"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Harry Krause wrote:
I'm looking for a new semi-portable air compressor for various
purposes.

Here's a spec for the models I am considering.


CFM/PSI 3.6@100 3.8@100 4.5@100


Let's say I have a tire on a 17" wheel to fill to 55 psi.

What is the approximate time it will take each of these compressors to
fill the tire, everything else being equal?

Is there a formula?

Thanks (English major here)

The size of the tank is important here, as well as the maximum tank
psi. If your compressor has a larger tank than the volume of the tire,
then it's almost instantaneous, slowed down only by the size of the
various component openings like valve stems, hose, fittings, etc.

It's not instantaneous. It's slowed down a great deal by the valve stem
diameter...much more than you assumption accounted for.

Really, then why in hell do you think I stated:

"The size of the tank is important here, as well as the maximum tank
psi. If your compressor has a larger tank than the volume of the tire,
then it's almost instantaneous, slowed down only by the size of the
various component openings like valve stems, hose, fittings, etc."
??????

I acknowledged that you said that. But I also said that the valve stem
slows things down a lot more than you accounted for. Thus, it's hardly
*instantaneous*.

NOYB wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Harry Krause wrote:
I'm looking for a new semi-portable air compressor for various
purposes.

Here's a spec for the models I am considering.


CFM/PSI 3.6@100 3.8@100 4.5@100


Let's say I have a tire on a 17" wheel to fill to 55 psi.

What is the approximate time it will take each of these compressors to
fill the tire, everything else being equal?

Is there a formula?

Thanks (English major here)

The size of the tank is important here, as well as the maximum tank
psi. If your compressor has a larger tank than the volume of the tire,
then it's almost instantaneous, slowed down only by the size of the
various component openings like valve stems, hose, fittings, etc.

It's not instantaneous. It's slowed down a great deal by the valve stem
diameter...much more than you assumption accounted for.

Really, then why in hell do you think I stated:

"The size of the tank is important here, as well as the maximum tank
psi. If your compressor has a larger tank than the volume of the tire,
then it's almost instantaneous, slowed down only by the size of the
various component openings like valve stems, hose, fittings, etc."
??????

I acknowledged that you said that. But I also said that the valve stem
slows things down a lot more than you accounted for. Thus, it's hardly
*instantaneous*.

Alot more than I accounted for?? How much DID I "account for"?

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Harry Krause wrote:
I'm looking for a new semi-portable air compressor for various
purposes.

Here's a spec for the models I am considering.


CFM/PSI 3.6@100 3.8@100 4.5@100


Let's say I have a tire on a 17" wheel to fill to 55 psi.

What is the approximate time it will take each of these compressors
to
fill the tire, everything else being equal?

Is there a formula?

Thanks (English major here)

The size of the tank is important here, as well as the maximum tank
psi. If your compressor has a larger tank than the volume of the
tire,
then it's almost instantaneous, slowed down only by the size of the
various component openings like valve stems, hose, fittings, etc.

It's not instantaneous. It's slowed down a great deal by the valve
stem
diameter...much more than you assumption accounted for.

Really, then why in hell do you think I stated:

"The size of the tank is important here, as well as the maximum tank
psi. If your compressor has a larger tank than the volume of the tire,
then it's almost instantaneous, slowed down only by the size of the
various component openings like valve stems, hose, fittings, etc."
??????

I acknowledged that you said that. But I also said that the valve stem
slows things down a lot more than you accounted for. Thus, it's hardly
*instantaneous*.

Alot more than I accounted for?? How much DID I "account for"?

Apparently not enough. You described a couple of minutes of filling time as
"nearly instantaneous".

NOYB wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Harry Krause wrote:
I'm looking for a new semi-portable air compressor for various
purposes.

Here's a spec for the models I am considering.


CFM/PSI 3.6@100 3.8@100 4.5@100


Let's say I have a tire on a 17" wheel to fill to 55 psi.

What is the approximate time it will take each of these compressors
to
fill the tire, everything else being equal?

Is there a formula?

Thanks (English major here)

The size of the tank is important here, as well as the maximum tank
psi. If your compressor has a larger tank than the volume of the
tire,
then it's almost instantaneous, slowed down only by the size of the
various component openings like valve stems, hose, fittings, etc.

It's not instantaneous. It's slowed down a great deal by the valve
stem
diameter...much more than you assumption accounted for.

Really, then why in hell do you think I stated:

"The size of the tank is important here, as well as the maximum tank
psi. If your compressor has a larger tank than the volume of the tire,
then it's almost instantaneous, slowed down only by the size of the
various component openings like valve stems, hose, fittings, etc."
??????

I acknowledged that you said that. But I also said that the valve stem
slows things down a lot more than you accounted for. Thus, it's hardly
*instantaneous*.

Alot more than I accounted for?? How much DID I "account for"?

Apparently not enough. You described a couple of minutes of filling time as
"nearly instantaneous".

Nope. Never said "nearly instantaneous". I guess you can't read very
well. But, anyway, I said "almost instantaneous", but more than that
you fail to see the qualifier after, which would read "almost
instantaneous, SLOWED DOWN ONY :BY........."

Now, I'll ask again, since you seem to be able to read minds, how much
DID I "account" for? You do realize that a statement like "almost
instantaneous" is relative, don't you? "Almost instantaneous" has a
much different meaning if we are using it to describe something
happening in a galaxy millions of light years from here, than it does
when using it to describe something happening in a nanochip.

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

"Almost instantaneous" has a
much different meaning if we are using it to describe something
happening in a galaxy millions of light years from here

That explains it. basskisser's galaxy.

NOYB wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

"Almost instantaneous" has a
much different meaning if we are using it to describe something
happening in a galaxy millions of light years from here

That explains it. basskisser's galaxy.

Damn, you are just too narrow minded to understand, aren't you? Please
note the second definition below. Now to put "almost" dumbed down so
perhaps even you can understand that it's relative, let's say I am
doing to jobs. One will take 5 years to complete, the other 5 minutes.
Would you say that if I told you the one taking 5 years is "almost"
completed, that it would mean the same exact amount of time to complete
than when I said the task taking 5 minutes was "almost" done?

in·stan·ta·ne·ous ( P ) Pronunciation Key (nstn-tn-s)
adj.
1. Occurring or completed without perceptible delay: Relief was
instantaneous.
2. Done or made as quickly or directly as possible: an instantaneous
reply to my letter.
3. Present or occurring at a specific instant: instantaneous velocity;
instantaneous pressure.