![]() |
|
Nasty boat situation
jamesgangnc wrote:
I wonder if we have any posters that have actually seen them load cars on those ships? Seems to me that you would have to have some sort of tie downs. Wouldn't it be unrealistic to expect 5,000 cars to stay put in a trans-pacific trip? I mean an ordinary storm could cause them to slide? Unless they are on tracks or something. I've not seem how they load them, but most imports have a hook under the front and rear bumpers for exactly that.... Unless those hooks have been eliminated as a "cost savings"... |
Nasty boat situation
|
Nasty boat situation
JoeSpareBedroom wrote: Damn... http://apnews.excite.com/article/200...D8J312E81.html They can't possibly tie down 5,000 cars, I'm betting. So, if they get the thing uprighted, I'll bet there's still a big, big loss |
Nasty boat situation
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: Damn... http://apnews.excite.com/article/200...D8J312E81.html They can't possibly tie down 5,000 cars, I'm betting. So, if they get the thing uprighted, I'll bet there's still a big, big loss I wonder if the REASON was that the cars were not secured properly. Some insurance underwriter must be having the world's biggest headache at the moment. |
Nasty boat situation
I wonder if we have any posters that have actually seen them load cars
on those ships? Seems to me that you would have to have some sort of tie downs. Wouldn't it be unrealistic to expect 5,000 cars to stay put in a trans-pacific trip? I mean an ordinary storm could cause them to slide? Unless they are on tracks or something. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: Damn... http://apnews.excite.com/article/200...D8J312E81.html They can't possibly tie down 5,000 cars, I'm betting. So, if they get the thing uprighted, I'll bet there's still a big, big loss I wonder if the REASON was that the cars were not secured properly. Some insurance underwriter must be having the world's biggest headache at the moment. |
Nasty boat situation
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:06:17 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
Damn... http://apnews.excite.com/article/200...D8J312E81.html Hmm, I wonder what kind of bottom paint they are using. Looks pretty damn clean. |
Nasty boat situation
jamesgangnc wrote: I wonder if we have any posters that have actually seen them load cars on those ships? Seems to me that you would have to have some sort of tie downs. Wouldn't it be unrealistic to expect 5,000 cars to stay put in a trans-pacific trip? I mean an ordinary storm could cause them to slide? Unless they are on tracks or something. Yeah, I wonder. I watched them unload cars in Benecia, CA, but only from the outside. They drove them out so fast that I don't see how in hell they could tie them down! I don't even know how in hell they didn't wreck alot! |
Nasty boat situation
I'm not sure that speed of unloading tells us anything. If they have
some sort of quick tension release and a dozen guys just releasing then they could go pretty fast. basskisser wrote: jamesgangnc wrote: I wonder if we have any posters that have actually seen them load cars on those ships? Seems to me that you would have to have some sort of tie downs. Wouldn't it be unrealistic to expect 5,000 cars to stay put in a trans-pacific trip? I mean an ordinary storm could cause them to slide? Unless they are on tracks or something. Yeah, I wonder. I watched them unload cars in Benecia, CA, but only from the outside. They drove them out so fast that I don't see how in hell they could tie them down! I don't even know how in hell they didn't wreck alot! |
Nasty boat situation
jamesgangnc wrote:
I wonder if we have any posters that have actually seen them load cars on those ships? Seems to me that you would have to have some sort of tie downs. Wouldn't it be unrealistic to expect 5,000 cars to stay put in a trans-pacific trip? I mean an ordinary storm could cause them to slide? Unless they are on tracks or something. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message groups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: Damn... http://apnews.excite.com/article/200...D8J312E81.html They can't possibly tie down 5,000 cars, I'm betting. So, if they get the thing uprighted, I'll bet there's still a big, big loss I wonder if the REASON was that the cars were not secured properly. Some insurance underwriter must be having the world's biggest headache at the moment. I've never loaded those big car carriers...but did help unload one 35 or so years ago when picking up a few hours here & there as a longshoreman (stevedore). The cars were Volvos from Sweden and they were 'lashed down' to fittings on the ships deck. http://www.portofhalifax.ca/AbsPage....iteid=1&lang=1 |
Nasty boat situation
basskisser wrote:
jamesgangnc wrote: I wonder if we have any posters that have actually seen them load cars on those ships? Seems to me that you would have to have some sort of tie downs. Wouldn't it be unrealistic to expect 5,000 cars to stay put in a trans-pacific trip? I mean an ordinary storm could cause them to slide? Unless they are on tracks or something. Yeah, I wonder. I watched them unload cars in Benecia, CA, but only from the outside. They drove them out so fast that I don't see how in hell they could tie them down! I don't even know how in hell they didn't wreck alot! Hee hee! Here certain stevedores were given the task of un-lashing the cars. Others had the fun of driving them off the boat and to a parking area. I remember a Volvo sportscar that resembled the one used by Roger Moore in 'The Saint'. Must admit I came flying up the ramp with that one. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com