|
Heads up, Harry...
Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. ? wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that: 1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans) It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high school physics is aware of this fact. Please quantify the HUMAN effect. He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton from observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global warming equation. This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple idea: Do we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except those who require the baby steps. The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in the whole global warming of planets issue. Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above sentence. The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you instead had your head up your ass. Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up the issue, huh? The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin. Kevin will be back on the newsgroup Monday morning, expect a snide retort then. |
Heads up, Harry...
I've also seen some Sat. and Sun posts. Maybe his kids let him have the computer for a moment. Bert Robbins wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. ? wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that: 1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans) It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high school physics is aware of this fact. Please quantify the HUMAN effect. He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton from observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global warming equation. This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple idea: Do we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except those who require the baby steps. The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in the whole global warming of planets issue. Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above sentence. The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you instead had your head up your ass. Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up the issue, huh? The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin. Kevin will be back on the newsgroup Monday morning, expect a snide retort then. |
Heads up, Harry...
Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message om... ? wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message legroups.com... When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that: 1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans) It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high school physics is aware of this fact. Please quantify the HUMAN effect. He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton from observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global warming equation. This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple idea: Do we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except those who require the baby steps. The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in the whole global warming of planets issue. Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above sentence. The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you instead had your head up your ass. Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up the issue, huh? The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin. Care to take the $5000 challenge to prove I'm not Kevin? Put up or shut up. |
Heads up, Harry...
Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling. So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right? What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute to human effect? I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before the question so it's easy for you to see. Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer their questions? Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO? I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. |
Heads up, Harry...
Bert Robbins wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. ? wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that: 1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans) It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high school physics is aware of this fact. Please quantify the HUMAN effect. He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton from observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global warming equation. This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple idea: Do we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except those who require the baby steps. The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in the whole global warming of planets issue. Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above sentence. The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you instead had your head up your ass. Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up the issue, huh? The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin. Kevin will be back on the newsgroup Monday morning, expect a snide retort then. Bert, care to take the $5000 challenge to prove that I'm not Kevin? Put up or shut up. |
Heads up, Harry...
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com... Bert, care to take the $5000 challenge to prove that I'm not Kevin? Put up or shut up. How would that work, anyway? |
Heads up, Harry...
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling. So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right? What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute to human effect? I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before the question so it's easy for you to see. Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer their questions? Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO? I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. |
Heads up, Harry...
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. ? wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that: 1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans) It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high school physics is aware of this fact. Please quantify the HUMAN effect. He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton from observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global warming equation. This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple idea: Do we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except those who require the baby steps. The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in the whole global warming of planets issue. Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above sentence. The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you instead had your head up your ass. Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up the issue, huh? The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin. Kevin will be back on the newsgroup Monday morning, expect a snide retort then. Bert, care to take the $5000 challenge to prove that I'm not Kevin? Put up or shut up. Sure, you go first and if I believe you I might give you $5.00. |
Heads up, Harry...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
... basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling. So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right? What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute to human effect? I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before the question so it's easy for you to see. Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer their questions? Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO? I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS. |
Heads up, Harry...
