http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...06/04/09/do090
7.xml&Sheet=/news/2006/04/09/ixworld.html


Gene Kearns wrote:
Leave it to old Sean to de-politicize the matter by posting editorial
content from a rag whose combination of personal links between the
paper's editorial team and the leadership of the Conservative Party,
in concert with the paper's influence over Conservative activists,
results in the paper often being jokingly referred to as the
Torygraph.

Yep. That's scientific!

The funny thing is that while a large body of scientific
evidence does point to global warming, it's causes and
effects are less clear.

Meanwhile, I haven't seen a single person or entity who says
either:
1- it's not happening
2- it might be happening, but if it is, man's activities
have nothing to do with it

that says so from scientific observation & reasoning, but
always (so far) from political conviction. There may be one
or two out there, but so far we haven't heard from them.
What would a logical person conclude from this fact?

DSK