| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 20:03:09 -0400, DSK wrote:
IMHO he is as honest & conscientious a Senator as is likely to be found on either side. *But* let me ask a few leading questions... why does the Republican publicity machine suddenly want to dabble in a Democrat election? I can think of several reasons- by having a lot of blatant Bush-Cheney Cheerleaders supporting Lieberman, he is more likely to lose, thereby removing a senior Democratic Senator with a lot of influence over where the money goes; also putting in place a more vulnerable Democrat. Did it not seem odd to anybody else that the rightwingnuts are suddenly so hot about Lieberman, when just a few short years ago they were screaming about what a commie-liberal-fag-traitor he was (almost as bad as shudder Al Gore). I can think of another very good reason Republicans are interested, fear. The main issue that brought Lieberman's defeat, was his support for the war in Iraq. That makes a lot of Republicans, and Democrats, worried. It's too early to say, how a Democrats defeat, in a relatively liberal state, will translate to a national election in November, but I would say, many do have reason to worry. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"thunder" wrote in message ... I can think of another very good reason Republicans are interested, fear. The main issue that brought Lieberman's defeat, was his support for the war in Iraq. That makes a lot of Republicans, and Democrats, worried. It's too early to say, how a Democrats defeat, in a relatively liberal state, will translate to a national election in November, but I would say, many do have reason to worry. There may be an unexpected backlash in the national elections that does not favor Democratic candidates. Democrats everywhere will be taking notice of what happened to Joe Lieberman and collectively will be moving their respective positions more to the left, further narrowing voter options. Republican candidates will then have room to move more to a center "moderate" position and may end up having more appeal nationwide. Betcha Hillary starts moving left soon. This is going to be interesting. Eisboch |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 06:41:50 -0400, Eisboch wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message ... I can think of another very good reason Republicans are interested, fear. The main issue that brought Lieberman's defeat, was his support for the war in Iraq. That makes a lot of Republicans, and Democrats, worried. It's too early to say, how a Democrats defeat, in a relatively liberal state, will translate to a national election in November, but I would say, many do have reason to worry. There may be an unexpected backlash in the national elections that does not favor Democratic candidates. Democrats everywhere will be taking notice of what happened to Joe Lieberman and collectively will be moving their respective positions more to the left, further narrowing voter options. Republican candidates will then have room to move more to a center "moderate" position and may end up having more appeal nationwide. Betcha Hillary starts moving left soon. This is going to be interesting. While my politics differed with Lieberman, he did have my respect. You knew where he stood. He was unlike the gutless wonders you describe above. Those willing to take any side of any issue to get elected, then sliding back once they are entrenched. It will be interesting, but I don't think much will change, regardless of which party wins. Unfortunately, to me, both parties are much the same. With 300 million people, I keep thinking we should be able to find better leadership. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Cannibalism on the Hard | ASA | |||