Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:10:02 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 08:28:44 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Breaker ..... Breaker..... How 'bout it Chuckster ..... Got yer ears on good buddy ??? Breaker ..... Breaker ..." Breaker Breaker Eisboch... Got two Smokey's hangin' a 10-35 working a 10-36 eastbound at the 174 and a 10-50 at the 152 westbound. 10-4? Good copy, good buddy. Just came back from a long ride over to Carver in the General Lee. The new engine is really running good. Came back via the new section of Rt. 44 and out of the blue I got a state trooper coming up behind me, lights flashing and gaining fast. I wasn't speeding, so I figured he must have had a problem with the glass pacs. He pulled up beside me, gave a big grin, thumbs up and took off. I really wish they wouldn't do that. 10-99 10-4. How much do you want to bet the car is on the cop's DVD or tape and when he get's back to the station, you are going to be the star? Yep. ;-) And I can understand how frustrating that can be for him when all he wants is a nice relaxing ride in the car. Who needs that sort of BS scare? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() " JimH" not telling you @ pffftt.com wrote in message . .. "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:10:02 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 08:28:44 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Breaker ..... Breaker..... How 'bout it Chuckster ..... Got yer ears on good buddy ??? Breaker ..... Breaker ..." Breaker Breaker Eisboch... Got two Smokey's hangin' a 10-35 working a 10-36 eastbound at the 174 and a 10-50 at the 152 westbound. 10-4? Good copy, good buddy. Just came back from a long ride over to Carver in the General Lee. The new engine is really running good. Came back via the new section of Rt. 44 and out of the blue I got a state trooper coming up behind me, lights flashing and gaining fast. I wasn't speeding, so I figured he must have had a problem with the glass pacs. He pulled up beside me, gave a big grin, thumbs up and took off. I really wish they wouldn't do that. 10-99 10-4. How much do you want to bet the car is on the cop's DVD or tape and when he get's back to the station, you are going to be the star? Yep. ;-) And I can understand how frustrating that can be for him when all he wants is a nice relaxing ride in the car. Who needs that sort of BS scare? It really wasn't a scare. It happened so fast I really didn't know what to think, so I assumed he had some problem with the exhaust sound (it *is* a bit loud) or maybe there was something wrong with the car. I don't drive crazy in the old cars ... so if they are after me it's for another reason. The M5 is a different story. That son of a gun is going to cost me my license someday. Ya just can't help it. Eisboch |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eisboch" wrote in message ... " JimH" not telling you @ pffftt.com wrote in message . .. The M5 is a different story. That son of a gun is going to cost me my license someday. Ya just can't help it. Eisboch Yep. And that is the reason I will not buy a muscle car of any type. ;-) I drove my brother in laws 1995 5L Mustang a year after he bought it and came to that conclusion then. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() " JimH" not telling you @ pffftt.com wrote in message . .. "Eisboch" wrote in message ... " JimH" not telling you @ pffftt.com wrote in message . .. The M5 is a different story. That son of a gun is going to cost me my license someday. Ya just can't help it. Eisboch Yep. And that is the reason I will not buy a muscle car of any type. ;-) I drove my brother in laws 1995 5L Mustang a year after he bought it and came to that conclusion then. A Mustang? Geeze. Even the old '46 Ford eats 5L Mustangs for lunch. Eisboch |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eisboch" wrote in message ... " JimH" not telling you @ pffftt.com wrote in message . .. "Eisboch" wrote in message ... " JimH" not telling you @ pffftt.com wrote in message . .. The M5 is a different story. That son of a gun is going to cost me my license someday. Ya just can't help it. Eisboch Yep. And that is the reason I will not buy a muscle car of any type. ;-) I drove my brother in laws 1995 5L Mustang a year after he bought it and came to that conclusion then. A Mustang? Geeze. Even the old '46 Ford eats 5L Mustangs for lunch. Eisboch Yeah, yeah. But that was enough power to teach me to stay away from cars with powerful engines....................for my families sake. ;-) |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yep. And that is the reason I will not buy a muscle car of any type. ;-) Funny that you say that. The true "muscle car" era was very short-lived. It's origins was in the early 60's with