|
Heads up, Harry...
|
Heads up, Harry...
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling. So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right? What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute to human effect? I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before the question so it's easy for you to see. Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer their questions? Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO? I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. If you are so sure I'm Kevin, you'd have no risk. Care to take the challenge? Put up, or shut up. You are Kevin Noble, the pot growing and pot smoking idiot from Georgia. Put up or shut up, little boy. Please show what evidence you have of ANY of the above. Or are you just saying that out of pure ignorance? If you are not Kevin Noble I would expect you to ignore me but, you do protest too much so, I will continue to assume you are Kevin Noble until you prove otherwise. I'll prove otherwise, put up the $5000! Put up, or shut up, simple as that. If you had any sense at all, you'd realize that I respond to you because you answer MY posts.....Jeez. Don't answer my posts, don't comment about my posts, don't mention anything to me, and I'd never "respond" to you again. Kevin, I don't want to spoil your fun. You are lucky to still have a job with the amount of posting you from the time you arrive at work until the time you depart from work. Does your boss know that you are stealing from him? Do you smoke pot at work or do you go out into the parking lot to do it? Your chain is easy to pull, very easy to pull. My God you're an idiot. Please prove ANY of the above blather you've posted about me. Can you? Now, let's take the $5000 challenge, shall we? What's the matter, are you scared, little one? Put up or shut up. My boss (me) knows what I do at any given time, by the way. I'll be waiting for your evidence to any of the above. :You don't have any, do you? You've once again proven yourself to be ignorant of any facts. |
Heads up, Harry...
Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: If you were a consumer of alcohol the day before Prohibition took effect, would you stop consuming it the next day, when it became illegal? Yes. In that case, you're exactly the kind of sheep that politicians thrive on. Pot is no worse for you than alcohol. Pot does a job on your lungs, and MAYBE your brain. Booze does a job on your liver, stomach, esophagus, and MAYBE your brain. Pot is illegal because of outmoded beliefs, many of which originated with racist nonsense left over from J. Edgar Hoover's earliest days. Pot is racist? Its use was initially attacked early in the last century by the government because Southern lawmakers thought its use by black people led to madness and criminal behavior. Obviously, these lawmakers were happy to ignore all the violence caused by drunkenness. The next myth used by the law enforcement mob was that pot use led to harder drugs, an anecdote that's been totally shredded by actual statistics. Who's statistics, "High Times"? You really are a pothead like Kevin. What proof do you have that Kevin is a pothead, little one? |
Heads up, Harry...
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling. So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right? What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute to human effect? I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before the question so it's easy for you to see. Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer their questions? Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO? I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. If you are so sure I'm Kevin, you'd have no risk. Care to take the challenge? Put up, or shut up. You are Kevin Noble, the pot growing and pot smoking idiot from Georgia. Put up or shut up, little boy. Please show what evidence you have of ANY of the above. Or are you just saying that out of pure ignorance? If you are not Kevin Noble I would expect you to ignore me but, you do protest too much so, I will continue to assume you are Kevin Noble until you prove otherwise. I'll prove otherwise, put up the $5000! Put up, or shut up, simple as that. If you had any sense at all, you'd realize that I respond to you because you answer MY posts.....Jeez. Don't answer my posts, don't comment about my posts, don't mention anything to me, and I'd never "respond" to you again. Kevin, I don't want to spoil your fun. You are lucky to still have a job with the amount of posting you from the time you arrive at work until the time you depart from work. Does your boss know that you are stealing from him? Do you smoke pot at work or do you go out into the parking lot to do it? Your chain is easy to pull, very easy to pull. My God you're an idiot. Please prove ANY of the above blather you've posted about me. Can you? Now, let's take the $5000 challenge, shall we? What's the matter, are you scared, little one? Put up or shut up. My boss (me) knows what I do at any given time, by the way. I'll be waiting for your evidence to any of the above. :You don't have any, do you? You've once again proven yourself to be ignorant of any facts. Put up $5000 and I'll provide the proof. |
Heads up, Harry...