wrote in message oups.com... HA! basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Yeah, kind of makes me feel bad for picking on someone with such little intellect. So, you DO like to pick on people. how brave and manly....... I'm more brave and manly than you'll ever be. Grow up. Better watch out or he will next threaten to kick your ass with his Karate moves. |
Heads up, Harry...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling. So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right? What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute to human effect? I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before the question so it's easy for you to see. Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer their questions? Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO? I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS. Just for you Doug I will post it here. Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in the sky and feel the heat radiating from it. |
Heads up, Harry...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling. So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right? What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute to human effect? I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before the question so it's easy for you to see. Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer their questions? Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO? I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS. Just for you Doug I will post it here. Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in the sky and feel the heat radiating from it. Silly child. |
Heads up, Harry...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling. So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right? What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute to human effect? I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before the question so it's easy for you to see. Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer their questions? Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO? I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS. Just for you Doug I will post it here. Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in the sky and feel the heat radiating from it. Silly child. If you are under the delusion that the Sun has no effect on the Earth then you are the real silly child due to the fact that you are trying to change peoples behavior under the misguided premise that global warming is just another tool to use in the class warfare struggle. |
Heads up, Harry...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in the sky and feel the heat radiating from it. This has been well studied since intuitively it appears obvious. However, the best calculation for the sun's affect on earth warming due to radiation levels over the 22 year sun cycle is a tenth of 1 degree F. It's a non-event. Eisboch |
Heads up, Harry...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. .. be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS. Just for you Doug I will post it here. Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in the sky and feel the heat radiating from it. Silly child. If you are under the delusion that the Sun has no effect on the Earth then you are the real silly child due to the fact that you are trying to change peoples behavior under the misguided premise that global warming is just another tool to use in the class warfare struggle. I wish I knew where you got the idea that I believe that nonsense about the sun having no effect. But, it really doesn't matter. I know the REAL reason why you resist the idea that we might be contributing to warming. You're afraid that if it were proven, you would be asked to make behavioral changes, and you would interpret that as an attempt to control you. If George Bush himself walked into your house and told you the human connection was significant, you would slap his face and accuse him of switching parties. If your own kid found the proof, you'd disown him. |
Heads up, Harry...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS. Just for you Doug I will post it here. Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in the sky and feel the heat radiating from it. Silly child. If you are under the delusion that the Sun has no effect on the Earth then you are the real silly child due to the fact that you are trying to change peoples behavior under the misguided premise that global warming is just another tool to use in the class warfare struggle. I wish I knew where you got the idea that I believe that nonsense about the sun having no effect. But, it really doesn't matter. I know the REAL reason why you resist the idea that we might be contributing to warming. You're afraid that if it were proven, you would be asked to make behavioral changes, and you would interpret that as an attempt to control you. If George Bush himself walked into your house and told you the human connection was significant, you would slap his face and accuse him of switching parties. If your own kid the proof, you'd disown him. The human connection is nowhere near what you believe it is. Natural events both localized to this planet and external to this planet are the major cause of this particular episode global warming we are experiencing. The real sad thing is that you humans have caused global warming still have accepted that this isn't the first time that the Earth has experienced global warming. All previous global warming events precede humans use of fire. George Bush has already crossed over to the Democrats side, he is a lame duck and is out of touch with those who got him twice elected to the presidency. My eldest daughter has asked me on several occasions if I would vote for her when she runs for POTUS and my response has always been that I would if she was running as a Republican. |
Heads up, Harry...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS. Just for you Doug I will post it here. Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in the sky and feel the heat radiating from it. Silly child. If you are under the delusion that the Sun has no effect on the Earth then you are the real silly child due to the fact that you are trying to change peoples behavior under the misguided premise that global warming is just another tool to use in the class warfare struggle. I wish I knew where you got the idea that I believe that nonsense about the sun having no effect. But, it really doesn't matter. I know the REAL reason why you resist the idea that we might be contributing to warming. You're afraid that if it were proven, you would be asked to make behavioral changes, and you would interpret that as an attempt to control you. If George Bush himself walked into your house and told you the human connection was significant, you would slap his face and accuse him of switching parties. If your own kid the proof, you'd disown him. The human connection is nowhere near what you believe it is. But, you have no idea what I believe is the extent of the connection. You keep using that combination of words, which is what makes this so much fun. You're the poster boy for reading comprehension problems. |
Heads up, Harry...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS. Just for you Doug I will post it here. Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in the sky and feel the heat radiating from it. Silly child. If you are under the delusion that the Sun has no effect on the Earth then you are the real silly child due to the fact that you are trying to change peoples behavior under the misguided premise that global warming is just another tool to use in the class warfare struggle. I wish I knew where you got the idea that I believe that nonsense about the sun having no effect. But, it really doesn't matter. I know the REAL reason why you resist the idea that we might be contributing to warming. You're afraid that if it were proven, you would be asked to make behavioral changes, and you would interpret that as an attempt to control you. If George Bush himself walked into your house and told you the human connection was significant, you would slap his face and accuse him of switching parties. If your own kid the proof, you'd disown him. The human connection is nowhere near what you believe it is. But, you have no idea what I believe is the extent of the connection. You keep using that combination of words, which is what makes this so much fun. You're the poster boy for reading comprehension problems. Why don't you just state what you believe. Or, do you want to keep it to yourself and use this as a point of argument? You really are a piece of work Doug. You refuse to stand up and state what you believe because you are afraid, yes afraid, that other people will disagree with you and you will then have to defend your positon, rather than attacking everyone else's. |
Heads up, Harry...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Bert, care to take the $5000 challenge to prove that I'm not Kevin? Put up or shut up. How would that work, anyway? Simple, I've said all along that I'm not Kevin. I offered to prove that point to anyone who would put up $5000 to John's charity. So far, the blow hards are just that. Not willing to risk the $5000, which, if they are so sure that I'm Kevin, wouldn't be a risk at all. |
Heads up, Harry...
|
Heads up, Harry...
