can't take it.



Get help psychiatric Kevin. You need it.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

" JimH" not telling you @ pffftt.com wrote in message
. ..

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:


Jim, do you think that telling lies about other people, saying mean
and
nasty things about their families, accusing them of beating their wife
and kids, is in any way stirring the pot, or trying to engage someone
in a fight?

There's a general shortage of saints in the NG.

But if we stay in a cycle where we use another poster's previous bad
behavior to justify our own most recent bad behavior, we will make no
progress of any kind.

Assume that any of those things you imply somebody else has done can be
verified with evidence and demonstrated to be true. How has that
behavior shaped your opinion of the person or persons involved? Why
would you imagine for even a moment that descending to the same level
can be done without taking the same general damage to your own
reputation and public image?
The only person you're impressing by persuing this feud is yourself-

There is no excuse for launching threads into the NG that are designed
solely to attack another poster here. No excuse for *anybody* to do
that. (My comments are directed to you in this case because you
launched this thread. Below, you confirm that your purpose in doing so
was to tweak another poster).

This thread didn't attack anybody, I simply offered a website that
would help those that need it.

Why do I give a Schlitz? Because when the flames of the crap fire get
fanned enough these grammar school bouts of "nonny, nonny, poo, poo"
begin spilling over into the boating related threads here. You or some
adversary will make a comment in the on-topic threads, the other party
will wade in with a personal remark, and then the entire thread goes
straight to hell as a couple of kids spend an entire workday on the
computer exchanging insults, etc etc etc.

I STILL find it amazing that you and others pig pile on ME, and have
never, ever said a single word about JimH's lies, petty insults, etc.

Why do you object to being called "Kevin"? I am frequently called much
worse (and recently as well) and somehow life goes on. Name calling
always reflects worse upon the caller of names than the intended victim
so its no big deal. The day you stop rising to the bait is the day your
antagonists will stop using it as often.

I don't find it highly offensive, but what you, and I guess most fail
to understand is that JimH uses it as a way to be a little prick
without being obvious. It's part of being bipolar. He can dish it out,
but he sure as hell can't take it.



Get psychiatric help Kevin. You need it.

Edit.

Doh, I guess I need grammatical help.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:


Jim, do you think that telling lies about other people, saying mean and
nasty things about their families, accusing them of beating their wife
and kids, is in any way stirring the pot, or trying to engage someone
in a fight?

There's a general shortage of saints in the NG.

But if we stay in a cycle where we use another poster's previous bad
behavior to justify our own most recent bad behavior, we will make no
progress of any kind.

Assume that any of those things you imply somebody else has done can be
verified with evidence and demonstrated to be true. How has that
behavior shaped your opinion of the person or persons involved? Why
would you imagine for even a moment that descending to the same level
can be done without taking the same general damage to your own
reputation and public image?
The only person you're impressing by persuing this feud is yourself-

There is no excuse for launching threads into the NG that are designed
solely to attack another poster here. No excuse for *anybody* to do
that. (My comments are directed to you in this case because you
launched this thread. Below, you confirm that your purpose in doing so
was to tweak another poster).

This thread didn't attack anybody, I simply offered a website that
would help those that need it.

Why do I give a Schlitz? Because when the flames of the crap fire get
fanned enough these grammar school bouts of "nonny, nonny, poo, poo"
begin spilling over into the boating related threads here. You or some
adversary will make a comment in the on-topic threads, the other party
will wade in with a personal remark, and then the entire thread goes
straight to hell as a couple of kids spend an entire workday on the
computer exchanging insults, etc etc etc.

I STILL find it amazing that you and others pig pile on ME, and have
never, ever said a single word about JimH's lies, petty insults, etc.

Why do you object to being called "Kevin"? I am frequently called much
worse (and recently as well) and somehow life goes on. Name calling
always reflects worse upon the caller of names than the intended victim
so its no big deal. The day you stop rising to the bait is the day your
antagonists will stop using it as often.

I don't find it highly offensive, but what you, and I guess most fail
to understand is that JimH uses it as a way to be a little prick
without being obvious. It's part of being bipolar. He can dish it out,
but he sure as hell can't take it.



Get help psychiatric Kevin. You need it.

I'm not Kevin. But, alas, Jim, I've been asking you to get help for
your bipolar condition for some time now.
Why do *I* need help? Because you've told lies here about me, and about
my family? Because you've wrongly accused me of beating my wife and
kids?
Because you continue to try to start fights and perpetuate ongoing
feuds?

