![]() |
|
A Bayliner thread
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... RCE wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... I don't know Harry. Seem reasonable to me for the weight and speed. Correct me please if I am wrong, but didn't you opt for the larger fuel tank in your Parker? 150 gal, if I recall. Yet, you often speak of running with only half a tank to save on fuel burn. So, you "fill-up" to 75 gallons, same as the 27 foot Bayliner. Two feet bigger .... ummmm ... maybe there's a Bayliner in your future. RCE No, the tank I got with my Parker is the standard tank. I fill half way up unless I am going somewhere distant. I know. Just trying to bust your chops a bit. RCE For some reason, my 25' Parker is larger than the 27' Bayliner. West Coast measuring rules must be different. Most of the 19' and larger Bayliners are adequate for Chesapeake Bay. I wouldn't take one out in the Atlantic Ocean, though. My feeling is if they skimp on the deck hardware, something you can see, then they've really shortchanged you in the areas you cannot see. I'm unimpressed by the tales coming out of Bayliner's super sophisticated, robotic boatbuilding factories. Most of the better production boats are still built the old-fashioned way, by people. I haven't seen any of the "new" improved Bayliners, although I've been told that they have made giant strides in terms of quality compared to what was built 15 or 20 years ago. I remember when we decided to get into boating back in 1994. I had no clue what to look for and, having a limited budget, was looking for the biggest bang for the buck. I finally found what I thought I wanted and made an offer on it. It was (at the time) a 10 year old (1984) Bayliner - about a 25 footer I think. Excitedly, I mentioned to my father-in-law that I had made an offer on a boat and was waiting to see if the seller accepted the offer. (My father-in-law was still tooling around and fishing in his famous 1972 Uniflite at the time). When I told him it was a Bayliner, his jaw dropped and he basically threatened to disown me as his son-in-law if I bought it. Fortunately, the seller counter-offered and I walked away. RCE |
A Bayliner thread
Gene Kearns wrote: I agree. And statements such as, ""Quality", like beauty, can be a fairly subjective value," remind me that Ugly and lack of quality are pretty un-subjective and extending from the surface all the way to the bone..... :-) Ok, so share with us what the term "quality" means to you, and also just why everyone else must agree with your standards. That would be interesting. You may detect ugliness and lack of quality that extend all the way to the bone in cases where others would disagree. For instance, know of anybody who is married to a person that you think is just flat out "ugly," or a real (insert bitch or ******* here), yet in the eyes of the spouse that person is one heck of a good looking and superb human being? Ever watch somebody eating a dish in a restaurant that would make you gag and puke? Happens all the time. One man's trash is another's treasure. It's perfectly OK for people to look at a common group of factors and arrive at diverse conclusions. I expressed an opinion that this boat will prove adequately stout for its intended purposes. If you have been aboard an example of the same craft and have formed a different opinion that could be the basis for an interesting discussion. |
A Bayliner thread
You are wise man Grasshopper.
|
A Bayliner thread
Gene Kearns wrote: On Sun, 28 May 2006 19:59:43 -0700, JR North penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: http://www.bayliner.com/cruisers.asp...ype=1,4,9 ,23 Maybe they noticed that as a flaw and from 2005 to 2006 fixed their error. Interesting link, though. I noticed they are now touting Hand-Laid Fiberglass. I wonder what that *really* means. Hand held chopper gun? No more electronically controlled gee-whiz whatever it was that the resident Bayliner-village-idiot used to spout here to prove that Bayliner was better than any other boat? The general layup practiced on Bayliners of all sizes is a few layers of mat under the gelcoat, with the majority of the thickness created by chopped strand. Also true of Sea Ray, and a host of other mass-pro boats. The chop is now frequently laid into the mold with a robot arm (I think there's a good photo or video of the process on the Sea Ray website) to ensure an even application, and the mix of strand and resin is constantly monitored by computer during the layup so you run less risk of developiong dry or over-saturated pockets in the layup. To additionally guard against uneven saturation, molds are rotated 20-30 degrees on the longitudinal axis during the layup. Within a few years, we are going to see a greater number of boats built with the vacuum injection process. It is now common for cabin tops, decks, and other components with more manufacturers beginning to use vacuum bag molding for entire hulls. |
A Bayliner thread
Harry Krause wrote: wrote: Gene Kearns wrote: On Sun, 28 May 2006 19:59:43 -0700, JR North penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: http://www.bayliner.com/cruisers.asp...ype=1,4,9 ,23 Maybe they noticed that as a flaw and from 2005 to 2006 fixed their error. Interesting link, though. I noticed they are now touting Hand-Laid Fiberglass. I wonder what that *really* means. Hand held chopper gun? No more electronically controlled gee-whiz whatever it was that the resident Bayliner-village-idiot used to spout here to prove that Bayliner was better than any other boat? The general layup practiced on Bayliners of all sizes is a few layers of mat under the gelcoat, with the majority of the thickness created by chopped strand. Also true of Sea Ray, and a host of other mass-pro boats. The chop is now frequently laid into the mold with a robot arm (I think there's a good photo or video of the process on the Sea Ray website) to ensure an even application, and the mix of strand and resin is constantly monitored by computer during the layup so you run less risk of developiong dry or over-saturated pockets in the layup. To additionally guard against uneven saturation, molds are rotated 20-30 degrees on the longitudinal axis during the layup. Within a few years, we are going to see a greater number of boats built with the vacuum injection process. It is now common for cabin tops, decks, and other components with more manufacturers beginning to use vacuum bag molding for entire hulls. Many of the better boats are built via vacuum bagging, not vacuum injection. Every time you post a "review" of a Bayliner, it reminds me of how thankful I am that I never bought one. I'm not opposed to inexpensive boats. I've owned a few, and I am a fan of Carolina Skiffs, which are inexpensively made. Vacuum "bagging" is an injection process. The bag around the dry layup allows a vacuum to develop so the resin can be sucked and pumped thorughout the fabrics and (possible) cores. Bayliners certainly aren't for everybody, but for a casual family boat that will allow families to get out on the water they have a lot to offer for a relatively lower price. For fair weather boating in inland waters, freshwater lakes, and maybe even the ICW few families will actually *need* a better boat, although some will want higher degree of refinement or specialization and there is no shortage of boats that offer more features or stouter construction for a moderate to serious upcharge from Bayliner price tag. Bayliner doesn't build a trawler, so I have never had to seriously debate whether I would own one or not. :-) |
A Bayliner thread
Gene Kearns wrote: On 29 May 2006 18:48:04 -0700, penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Vacuum "bagging" is an injection process. The bag around the dry layup allows a vacuum to develop so the resin can be sucked and pumped thorughout the fabrics and (possible) cores. No, Vacuum bagging is just that ..... using a vacuum inside of a bag. We use that method frequently in composite repair and there is no mold nor injection equipment involved. Certainly, in a manufacturing setting you could employ a vacuum to do as you suggest, but vacuum bagging, per se, is not an "injection" process. The layup process I am referring to would not be possible without the vacuum created by enclosure in a bag. I will concede that I should have considered the difference between "injection" and "infusion", as the latter term would have been a more accurate usage. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:01 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com