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling. So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right? What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute to human effect? I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before the question so it's easy for you to see. Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer their questions? Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO? I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. If you are so sure I'm Kevin, you'd have no risk. Care to take the challenge? Put up, or shut up. |
Heads up, Harry...
|
Heads up, Harry...
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 11:37:49 -0400, " JimH"
jimhUNDERSCOREosudad@yahooDOTcom wrote: wrote in message roups.com... HA! basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Yeah, kind of makes me feel bad for picking on someone with such little intellect. So, you DO like to pick on people. how brave and manly....... I'm more brave and manly than you'll ever be. Grow up. Better watch out or he will next threaten to kick your ass with his Karate moves. Perhaps, JimH, you should heed your own words? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
Heads up, Harry...
|
Heads up, Harry...
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling. So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right? What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute to human effect? I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before the question so it's easy for you to see. Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer their questions? Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO? I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. If you are so sure I'm Kevin, you'd have no risk. Care to take the challenge? Put up, or shut up. You are Kevin Noble, the pot growing and pot smoking idiot from Georgia. |
Heads up, Harry...
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. ? wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that: 1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans) It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high school physics is aware of this fact. Please quantify the HUMAN effect. He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton from observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global warming equation. This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple idea: Do we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except those who require the baby steps. The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in the whole global warming of planets issue. Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above sentence. The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you instead had your head up your ass. Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up the issue, huh? The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin. Kevin will be back on the newsgroup Monday morning, expect a snide retort then. Bert, care to take the $5000 challenge to prove that I'm not Kevin? Put up or shut up. Sure, you go first and if I believe you I might give you $5.00. What's the matter, not willing to risk the money, little guy? If you are so damned sure of yourself, there is no risk. Put up or shut up. Why are you so hung up on $5000? If it is the principle of the thing then a bet of $1 should suffice. |
Heads up, Harry...
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:20:07 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote:
Why are you so hung up on $5000? If it is the principle of the thing then a bet of $1 should suffice. The cause is the Breast Cancer Foundation, to which $5000 means more than $1, -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
Heads up, Harry...
JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:20:07 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote: Why are you so hung up on $5000? If it is the principle of the thing then a bet of $1 should suffice. The cause is the Breast Cancer Foundation, to which $5000 means more than $1, I have numerous other charities that I contribute too for specific reasons. Kevin is trying to bully people into a contribution under the guise of a wager. If Kevin is really interested in proving me wrong then he will be willing to make a gentleman's bet of $1. |
Heads up, Harry...
you're absolutely right John, especially for your daughters cause.
Agreed! $5K IS worth more than a buck. but his name isn't...... JohnH wrote: On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:20:07 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote: Why are you so hung up on $5000? If it is the principle of the thing then a bet of $1 should suffice. The cause is the Breast Cancer Foundation, to which $5000 means more than $1, -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
Heads up, Harry...
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:42:37 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:20:07 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote: Why are you so hung up on $5000? If it is the principle of the thing then a bet of $1 should suffice. The cause is the Breast Cancer Foundation, to which $5000 means more than $1, I have numerous other charities that I contribute too for specific reasons. Kevin is trying to bully people into a contribution under the guise of a wager. If Kevin is really interested in proving me wrong then he will be willing to make a gentleman's bet of $1. Nope. If I were bk, I'd hold out for the $5000. If you're sure of yourself, what've you got to lose? If you're not sure, then maybe it's just name-calling. -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
Heads up, Harry...
|
Heads up, Harry...
|
Heads up, Harry...
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling. So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right? What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute to human effect? I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before the question so it's easy for you to see. Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer their questions? Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO? I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. If you are so sure I'm Kevin, you'd have no risk. Care to take the challenge? Put up, or shut up. You are Kevin Noble, the pot growing and pot smoking idiot from Georgia. Put up or shut up, little boy. Please show what evidence you have of ANY of the above. Or are you just saying that out of pure ignorance? |
Heads up, Harry...
