DSK wrote:

Why do you Bush-Cheney Cheerleaders always refer to
statements of simple fact as "personal attacks"?
DSK

May I ask, what's that line got to do with anything in this thread?

Why do you Bush-Cheney Cheerleaders always refer to
statements of simple fact as "personal attacks"?


wrote:
May I ask, what's that line got to do with anything in this thread?


It refers to JimH's political leanings and his whining that
I was attacking him personally, when all I did was point out
the obvious.

Perhaps I should be more charitable, your explanation that
Clapton could be an utter prince of a guy and still have a
bad attitude for one night, is perfectly credible.

DSK

DSK wrote:
Why do you Bush-Cheney Cheerleaders always refer to
statements of simple fact as "personal attacks"?


wrote:
May I ask, what's that line got to do with anything in this thread?


It refers to JimH's political leanings.........


Ah, thanks for explaining your reason for turning to personal attacks.

So it is all about politics with you. My, my.

JimH wrote:
So it is all about politics with you. My, my.


Oh yes, in fact I get criticised all the time for starting
so many off-topic threads and trying to instigate flame wars
against those who disagree with my politics.

DSK

DSK wrote:
Why do you Bush-Cheney Cheerleaders always refer to
statements of simple fact as "personal attacks"?


May I ask, what's that line got to do with anything in this thread?

It refers to JimH's political leanings.........

Ah, thanks for explaining your reason for turning to personal attacks.
So it is all about politics with you. My, my.



Oh yes, in fact I get criticised all the time for starting
so many off-topic threads and trying to instigate flame wars
against those who disagree with my politics.

DSK

If the shoe fits............... ;-)