limited availability to the consumer - manufacturers had to build a minimum number of car models and engines (427 Ford, 426 hemi Chrysler) engines a year to qualify as "stock" for NASCAR racing purposes. The 1964 Pontiac Tempest GTO is considered by many to be the first mass produced "muscle car". (It's an interesting story how how John DeLoreon managed sneak that one by the Board of Directors at Pontiac). But, by the end of the 60's the fed had started imposing emission requirements that lowered compression ratios and horsepower. By 1972 there was no longer a true stock "muscle car". Now, within the past 5 years or so and due to advancements in engineering and engine design, there are some current model cars that can outperform their 1960 something counterparts. For example, the new Dodge Charger R/T with the mini-hemi is faster than a '69 Charger R/T with the high output 440. Not by much ... but it's faster and handles much better. Same is true of the limited production version of the new GTO. So .... you may be driving a muscle car and not even realize it. Eisboch |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eisboch" wrote in message ... Yep. And that is the reason I will not buy a muscle car of any type. ;-) Funny that you say that. The true "muscle car" era was very short-lived. It's origins was in the early 60's with limited availability to the consumer - manufacturers had to build a minimum number of car models and engines (427 Ford, 426 hemi Chrysler) engines a year to qualify as "stock" for NASCAR racing purposes. The 1964 Pontiac Tempest GTO is considered by many to be the first mass produced "muscle car". (It's an interesting story how how John DeLoreon managed sneak that one by the Board of Directors at Pontiac). But, by the end of the 60's the fed had started imposing emission requirements that lowered compression ratios and horsepower. By 1972 there was no longer a true stock "muscle car". Now, within the past 5 years or so and due to advancements in engineering and engine design, there are some current model cars that can outperform their 1960 something counterparts. For example, the new Dodge Charger R/T with the mini-hemi is faster than a '69 Charger R/T with the high output 440. Not by much ... but it's faster and handles much better. Same is true of the limited production version of the new GTO. So .... you may be driving a muscle car and not even realize it. Eisboch I can burn rubber with my 6 cylinder 2005 Mercury Sable. ;-) |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JimH wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:10:02 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 08:28:44 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Breaker ..... Breaker..... How 'bout it Chuckster ..... Got yer ears on good buddy ??? Breaker ..... Breaker ..." Breaker Breaker Eisboch... Got two Smokey's hangin' a 10-35 working a 10-36 eastbound at the 174 and a 10-50 at the 152 westbound. 10-4? Good copy, good buddy. Just came back from a long ride over to Carver in the General Lee. The new engine is really running good. Came back via the new section of Rt. 44 and out of the blue I got a state trooper coming up behind me, lights flashing and gaining fast. I wasn't speeding, so I figured he must have had a problem with the glass pacs. He pulled up beside me, gave a big grin, thumbs up and took off. I really wish they wouldn't do that. 10-99 10-4. How much do you want to bet the car is on the cop's DVD or tape and when he get's back to the station, you are going to be the star? Yep. ;-) And I can understand how frustrating that can be for him when all he wants is a nice relaxing ride in the car. Who needs that sort of BS scare? Jim, what happened to you calling him all kinds of childish names and petty insults because he has things you don't? |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... Jim, what happened to you calling him all kinds of childish names and petty insults because he has things you don't? Why don't you just shut up? This is getting old and I, for one, am getting tired of it. Eisboch (getting very tempted to use the killfile for the first time, ever) |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eisboch" wrote in message Why don't you just shut up? This is getting old and I, for one, am getting tired of it. Eisboch (getting very tempted to use the killfile for the first time, ever) Don't you understand that these BS posts are the reason they are here? They are people without a life, and this NG serves as a surrogate. If you are posting here dozens of time per day, how much real life can you have? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ding Dong: Chuck Gould | General | |||
OT Ping Chuck Gould | General | |||
Ping: Chuck Gould | General | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General |