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. ? wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that: 1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans) It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high school physics is aware of this fact. Please quantify the HUMAN effect. He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton from observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global warming equation. This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple idea: Do we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except those who require the baby steps. The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in the whole global warming of planets issue. Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above sentence. The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you instead had your head up your ass. Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up the issue, huh? The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin. Kevin will be back on the newsgroup Monday morning, expect a snide retort then. Bert, care to take the $5000 challenge to prove that I'm not Kevin? Put up or shut up. Sure, you go first and if I believe you I might give you $5.00. What's the matter, not willing to risk the money, little guy? If you are so damned sure of yourself, there is no risk. Put up or shut up. Why are you so hung up on $5000? If it is the principle of the thing then a bet of $1 should suffice. Because I think it's high time you paid for your ignorance. |
Heads up, Harry...
|
Heads up, Harry...
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Bert, care to take the $5000 challenge to prove that I'm not Kevin? Put up or shut up. How would that work, anyway? Simple, I've said all along that I'm not Kevin. I offered to prove that point to anyone who would put up $5000 to John's charity. So far, the blow hards are just that. Not willing to risk the $5000, which, if they are so sure that I'm Kevin, wouldn't be a risk at all. Maybe if you say you'll give the money to Greenpeace, they'd jump at the opportunity. Or not. :-) |
Heads up, Harry...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. be 0.0000000000001% Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not be significant. You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you are blind to them. You're absolutely right. When will YOU be publishing your research methods? Don't give me links to someone else's. I want to see YOURS. Just for you Doug I will post it here. Go outside on a cloudless day and look up at the bright shinny thing in the sky and feel the heat radiating from it. Silly child. If you are under the delusion that the Sun has no effect on the Earth then you are the real silly child due to the fact that you are trying to change peoples behavior under the misguided premise that global warming is just another tool to use in the class warfare struggle. I wish I knew where you got the idea that I believe that nonsense about the sun having no effect. But, it really doesn't matter. I know the REAL reason why you resist the idea that we might be contributing to warming. You're afraid that if it were proven, you would be asked to make behavioral changes, and you would interpret that as an attempt to control you. If George Bush himself walked into your house and told you the human connection was significant, you would slap his face and accuse him of switching parties. If your own kid the proof, you'd disown him. The human connection is nowhere near what you believe it is. But, you have no idea what I believe is the extent of the connection. You keep using that combination of words, which is what makes this so much fun. You're the poster boy for reading comprehension problems. Why don't you just state what you believe. Or, do you want to keep it to yourself and use this as a point of argument? You really are a piece of work Doug. You refuse to stand up and state what you believe because you are afraid, yes afraid, that other people will disagree with you and you will then have to defend your positon, rather than attacking everyone else's. Actually, my only belief is that there IS a connection. It is physically impossible for there NOT to be. I also believe that it could not hurt ANYONE if we began changing our habits as if there were proof that there were a BIG connection. Now, you'll disagree with the "could not hurt anyone" part. I am prepared to be amused. Bring it on. |
Heads up, Harry...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. .. If you are so sure I'm Kevin, you'd have no risk. Care to take the challenge? Put up, or shut up. You are Kevin Noble, the pot growing and pot smoking idiot from Georgia. So what if he grows or smokes pot? Why do you imagine that to be a problem? |
Heads up, Harry...
Bert Robbins wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. ? wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that: 1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans) It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high school physics is aware of this fact. Please quantify the HUMAN effect. He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton from observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global warming equation. This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple idea: Do we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except those who require the baby steps. The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in the whole global warming of planets issue. Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above sentence. The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you instead had your head up your ass. Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up the issue, huh? The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin. Kevin will be back on the newsgroup Monday morning, expect a snide retort then. Not this time. I read ahead... |
Heads up, Harry...
basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message news:krCdnZiud7DUtSnZnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@comcast .com... ? wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message oglegroups.com... When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that: 1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans) It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high school physics is aware of this fact. Please quantify the HUMAN effect. He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton from observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global warming equation. This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple idea: Do we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except those who require the baby steps. The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in the whole global warming of planets issue. Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above sentence. The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you instead had your head up your ass. Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up the issue, huh? The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin. Care to take the $5000 challenge to prove I'm not Kevin? Put up or shut up. I don't care who you are. You emailed me as Kevin Noble so I will respond to you as Kevin Noble. I've read your lame excuses for "borrowing" his name. Anyone could post under an alias for six month, **** a bunch of people off, and come back as a more reasonable poster and offer a $5000 or even a $50,000 "challenge". Bottom line - who cares. YOU identified yourself as Kevin so deal with with it, Kevin. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com