Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:


JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Alotta Fagina" wrote in message
...
You wrote:

"Alotta Fagina" wrote in message
...
You wrote:

If you look at figure 2 in the following link, you'll note that
it's the consumption side of the equation, not the production
side, that is causing most of our dependence on foreign oil.

The libfags' favorite country, France, gets 70% of its electricity
from nuclear. Know when the US built its last nuclear reactor?
The 1970s. Why? Because of whining from you libfags.

This is YOUR fault and there is NO way to deny it.

Moron. Your comments have nothing to do with the article in the
message you responded to.

The morons are the folks at the NRDC.

Hey! Thanks for reminding me - their literature was hidden in my mail
pile. I just stuck a check for $100 in an envelope.

Thanks for reminding me, also, I just donated via there website!

Since you don't know how to spell "their" I assume your check will be NSF.

Hmmm, can't comprehend what's written huh? IF you could actually read,
you'd see where I said I donated on the website. What do you think I
did, stuff a check through the internet somehow? People that actually
use their brains have this magical card, commonly called a *credit
card*.

Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

Hehe, you call me ****ing stupid, and you can't even realize that you
are talking apples and oranges. ANWR doesn't have a damned thing to do
with what is happening today.

Closed pipeline = supply problem
ANWR = supply solution

It's not that they don't have a damned thing to do with eachother, it's
that you have no interest in pursuing solutions.

Look back, how much
did the price per gallon at the pump go down when Prudoe Bay came
online?

That's Prudhoe, dumb****.

Your childish name calling proves that you have NOTHING but what you
feel. Please show any and all hard data that you have that suggests
that by opening ANWR, thus supplying around 1 or 2 percent of our
energy demands will have an affect on the prices. Really, all you have
to do is show the data instead of the childish name calling and petty
insults, and then someone may actually take you as serious.

Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

Hehe, you call me ****ing stupid, and you can't even realize that you
are talking apples and oranges. ANWR doesn't have a damned thing to do
with what is happening today.

Closed pipeline = supply problem
ANWR = supply solution

It's not that they don't have a damned thing to do with eachother, it's
that you have no interest in pursuing solutions.

Look back, how much
did the price per gallon at the pump go down when Prudoe Bay came
online?

That's Prudhoe, dumb****.

By the way, since you like to childishly show people's syntax errors,
there's no such word as dumb****. It would be dumb ****, two words. Why
would Prudoe be any different from ANWR? Same geology, same basic area,
same weather same issues.

On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 19:03:04 GMT, Alotta Fagina wrote:

You wrote:

I don't know why we as a nation allow the energy providers to operate in
the unsupervised fashion they enjoy and use against us. It's not as if
they have ever been honest or trustworthy.

Yeah, we need honest and trustworthy people like Duke Cunningham and Bill
Clinton running the energy companies.

What we need is for you to take jps, bk, and anyone else who'll argue
politics with you over to 'a.politics' and have a regular ****in' contest!
--
******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

John

Harry Krause wrote:
Alotta Fagina wrote:



Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.



You seem to be in contention for official newsgroup horse's ass...congrats.

But we all know your won't be relinquishing it...congrats.

-- Charlie

Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:


Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

Please show any and all hard data that you have that suggests
that by opening ANWR, thus supplying around 1 or 2 percent of our
energy demands will have an affect on the prices.

Freshman economics class. Too bad you were smoking dope at the time (or
more likely, weren't even accepted to college).

Again, I can simply prove your ignorance. Please show what evidence you
have that I have ever smoked "dope".
Again, I'll ask you, please show any and all hard data that you have
that suggests that by opening ANWR, that price at the pump will go down.

If you don't understand supply and demand, there's no hope for you.

I fully understand supply and demand, much more so than you understand
the English language. I asked for, and have yet to receive from you,
any hard data that would suggest that drilling in ANWR will result in
lower prices at the pump. You've made that allegation, so back it up.
You've also made the allegation that I was "smoking dope". I'm also
waiting for that evidence. Do you have any or are you posting in blind
ignorance?

basskisser wrote:
Alotta Fagina wrote:

You wrote:


Please show any and all hard data that you have that suggests
that by opening ANWR, thus supplying around 1 or 2 percent of our
energy demands will have an affect on the prices.

Freshman economics class. Too bad you were smoking dope at the time (or
more likely, weren't even accepted to college).


Again, I can simply prove your ignorance. Please show what evidence you
have that I have ever smoked "dope".
Again, I'll ask you, please show any and all hard data that you have
that suggests that by opening ANWR, that price at the pump will go down.


No $5MM challenge? Wimp.

Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Alotta Fagina wrote:

You wrote:


Please show any and all hard data that you have that suggests
that by opening ANWR, thus supplying around 1 or 2 percent of our
energy demands will have an affect on the prices.

Freshman economics class. Too bad you were smoking dope at the time (or
more likely, weren't even accepted to college).


Again, I can simply prove your ignorance. Please show what evidence you
have that I have ever smoked "dope".
Again, I'll ask you, please show any and all hard data that you have
that suggests that by opening ANWR, that price at the pump will go down.


No $5MM challenge? Wimp.

And now YOUR ignorance is showing. Childish name calling.
And what's an "MM"?