![]() |
Damn - this is amazing...
Chuck Gould wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote: Aha, I just figured out a way to tell whether the Cleveland show was any briefer than others at the time.... I'll be back. :-) Looks like he also played a 12-song set in Saginaw on June 5th. http://www.geetarz.org/reviews/clapt...05-saginaw.htm Clapton very rarely smiles, so maybe it looked like he was upset. ;) |
Damn - this is amazing...
Chuck Gould wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: Aha, I just figured out a way to tell whether the Cleveland show was any briefer than others at the time.... I'll be back. :-) Looks like he also played a 12-song set in Saginaw on June 5th. http://www.geetarz.org/reviews/clapt...05-saginaw.htm But the folks in Augusta, Georgia a week earlier did get a 15-song performance: http://www.geetarz.org/reviews/clapt...25-augusta.htm Ten days to play Augusta, Cleveland, and Saginaw? Those must have been some lean times indeed for E.C. |
Damn - this is amazing...
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: Don't know. But they did walk off before a full concert. Check the attendance at that show Chuck and you will find it was far less than 1/2 capacity (the Coliseum was the Cleveland Cavaliers basketball arena). Once my curiosity is aroused, I can be as relentless as a terrier with a chew toy. Bad personal trait, I know. Turns out there was more than one recording made that night. The first CD I already referenced and this one: http://www.geetarz.org/reviews/clapt...r-required.htm "No Longer Required" is a double album, but there are only 6-8 songs per disc. So, was the show longer than you remember and these numbers included long solos and a lot of jamming, or did Clapton flee the scene after just a 12-song set? The reviewer's notes of the concert said that the most unusual thing to occur was Eric Clapton dedicating a song to bandmate Albert Lee in honor of Lee's impending marriage, but if they edited out the part where Clapton said, "To hell with Cleveland! If you can't completely fill the house like my normally rabid fans everywhere else we're just outa here......", and if the reviewer was writing from the recording and not present at the show then the reviewer missed all the fireworks. Aha, I just figured out a way to tell whether the Cleveland show was any briefer than others at the time.... I'll be back. :-) Interesting stuff Chuck....thanks. I was there and remember them leaving the stage in a huff. I apparently was wrong about half a show, but I guess we expected more than 45 minutes and certainly an encore performance that never happened. But that was 27 years ago. ;-) |
Damn - this is amazing...
JimH wrote: Interesting stuff Chuck....thanks. I was there and remember them leaving the stage in a huff. I apparently was wrong about half a show, but I guess we expected more than 45 minutes and certainly an encore performance that never happened. But that was 27 years ago. ;-) No encore is a more acceptable way to express dissatisfaction with the acoustics, the crowd, the promoter, your bandmates, lack of proper refreshment and awestruck female companionship in the dressing area, etc than walking off in the middle of a performance. Also a lot smarter- there's a 100% chance that the booking contract defined the minimum acceptable performance time. No play, no pay. If there was a problem, it may well have been with the promoter being a bit stingy, or a weak gate that meant the band would be playing for "just" the minimum guarantee- and if that were the case the "minimum" performance would be all you would likely get. Besides, they proably had to rush off without an encore to make connections. They only had 3 days to get to Saginaw. :-) I mean, Cleveland, after all. What did EC expect? Weren't both of his Ohio fans there? ((just kidding!!)) He couldn't have fouled the nest too badly, as he has appeared at the same venue several times since. Do you remember who opened for Eric Clapton on that tour? |
Damn - this is amazing...
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: Interesting stuff Chuck....thanks. I was there and remember them leaving the stage in a huff. I apparently was wrong about half a show, but I guess we expected more than 45 minutes and certainly an encore performance that never happened. But that was 27 years ago. ;-) No encore is a more acceptable way to express dissatisfaction with the acoustics, the crowd, the promoter, your bandmates, lack of proper refreshment and awestruck female companionship in the dressing area, etc than walking off in the middle of a performance. Also a lot smarter- there's a 100% chance that the booking contract defined the minimum acceptable performance time. No play, no pay. If there was a problem, it may well have been with the promoter being a bit stingy, or a weak gate that meant the band would be playing for "just" the minimum guarantee- and if that were the case the "minimum" performance would be all you would likely get. Besides, they proably had to rush off without an encore to make connections. They only had 3 days to get to Saginaw. :-) I mean, Cleveland, after all. What did EC expect? Weren't both of his Ohio fans there? ((just kidding!!)) The home of Rock and Roll! He couldn't have fouled the nest too badly, as he has appeared at the same venue several times since. Do you remember who opened for Eric Clapton on that tour? No. |
Damn - this is amazing...
