Very true, John, but it looks like that has already happened ...also in
the "Yo Karen" thread, and thats been going on up to just a few moments
ago.

you statement might need amended:

"There's been no contention in the group for many hours now...."

BTW, I lost track of the site, but how many dollars were finally raised
in your "run for the Cure" site. is it offically tallied? or is it
still adding?



JohnH wrote:
On 12 Jun 2006 16:13:16 -0700, wrote:

John, looks like Karen is taking a beating on her E-tec thread, and
thats been going on for quite a while.......



JohnH wrote:
On 12 Jun 2006 16:06:07 -0700, wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 12 Jun 2006 05:31:22 -0700, wrote:

He's usually checked in by now giving somebody a stir-pot of double
talk and net-copping.

oh well, maybe later......

Maybe he has more sense than to respond to this crap.

John, the *K*I*N*G* I'm talking about doesn't use much sense at all.

There's been no contention in the group for many hours now. Why do
purposely try to start a flamefest?

So? That didn't answer the question.

Both the pro and con E-ted posts are interesting, until they devolve into
personal attacks.

On 12 Jun 2006 16:23:21 -0700, wrote:

Very true, John, but it looks like that has already happened ...also in
the "Yo Karen" thread, and thats been going on up to just a few moments
ago.

you statement might need amended:

"There's been no contention in the group for many hours now...."

BTW, I lost track of the site, but how many dollars were finally raised
in your "run for the Cure" site. is it offically tallied? or is it
still adding?



JohnH wrote:
On 12 Jun 2006 16:13:16 -0700, wrote:

John, looks like Karen is taking a beating on her E-tec thread, and
thats been going on for quite a while.......



JohnH wrote:
On 12 Jun 2006 16:06:07 -0700, wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 12 Jun 2006 05:31:22 -0700, wrote:

He's usually checked in by now giving somebody a stir-pot of double
talk and net-copping.

oh well, maybe later......

Maybe he has more sense than to respond to this crap.

John, the *K*I*N*G* I'm talking about doesn't use much sense at all.

There's been no contention in the group for many hours now. Why do
purposely try to start a flamefest?

So? That didn't answer the question.

Both the pro and con E-ted posts are interesting, until they devolve into
personal attacks.

I didn't notice any contention in the 'YO Karen' thread. Harry quoted some
remark from JimH, but there was nothing there I'd call contentious.

The final tally at the 'Racing for Renee' site was $5777.50. Our team was
the third highest in fundraising, which brought tears of joy to my
daughter's eyes. A lot of folks got behind it, and the donations are really
appreciated. The whole thing, even with the acrimony here, was a very
enjoyable experience where I felt like I was doing *something*. Being a
father of a girl with breast cancer is not something I'd wish on anyone.
The feeling of helplessness is miserable. I'm too used to being able to
'fix' their problems, not just stand by and watch.

Thanks for asking.