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

basskisser wrote:

I'm not Kevin. But, alas, Jim, I've been asking you to get help for
your bipolar condition for some time now.
Why do *I* need help? Because you've told lies here about me, and about
my family? Because you've wrongly accused me of beating my wife and
kids?


Nobody knows who the heck you are.Probably nobody cares. All we know is
who the heck you insist you are not.

How can anybody tell lies about somebody without a name or an identity?
How can anybody tell lies about the *family* of somebody without a name
or an identity? You don't exist except as a figment of your own
imagination because you take great precautions against anybody finding
out who you are. (Lately, I'm beginning to suspect you're a woman- but
don't care enough to really wonder much about it).

Since nobody knows who you are, except you, how can the most vicious
imaginable thing hurt you at all? How can anybody slander a kisser of
bass?


Because you continue to try to start fights and perpetuate ongoing
feuds?


ROTFLAMO

I'm not defending the person or people you claim are persecuting you,
merely condemning your juvenile response as inappropriate for a
newsgroup. Get over it.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:

I'm not Kevin. But, alas, Jim, I've been asking you to get help for
your bipolar condition for some time now.
Why do *I* need help? Because you've told lies here about me, and about
my family? Because you've wrongly accused me of beating my wife and
kids?


Nobody knows who the heck you are.Probably nobody cares. All we know is
who the heck you insist you are not.

How can anybody tell lies about somebody without a name or an identity?
How can anybody tell lies about the *family* of somebody without a name
or an identity? You don't exist except as a figment of your own
imagination because you take great precautions against anybody finding
out who you are. (Lately, I'm beginning to suspect you're a woman- but
don't care enough to really wonder much about it).

Since nobody knows who you are, except you, how can the most vicious
imaginable thing hurt you at all? How can anybody slander a kisser of
bass?


Because you continue to try to start fights and perpetuate ongoing
feuds?


ROTFLAMO

I'm not defending the person or people you claim are persecuting you,
merely condemning your juvenile response as inappropriate for a
newsgroup. Get over it.

You don't think that calling someone petty names, childish insults,
saying things about one's family is petty and juvenile? Read back, I'd
really like to know your thoughts on the trash that JimH has sent my
way. After you read all of his attacks on me, then let me know if you
think THOSE responses aren't juvenile and inappropriate. Again, I find
it absolutely amazing that you condemn anything and everything that I
do, but JimH gets free reign to call anybody any names he chooses, post
off topic posts, spread lies about others, and generally act childish.
Why is that?

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:

I'm not Kevin. But, alas, Jim, I've been asking you to get help for
your bipolar condition for some time now.
Why do *I* need help? Because you've told lies here about me, and about
my family? Because you've wrongly accused me of beating my wife and
kids?


Nobody knows who the heck you are.Probably nobody cares. All we know is
who the heck you insist you are not.

How can anybody tell lies about somebody without a name or an identity?
How can anybody tell lies about the *family* of somebody without a name
or an identity? You don't exist except as a figment of your own
imagination because you take great precautions against anybody finding
out who you are. (Lately, I'm beginning to suspect you're a woman- but
don't care enough to really wonder much about it).

Since nobody knows who you are, except you, how can the most vicious
imaginable thing hurt you at all? How can anybody slander a kisser of
bass?


Because you continue to try to start fights and perpetuate ongoing
feuds?


ROTFLAMO

I'm not defending the person or people you claim are persecuting you,
merely condemning your juvenile response as inappropriate for a
newsgroup. Get over it.

You don't think that calling someone petty names, childish insults,
saying things about one's family is petty and juvenile? Read back, I'd
really like to know your thoughts on the trash that JimH has sent my
way. After you read all of his attacks on me, then let me know if you
think THOSE responses aren't juvenile and inappropriate. Again, I find
it absolutely amazing that you condemn anything and everything that I
do, but JimH gets free reign to call anybody any names he chooses, post
off topic posts, spread lies about others, and generally act childish.
Why is that?


How was your pot crop this year Kevin?

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

Chuck Gould wrote:

Why, because I've got enough balls to stand up for myself???
Or, are you taking on JimH's persona and starting with the childish
insults?

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

basskisser wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

Why, because I've got enough balls to stand up for myself???
Or, are you taking on JimH's persona and starting with the childish
insults?