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
... On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:18:11 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. Then, there's this guy: http://www.toddwolfe.com/ Check his schedule. Go see him. Amazing. Pah - another Clapton wannabe. Dime a dozen. You've seen him? I've heard him - that's enough. With Sheryl Crow? |
Damn - this is amazing...
"basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:41:02 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. The technique relies on muscle memory, but I've never quite seen anybody do it with just plain old freakin' skill... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5Sl8sZuT-U Hopefully, he will eventually learn how to play music. This kind of technical gimmickry quickly grows boring. You're not supposed to watch it for hours and hours! John If you add up all the others just like him from the past, the minutes you've listened add up quickly to hours. Then, there's this guy: http://www.toddwolfe.com/ Check his schedule. Go see him. Amazing. And, of course...... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI5CC...elated&search= http://www.robbenford.com/ Pass the barf bag! My guitarist thinks Robben Ford is a god. He dresses like him, and owns a Baker guitar, which can't cut it on stage. All this to emulate a guy who was goofy enough to think he could cover a song like "Peace Love & Understanding", and ended up castrating it instead. Same with his version of Homework, which can't hold a candle to the J. Geils version. I'm starting to get it now. You don't like any guitarist who's innovative. I love to see a good guitarist take someone else's song and make it their own, as opposed to playing at the Ramada Inn covering pop songs. Being innovative is one thing. Knowing when you're taking a cover song down 12 notches is an entirely different skill. "Peace Love & Understanding" is a fiery, passionate song. I'm sure you don't actually think Ford retained that in his version. If he chose to take that away, then why? Would you like to hear Harry Connick Jr. do a sappy orchestral version of Led Zeppelin's "Whole Lotta Love"? :-) Hang on...maybe we're onto something. You know how, mainly in summer, symphony orchestras like to do pops concerts, where they rape Beatles songs? All I know is that when our guitarist suggested we do PL&U Ford's way, everyone else in the band asked "Why? It's....nothing." Even great songwriters know when to leave things alone. In an interview I heard a few years ago, John Prine said that when he does one of his rare live performances, he almost never sings any song he's written for Bonnie Raitt. Why? Because he knows he's a great songwriter, but a 3rd rate performer. There's no point in phuquing up a song that's been done beautifully by someone else. |
Damn - this is amazing...
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
... On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:03:32 -0400, DSK wrote: Clapton is rather modest and very dedicated to his profession. He plays guitar (when asked to by the music director) in church, for gosh sake. I don't know how true this is, but back in the day, I knew a studio engineer who did some mixing on one of the Cream albums. Apparently, according to his story anyway, the only one in the session on altitude restriction was Clapton - stone cold sober. He also told me the story of Baker being so stoned he couldn't stand up, but when they put him in front of his drums, he played it straight through, then fell off the stool unconscious. :) What ever happened to Jack Bruce anyway? Cream did a reunion concert last year (IIRC) at Royal Albert Hall. Before that, Bruce was involved in some local jazz projects. Jazz is where he got his start before Cream, playing acoustic & electric with people like John McLaughlin. |
Damn - this is amazing...
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:08:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:18:11 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message m... Then, there's this guy: http://www.toddwolfe.com/ Check his schedule. Go see him. Amazing. Pah - another Clapton wannabe. Dime a dozen. You've seen him? I've heard him - that's enough. With Sheryl Crow? No - I was given one of his live albums - from a gig he did somewhere. I was not impressed - like I said, Clapton wannabe. I gave the album away I think - it's not in my data base. "Live at Manny's Car Wash". You should've hung onto it just for Paul Unsworth's drumming on 3 of the songs. Absolutely amazing. |
Damn - this is amazing...
"basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... The technique relies on muscle memory, but I've never quite seen anybody do it with just plain old freakin' skill... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5Sl8sZuT-U Hopefully, he will eventually learn how to play music. This kind of technical gimmickry quickly grows boring. You have to first have the technical skills down if you are ever going to be an excellent guitar player. Hell, my first teacher didn't care much about your picking hand. My second teacher cared a LOT about it, and my playing skills went up considerably. I guess I see it differently. You come up with ideas, and then you "learn into" those ideas. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com