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: If you were a consumer of alcohol the day before Prohibition took effect, would you stop consuming it the next day, when it became illegal? Yes. In that case, you're exactly the kind of sheep that politicians thrive on. Pot is no worse for you than alcohol. Pot does a job on your lungs, and MAYBE your brain. Booze does a job on your liver, stomach, esophagus, and MAYBE your brain. Pot is illegal because of outmoded beliefs, many of which originated with racist nonsense left over from J. Edgar Hoover's earliest days. Pot is racist? Its use was initially attacked early in the last century by the government because Southern lawmakers thought its use by black people led to madness and criminal behavior. Obviously, these lawmakers were happy to ignore all the violence caused by drunkenness. The next myth used by the law enforcement mob was that pot use led to harder drugs, an anecdote that's been totally shredded by actual statistics. Who's statistics, "High Times"? You really are a pothead like Kevin. What proof do you have that Kevin is a pothead, little one? "little one" that hurts so much coming from a mean nasty prick like you, Kevin. |
Heads up, Harry...
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling. So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right? What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute to human effect? I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before the question so it's easy for you to see. Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer their questions? Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO? I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. If you are so sure I'm Kevin, you'd have no risk. Care to take the challenge? Put up, or shut up. You are Kevin Noble, the pot growing and pot smoking idiot from Georgia. Put up or shut up, little boy. Please show what evidence you have of ANY of the above. Or are you just saying that out of pure ignorance? If you are not Kevin Noble I would expect you to ignore me but, you do protest too much so, I will continue to assume you are Kevin Noble until you prove otherwise. I'll prove otherwise, put up the $5000! Put up, or shut up, simple as that. If you had any sense at all, you'd realize that I respond to you because you answer MY posts.....Jeez. Don't answer my posts, don't comment about my posts, don't mention anything to me, and I'd never "respond" to you again. Kevin, I don't want to spoil your fun. You are lucky to still have a job with the amount of posting you from the time you arrive at work until the time you depart from work. Does your boss know that you are stealing from him? Do you smoke pot at work or do you go out into the parking lot to do it? Your chain is easy to pull, very easy to pull. My God you're an idiot. Please prove ANY of the above blather you've posted about me. Can you? Now, let's take the $5000 challenge, shall we? What's the matter, are you scared, little one? Put up or shut up. My boss (me) knows what I do at any given time, by the way. I'll be waiting for your evidence to any of the above. :You don't have any, do you? You've once again proven yourself to be ignorant of any facts. Unlike you, Kevin, I have to go to work now. So, while you and Doug Kanter are posting to USENET while you are "working" I'll actually be working. I'll check the group around 9:00 PM or later today. |
Heads up, Harry...
wrote in message
oups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: What's a pothead? Your definition, please. Watch it man, now you're starting to sound like ****Basser..... It's a trick. Watch and laugh. I am watching, and yes, I am laughing... Burt's going to say that a pothead is someone who uses pot, regardless of the amount or frequency of use. Then, I'll tell him that anyone who uses alcohol is an alcoholic, unable to function productively. This will be fun. |
Heads up, Harry...
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: If you were a consumer of alcohol the day before Prohibition took effect, would you stop consuming it the next day, when it became illegal? Yes. In that case, you're exactly the kind of sheep that politicians thrive on. Pot is no worse for you than alcohol. Pot does a job on your lungs, and MAYBE your brain. Booze does a job on your liver, stomach, esophagus, and MAYBE your brain. Pot is illegal because of outmoded beliefs, many of which originated with racist nonsense left over from J. Edgar Hoover's earliest days. Pot is racist? Its use was initially attacked early in the last century by the government because Southern lawmakers thought its use by black people led to madness and criminal behavior. Obviously, these lawmakers were happy to ignore all the violence caused by drunkenness. The next myth used by the law enforcement mob was that pot use led to harder drugs, an anecdote that's been totally shredded by actual statistics. Who's statistics, "High Times"? You really are a pothead like Kevin. What proof do you have that Kevin is a pothead, little one? "little one" that hurts so much coming from a mean nasty prick like you, Kevin. Care to take the $5000 challenge? Put up, or shut up. |
Heads up, Harry...