You may have missed some pertinent comments in post 24.

Just in case, here they are again:

"But if we stay in a cycle where we use another poster's previous bad
behavior to justify our own most recent bad behavior, we will make no
progress of any kind.


Assume that any of those things you imply somebody else has done can be

verified with evidence and demonstrated to be true. How has that
behavior shaped your opinion of the person or persons involved? Why
would you imagine for even a moment that descending to the same level
can be done without taking the same general damage to your own
reputation and public image?
The only person you're impressing by persuing this feud is yourself-"

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...

basskisser wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

Why, because I've got enough balls to stand up for myself???
Or, are you taking on JimH's persona and starting with the childish
insults?

You may have missed some pertinent comments in post 24.

Just in case, here they are again:

"But if we stay in a cycle where we use another poster's previous bad
behavior to justify our own most recent bad behavior, we will make no
progress of any kind.


Assume that any of those things you imply somebody else has done can be

verified with evidence and demonstrated to be true. How has that
behavior shaped your opinion of the person or persons involved? Why
would you imagine for even a moment that descending to the same level
can be done without taking the same general damage to your own
reputation and public image?
The only person you're impressing by persuing this feud is yourself-"


Chuck, drop it. He does not get it and never will. Why try to save him
when all he comes here for is to fight with folks?

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

JimH wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...

basskisser wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

Why, because I've got enough balls to stand up for myself???
Or, are you taking on JimH's persona and starting with the childish
insults?

You may have missed some pertinent comments in post 24.

Just in case, here they are again:

"But if we stay in a cycle where we use another poster's previous bad
behavior to justify our own most recent bad behavior, we will make no
progress of any kind.


Assume that any of those things you imply somebody else has done can be

verified with evidence and demonstrated to be true. How has that
behavior shaped your opinion of the person or persons involved? Why
would you imagine for even a moment that descending to the same level
can be done without taking the same general damage to your own
reputation and public image?
The only person you're impressing by persuing this feud is yourself-"


Chuck, drop it. He does not get it and never will. Why try to save him
when all he comes here for is to fight with folks?

Jim, you tried to save me by telling lies about me? By saying things
about my family? By accusing me of beating my wife and kids? By
accusing me of smoking pot? By accusing me of selling pot? By accusing
me of having a crop of pot?
Just how? By calling Chuck a netcop, and sheriff? By accusing JohnH of
being a homosexual? By calling Eisboch materialistic boy? Just how?

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

Why, because I've got enough balls to stand up for myself???
Or, are you taking on JimH's persona and starting with the childish
insults?

You may have missed some pertinent comments in post 24.

Just in case, here they are again:

"But if we stay in a cycle where we use another poster's previous bad
behavior to justify our own most recent bad behavior, we will make no
progress of any kind.


Assume that any of those things you imply somebody else has done can be

verified with evidence and demonstrated to be true. How has that
behavior shaped your opinion of the person or persons involved? Why
would you imagine for even a moment that descending to the same level
can be done without taking the same general damage to your own
reputation and public image?
The only person you're impressing by persuing this feud is yourself

Again, Chuck GO TO THE SOURCE. That would be JimH. Ask him why he
started this **** and continues to perpetuate it.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 12 Sep 2006 04:50:07 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote:

Jesus man, knock it off - it's getting beyond stupid.

Go fishing or something.

I agree! I DO wish JimH would knock it off! I hope he heeds your
request.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

Why, because I've got enough balls to stand up for myself???
Or, are you taking on JimH's persona and starting with the childish
insults?

You may have missed some pertinent comments in post 24.

Just in case, here they are again:

"But if we stay in a cycle where we use another poster's previous bad
behavior to justify our own most recent bad behavior, we will make no
progress of any kind.


Assume that any of those things you imply somebody else has done can be

verified with evidence and demonstrated to be true. How has that
behavior shaped your opinion of the person or persons involved? Why
would you imagine for even a moment that descending to the same level
can be done without taking the same general damage to your own
reputation and public image?
The only person you're impressing by persuing this feud is yourself

Again, Chuck GO TO THE SOURCE. That would be JimH. Ask him why he
started this **** and continues to perpetuate it.

And who started this thread?

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

"ACP" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

Why, because I've got enough balls to stand up for myself???
Or, are you taking on JimH's persona and starting with the childish
insults?

