Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
RG RG is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 438
Default OK, Lets try this again.



I am just wondering why a 5 year old boat with less than 130 hours on it
needed a new engine.


I can think of one reason, based solely on personal experience. Cracked
block due to winter freeze. Been there.


  #12   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,091
Default OK, Lets try this again.


"RG" wrote in message
m...


I am just wondering why a 5 year old boat with less than 130 hours on it
needed a new engine.


I can think of one reason, based solely on personal experience. Cracked
block due to winter freeze. Been there.


That's what I was thinking.

Eisboch


  #13   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 7
Default OK, Lets try this again.


New engine under 40 hours


Pin hole in manifold...blah blah blah
end result, blown number 1 cylinder

bad news was he only had the boat 5 hours when it happened.

  #14   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,091
Default OK, Lets try this again.


"Brazilla" wrote in message
ups.com...

New engine under 40 hours


Pin hole in manifold...blah blah blah
end result, blown number 1 cylinder

bad news was he only had the boat 5 hours when it happened.



Not to be anal about this, but how did the boat have 130 hours on it if the
original engine croaked after 5 hours?


Eisboch


  #15   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 7
Default OK, Lets try this again.


Eisboch wrote:
"Brazilla" wrote in message
ups.com...

New engine under 40 hours


Pin hole in manifold...blah blah blah
end result, blown number 1 cylinder

bad news was HE only had the boat 5 hours when it happened.



Not to be anal about this, but how did the boat have 130 hours on it if the
original engine croaked after 5 hours?


Eisboch


second owner. Boat had 80 something hrs on when he bought it.

Point is....How's the Boat (power train), underpowered? does it plane
well? Any known problems with the boat? Does the arch blow off at 30
knots?
Any history here that me being a noob here would not be aware of? Yes,
we'll use the boat on freshwater for evenings and weekend pleasure.



  #16   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
RG RG is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 438
Default OK, Lets try this again.


"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"RG" wrote in message
m...


I am just wondering why a 5 year old boat with less than 130 hours on it
needed a new engine.


I can think of one reason, based solely on personal experience. Cracked
block due to winter freeze. Been there.


That's what I was thinking.


In my case, the boat was only four years old and in excellent condition, and
warranted a proper repair. I called a number of shops in town to ask how
they would handle the repair. I got a lot of stupid answers like "we'll
just go down to the junkyard and pull a 350 out of a wrecked pickup truck".
I finally came across a shop that told me he would only do the job one way,
and that was to order a new crated 350 long block direct from MerCruiser, an
identical replacement. The only thing used from the old engine would be
externals, such as carb, alternator, water pump, fuel pump, distributor,
etc. I towed the boat to his shop the next day. Had it back in two weeks,
and it ran exactly the same as it did before the incident, which is to say,
perfect. That was six thousand 1992 insurance company (thankfully) dollars.
Turned out to be a very strong selling point when I sold the boat 6 months
later, since I was able to produce the repair invoice to potential buyers.


  #17   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 21
Default OK, Lets try this again.


" JimH" not telling you @ pffftt.com wrote in message
...

" JimH" not telling you @ pffftt.com wrote in message
. ..

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:16:56 -0400, " JimH" not telling you @
pffftt.com wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
m...
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:50:41 -0400, " JimH" not telling you @
pffftt.com wrote:


"Eisboch" wrote in message
news:xKSdnZrL9PAKlHzZnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@gigane ws.com...

"Brazilla" wrote in message
ps.com...
First of all I'd like to say Hi and I'm happy to have found these
boards.

I've been looking at Boats for about 6 months and have settled on a
power cruiser, used to avoid the hicky and beacuse it'll be my
first
real boat. This boat seems to meet my needs and would love to hear
from
some experienced people for their comments.

2001 WELLCRAFT MARTINIQUE 2600

Volvo GS 5.7 Volvo Duo Prop W/ UNDER 130 HOURS on boat and less
than 40
hours on new engine with warranty till Dec. 06...FRESH WATER ONLY.

Has all the goodies included and is a clean boat.

Thanks for your coments.




I have had a 2000 3000 martinique we bought in spring that we just love.
the twin 5.7 run great with 450 hrs. the new motor would not bother me it
would be every thing else if the motor blew or was not winterised right it
could be a sighn of how responsable the owners arn't and you may want to
have it inspected and the wellcraft is a heavy boat compaired to equil
sized boats which is why we bought it



  #18   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default OK, Lets try this again.

On 14 Aug 2006 18:09:15 -0700, "Brazilla"
wrote:

How's the Boat (power train), underpowered?


A little underpowered in my opinion for a heavy 26 footer. I have sea
trialed SeaRay 26s with the same engine and they are underpowered. We
presently have a heavy 24 with the same engine, older version. It
cruises at 23 to 24 kts which is adequate but no speed demon.

  #19   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 879
Default OK, Lets try this again.


JimH wrote:
OMG! I forgot to tell you that he even thinks the newer Bayliners
are.....................(are you sitting down?)..........a good value for
their intended purpose..........near shore, inland lake or freshwater!



Why do you think they're named "bay-liners"?

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017