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling. So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right? What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute to human effect? I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before the question so it's easy for you to see. Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer their questions? Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO? I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. If you are so sure I'm Kevin, you'd have no risk. Care to take the challenge? Put up, or shut up. You are Kevin Noble, the pot growing and pot smoking idiot from Georgia. Put up or shut up, little boy. Please show what evidence you have of ANY of the above. Or are you just saying that out of pure ignorance? If you are not Kevin Noble I would expect you to ignore me but, you do protest too much so, I will continue to assume you are Kevin Noble until you prove otherwise. I'll prove otherwise, put up the $5000! Put up, or shut up, simple as that. If you had any sense at all, you'd realize that I respond to you because you answer MY posts.....Jeez. Don't answer my posts, don't comment about my posts, don't mention anything to me, and I'd never "respond" to you again. Kevin, I don't want to spoil your fun. You are lucky to still have a job with the amount of posting you from the time you arrive at work until the time you depart from work. Does your boss know that you are stealing from him? Do you smoke pot at work or do you go out into the parking lot to do it? Your chain is easy to pull, very easy to pull. My God you're an idiot. Please prove ANY of the above blather you've posted about me. Can you? Now, let's take the $5000 challenge, shall we? What's the matter, are you scared, little one? Put up or shut up. My boss (me) knows what I do at any given time, by the way. I'll be waiting for your evidence to any of the above. :You don't have any, do you? You've once again proven yourself to be ignorant of any facts. Unlike you, Kevin, I have to go to work now. So, while you and Doug Kanter are posting to USENET while you are "working" I'll actually be working. I'll check the group around 9:00 PM or later today. You can just say that you are ignorant of any facts relating to what you are blathering about above. Everyone here knows. |
Heads up, Harry...
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: If you were a consumer of alcohol the day before Prohibition took effect, would you stop consuming it the next day, when it became illegal? Yes. In that case, you're exactly the kind of sheep that politicians thrive on. Pot is no worse for you than alcohol. Pot does a job on your lungs, and MAYBE your brain. Booze does a job on your liver, stomach, esophagus, and MAYBE your brain. Pot is illegal because of outmoded beliefs, many of which originated with racist nonsense left over from J. Edgar Hoover's earliest days. Pot is racist? Its use was initially attacked early in the last century by the government because Southern lawmakers thought its use by black people led to madness and criminal behavior. Obviously, these lawmakers were happy to ignore all the violence caused by drunkenness. The next myth used by the law enforcement mob was that pot use led to harder drugs, an anecdote that's been totally shredded by actual statistics. Who's statistics, "High Times"? You really are a pothead like Kevin. What proof do you have that Kevin is a pothead, little one? "little one" that hurts so much coming from a mean nasty prick like you, Kevin. Calling names again Bert? Too bad the local sheriff seems to favour the Dark Side! |
Heads up, Harry...
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: If you were a consumer of alcohol the day before Prohibition took effect, would you stop consuming it the next day, when it became illegal? Yes. In that case, you're exactly the kind of sheep that politicians thrive on. Pot is no worse for you than alcohol. Pot does a job on your lungs, and MAYBE your brain. Booze does a job on your liver, stomach, esophagus, and MAYBE your brain. Pot is illegal because of outmoded beliefs, many of which originated with racist nonsense left over from J. Edgar Hoover's earliest days. Pot is racist? Its use was initially attacked early in the last century by the government because Southern lawmakers thought its use by black people led to madness and criminal behavior. Obviously, these lawmakers were happy to ignore all the violence caused by drunkenness. The next myth used by the law enforcement mob was that pot use led to harder drugs, an anecdote that's been totally shredded by actual statistics. Who's statistics, "High Times"? You really are a pothead like Kevin. What proof do you have that Kevin is a pothead, little one? Referring to yourself in the third person. Nice! |
Heads up, Harry... (Hey, Joe).. (let this be a lesson to us all)...
Chuck Gould wrote:
Trying to troll "just a little" is like trying to be only slightly pregnant. Congrats to the usual players, as we are up to a gazillion posts and the conversation is down to "You're a pothead" vs. "You're an alcoholic" A proud moment indeed for this group. We need to stick to the topic, or darn close to the topic, when we launch threads. You are most welcome! What's the next topic? |
Heads up, Harry...
Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: If you were a consumer of alcohol the day before Prohibition took effect, would you stop consuming it the next day, when it became illegal? Yes. In that case, you're exactly the kind of sheep that politicians thrive on. Pot is no worse for you than alcohol. Pot does a job on your lungs, and MAYBE your brain. Booze does a job on your liver, stomach, esophagus, and MAYBE your brain. Pot is illegal because of outmoded beliefs, many of which originated with racist nonsense left over from J. Edgar Hoover's earliest days. Pot is racist? Its use was initially attacked early in the last century by the government because Southern lawmakers thought its use by black people led to madness and criminal behavior. Obviously, these lawmakers were happy to ignore all the violence caused by drunkenness. The next myth used by the law enforcement mob was that pot use led to harder drugs, an anecdote that's been totally shredded by actual statistics. Who's statistics, "High Times"? You really are a pothead like Kevin. What proof do you have that Kevin is a pothead, little one? Referring to yourself in the third person. Nice! Care to take the $5000 challenge? You seem so sure of yourself, so what have you got to lose? Put up, or shut up? |
Heads up, Harry... (Hey, Joe).. (let this be a lesson to us all)...