You may have missed some pertinent comments in post 24.

Just in case, here they are again:

"But if we stay in a cycle where we use another poster's previous bad
behavior to justify our own most recent bad behavior, we will make no
progress of any kind.


Assume that any of those things you imply somebody else has done can be

verified with evidence and demonstrated to be true. How has that
behavior shaped your opinion of the person or persons involved? Why
would you imagine for even a moment that descending to the same level
can be done without taking the same general damage to your own
reputation and public image?
The only person you're impressing by persuing this feud is yourself

Again, Chuck GO TO THE SOURCE. That would be JimH. Ask him why he
started this **** and continues to perpetuate it.

And who started this thread?


Actually Kevin started a total 6 threads on Sunday and Monday, all directed
towards me and obvious attempts to start a fight with me.

And he blames me for starting and perpetuating it.

Unbelievable.

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 12 Sep 2006 04:50:07 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote:

Jesus man, knock it off - it's getting beyond stupid.

Go fishing or something.

I agree! I DO wish JimH would knock it off! I hope he heeds your
request.


Hey Kevin, it was *you* who started 6 threads directed at me this past
Sunday and Monday in an attempt to pick a fight. And I need to knock it
off? Amazing!

Tom is the 5th person asking you to stop it already. When will you?

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

ACP wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

Why, because I've got enough balls to stand up for myself???
Or, are you taking on JimH's persona and starting with the childish
insults?

You may have missed some pertinent comments in post 24.

Just in case, here they are again:

"But if we stay in a cycle where we use another poster's previous bad
behavior to justify our own most recent bad behavior, we will make no
progress of any kind.


Assume that any of those things you imply somebody else has done can be

verified with evidence and demonstrated to be true. How has that
behavior shaped your opinion of the person or persons involved? Why
would you imagine for even a moment that descending to the same level
can be done without taking the same general damage to your own
reputation and public image?
The only person you're impressing by persuing this feud is yourself

Again, Chuck GO TO THE SOURCE. That would be JimH. Ask him why he
started this **** and continues to perpetuate it.

And who started this thread?

I did. I thought it would be a great help for those who are trying to
quit lying. Did you find the website informative?

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

JimH wrote:
"ACP" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

Why, because I've got enough balls to stand up for myself???
Or, are you taking on JimH's persona and starting with the childish
insults?

You may have missed some pertinent comments in post 24.

Just in case, here they are again:

"But if we stay in a cycle where we use another poster's previous bad
behavior to justify our own most recent bad behavior, we will make no
progress of any kind.


Assume that any of those things you imply somebody else has done can be

verified with evidence and demonstrated to be true. How has that
behavior shaped your opinion of the person or persons involved? Why
would you imagine for even a moment that descending to the same level
can be done without taking the same general damage to your own
reputation and public image?
The only person you're impressing by persuing this feud is yourself

Again, Chuck GO TO THE SOURCE. That would be JimH. Ask him why he
started this **** and continues to perpetuate it.

And who started this thread?


Actually Kevin started a total 6 threads on Sunday and Monday, all directed
towards me and obvious attempts to start a fight with me.

And he blames me for starting and perpetuating it.

Unbelievable.

What is unbelievable is that I can't find one single thread that Kevin
started. Could you point me to them, Bipolar Boy?

OT Beginner's guide to quitting lying.
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

ACP wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

Why, because I've got enough balls to stand up for myself???
Or, are you taking on JimH's persona and starting with the childish
insults?

You may have missed some pertinent comments in post 24.

Just in case, here they are again:

"But if we stay in a cycle where we use another poster's previous bad
behavior to justify our own most recent bad behavior, we will make no
progress of any kind.


Assume that any of those things you imply somebody else has done can
be

verified with evidence and demonstrated to be true. How has that
behavior shaped your opinion of the person or persons involved? Why
would you imagine for even a moment that descending to the same level
can be done without taking the same general damage to your own
reputation and public image?
The only person you're impressing by persuing this feud is yourself

Again, Chuck GO TO THE SOURCE. That would be JimH. Ask him why he
started this **** and continues to perpetuate it.

And who started this thread?

I did. I thought it would be a great help for those who are trying to
quit lying. Did you find the website informative?

The only thing I found about the first post in this thread is that a Troll
was doing his thing. I don't lie as I found out long, long ago it's too
hard to remember the details if questioned about it at a later date.