Sean Corbett wrote:
You wrote:


Do you really think that Dr Gray's scientific credentials
matter one tiny bit when he says right up front that his
motivation is political?

Sean Corbett wrote:

He says nothing of the sort, imbecile.

Why are you calling me names when you're the one that can't
read?

Impressive way of carrying on a debate, yessiree. Almost as
impressive as when you demand that other people answer your
oversimplified & irrelevant rhetorical questions, then
refuse to answer any questions yourself. Good going, comrade!


http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/journal...g/14744238.htm
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...warming05.html

Now what exactly is the quote where "he says right up front that his
motivation is political"?

"It's about politics. . ." Of course he was pointing out that those on
the OTHER SIDE were motivated by politics. Not Dr. Gray!

Let's look at some mo
Gray acknowledges that we've had some warming the past 30 years. "I
don't question that," he explains. "And humans might have caused a very
slight amount of this warming. Very slight. But this warming trend is
not going to keep on going. My belief is that three, four years from
now, . . ."

Main article: Truthiness
defined as the quality by which one purports to know something
emotionally or instinctively, without regard to evidence or intellectual
examination.

Now what exactly is the quote where "he says right up front that his
motivation is political"?


Jim wrote:
"It's about politics. . ." Of course he was pointing out that those on
the OTHER SIDE were motivated by politics. Not Dr. Gray!


Sure. It's ALWAYS the libby-rulls who are motivated by
snotty partisanship. Noble and honest conservaties have only
the good of the country at heart!

Especially when they are carrying a grudge over lost grants
& denied research funding.


Let's look at some mo
Gray acknowledges that we've had some warming the past 30 years. "I
don't question that," he explains.

Too funny!

DSK