Bert Robbins wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: Trying to troll "just a little" is like trying to be only slightly pregnant. Congrats to the usual players, as we are up to a gazillion posts and the conversation is down to "You're a pothead" vs. "You're an alcoholic" A proud moment indeed for this group. We need to stick to the topic, or darn close to the topic, when we launch threads. You are most welcome! What's the next topic? Irony doesn't work with you I see, because you're not bright enough to get it. |
Heads up, Harry... (Hey, Joe).. (let this be a lesson to us all)...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. .. Chuck Gould wrote: Trying to troll "just a little" is like trying to be only slightly pregnant. Congrats to the usual players, as we are up to a gazillion posts and the conversation is down to "You're a pothead" vs. "You're an alcoholic" A proud moment indeed for this group. We need to stick to the topic, or darn close to the topic, when we launch threads. You are most welcome! What's the next topic? Oh....we're not done with this yet. I asked you a question. What is your definition of a pothead, Bert? No links to anyone else's thoughts. I want YOUR definition. If you use a word, it's safe to assume you can define it. |
Heads up, Harry...
I would think that you'd finally accept the fact that Bert and Dan,
would jist as soon keep their money and call you Kevin for free... basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: If you were a consumer of alcohol the day before Prohibition took effect, would you stop consuming it the next day, when it became illegal? Yes. In that case, you're exactly the kind of sheep that politicians thrive on. Pot is no worse for you than alcohol. Pot does a job on your lungs, and MAYBE your brain. Booze does a job on your liver, stomach, esophagus, and MAYBE your brain. Pot is illegal because of outmoded beliefs, many of which originated with racist nonsense left over from J. Edgar Hoover's earliest days. Pot is racist? Its use was initially attacked early in the last century by the government because Southern lawmakers thought its use by black people led to madness and criminal behavior. Obviously, these lawmakers were happy to ignore all the violence caused by drunkenness. The next myth used by the law enforcement mob was that pot use led to harder drugs, an anecdote that's been totally shredded by actual statistics. Who's statistics, "High Times"? You really are a pothead like Kevin. What proof do you have that Kevin is a pothead, little one? Referring to yourself in the third person. Nice! Care to take the $5000 challenge? You seem so sure of yourself, so what have you got to lose? Put up, or shut up? |
Heads up, Harry...
wrote: I would think that you'd finally accept the fact that Bert and Dan, would jist as soon keep their money and call you Kevin for free... That may be true. It's amazing at the amount of stuff that those two post out of ignorance. |
Heads up, Harry... (Hey, Joe).. (let this be a lesson to us all)...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. Chuck Gould wrote: Trying to troll "just a little" is like trying to be only slightly pregnant. Congrats to the usual players, as we are up to a gazillion posts and the conversation is down to "You're a pothead" vs. "You're an alcoholic" A proud moment indeed for this group. We need to stick to the topic, or darn close to the topic, when we launch threads. You are most welcome! What's the next topic? Oh....we're not done with this yet. I asked you a question. What is your definition of a pothead, Bert? No links to anyone else's thoughts. I want YOUR definition. If you use a word, it's safe to assume you can define it. I am done. |
Heads up, Harry... (Hey, Joe).. (let this be a lesson to us all)...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. Chuck Gould wrote: Trying to troll "just a little" is like trying to be only slightly pregnant. Congrats to the usual players, as we are up to a gazillion posts and the conversation is down to "You're a pothead" vs. "You're an alcoholic" A proud moment indeed for this group. We need to stick to the topic, or darn close to the topic, when we launch threads. You are most welcome! What's the next topic? Oh....we're not done with this yet. I asked you a question. What is your definition of a pothead, Bert? No links to anyone else's thoughts. I want YOUR definition. If you use a word, it's safe to assume you can define it. I am done. So, a pothead is someone who uses pot. Doesn't matter if they use it twice a year. They're a pothead. You use alcohol, therefore you are an alcoholic. |
Heads up, Harry... (Hey, Joe).. (let this be a lesson to us all)...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. Chuck Gould wrote: Trying to troll "just a little" is like trying to be only slightly pregnant. Congrats to the usual players, as we are up to a gazillion posts and the conversation is down to "You're a pothead" vs. "You're an alcoholic" A proud moment indeed for this group. We need to stick to the topic, or darn close to the topic, when we launch threads. You are most welcome! What's the next topic? Oh....we're not done with this yet. I asked you a question. What is your definition of a pothead, Bert? No links to anyone else's thoughts. I want YOUR definition. If you use a word, it's safe to assume you can define it. I am done. So, a pothead is someone who uses pot. Doesn't matter if they use it twice a year. They're a pothead. You use alcohol, therefore you are an alcoholic. There's little doubt Bert is an alky. Personal opinions aside, I'm just using his definition. |
Heads up, Harry...
basskisser wrote:
wrote: I would think that you'd finally accept the fact that Bert and Dan, would jist as soon keep their money and call you Kevin for free... That may be true. It's amazing at the amount of stuff that those two post out of ignorance. And that would be...what? Move on. Kevin. |
Heads up, Harry...
"Dan Krueger" wrote in message nk.net... basskisser wrote: wrote: I would think that you'd finally accept the fact that Bert and Dan, would jist as soon keep their money and call you Kevin for free... That may be true. It's amazing at the amount of stuff that those two post out of ignorance. And that would be...what? Move on. Kevin. Actually all of you need to move on. |
Heads up, Harry...
Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: I would think that you'd finally accept the fact that Bert and Dan, would jist as soon keep their money and call you Kevin for free... That may be true. It's amazing at the amount of stuff that those two post out of ignorance. And that would be...what? That I'm Kevin. Care to take the $5000 challenge, or would you rather just post in ignorance? Put up, or shut up. Move on. Kevin. Put up, or shut up. Come on, get a spine. If you are so sure of yourself, take the challenge, what have you got to lose? |
Heads up, Harry...
Harry Krause wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: I would think that you'd finally accept the fact that Bert and Dan, would jist as soon keep their money and call you Kevin for free... That may be true. It's amazing at the amount of stuff that those two post out of ignorance. And that would be...what? That I'm Kevin. Care to take the $5000 challenge, or would you rather just post in ignorance? Put up, or shut up. Move on. Kevin. Put up, or shut up. Come on, get a spine. If you are so sure of yourself, take the challenge, what have you got to lose? As these posts have nothing to do with me, I am invoking my copyright privileges and billing both of you $1.00 each for use of my name. Remit or Guido will be stopping by for a chat. I ain't skeered. |
Heads up, Harry...
Harry Krause wrote: basskisser wrote: Harry Krause wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: I would think that you'd finally accept the fact that Bert and Dan, would jist as soon keep their money and call you Kevin for free... That may be true. It's amazing at the amount of stuff that those two post out of ignorance. And that would be...what? That I'm Kevin. Care to take the $5000 challenge, or would you rather just post in ignorance? Put up, or shut up. Move on. Kevin. Put up, or shut up. Come on, get a spine. If you are so sure of yourself, take the challenge, what have you got to lose? As these posts have nothing to do with me, I am invoking my copyright privileges and billing both of you $1.00 each for use of my name. Remit or Guido will be stopping by for a chat. I ain't skeered. You ain't seen Guido. 6'7" 255 pounds polyester pants white belt and shoes. He'd blind me with that get up! |
Heads up, Harry...
Harry Krause wrote:
basskisser wrote: Harry Krause wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: I would think that you'd finally accept the fact that Bert and Dan, would jist as soon keep their money and call you Kevin for free... That may be true. It's amazing at the amount of stuff that those two post out of ignorance. And that would be...what? That I'm Kevin. Care to take the $5000 challenge, or would you rather just post in ignorance? Put up, or shut up. Move on. Kevin. Put up, or shut up. Come on, get a spine. If you are so sure of yourself, take the challenge, what have you got to lose? As these posts have nothing to do with me, I am invoking my copyright privileges and billing both of you $1.00 each for use of my name. Remit or Guido will be stopping by for a chat. I ain't skeered. You ain't seen Guido. 6'7" 255 pounds polyester pants white belt and shoes. Yeah but..does he carry a Sheriff's badge? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com