More meat for the whiners
 

Calif Bill wrote:
You are such a Yellow Dog Democrat, that no matter what anyone says, you
will spout a Dem line.


Like what?

Since I pay very little attention to politically oriented
news, that would be rather difficult.

Besides, if you were in fact the "moderate" Democrat that
you claim to be, this would not offend you so much.

DSK

More meat for the whiners
 

JohnH wrote:
Your definition is also nonsense.


My definition of what? I am making factual observations. If
it appears to be nonsense to you, then give some reasons.
Otherwise you are just name-calling.


If I had to choose between goose **** and tits on a boar hog, I'd probably
choose the latter. That was the choice in the last election.
--

Is this your way of saying that President Bush has done a
really lousy job running the country? If you believe that's
true, then why are you so determined to insult anything that
encourages change?

DSK

More meat for the whiners
 

On Wed, 24 May 2006 16:46:20 -0400, DSK wrote:

JohnH wrote:
Your definition is also nonsense.


My definition of what? I am making factual observations. If
it appears to be nonsense to you, then give some reasons.
Otherwise you are just name-calling.

Bush-Cheney Cheerleader.


If I had to choose between goose **** and tits on a boar hog, I'd probably
choose the latter. That was the choice in the last election.
--

Is this your way of saying that President Bush has done a
really lousy job running the country? If you believe that's
true, then why are you so determined to insult anything that
encourages change?

DSK

Take your trash to an appropriate group. Let me know where it is.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

More meat for the whiners
 

My definition of what? I am making factual observations. If
it appears to be nonsense to you, then give some reasons.
Otherwise you are just name-calling.


JohnH wrote:
Bush-Cheney Cheerleader.


Well?

Is this an insult?

I have told you THE FACTS about your own behavior. It is not
intended to be name-calling. Actually, it's kind of funny
that you seems ashamed of your behavior without being
willing to acknowledge any wrongdoing.



Take your trash to an appropriate group. Let me know where it is.
--

In other words, you still don't have any facts on your side
and can't think of any intelligent reply.

DSK

More meat for the whiners
 

On Wed, 24 May 2006 17:14:07 -0400, DSK wrote:

My definition of what? I am making factual observations. If
it appears to be nonsense to you, then give some reasons.
Otherwise you are just name-calling.


JohnH wrote:
Bush-Cheney Cheerleader.


Well?

Is this an insult?

I have told you THE FACTS about your own behavior. It is not
intended to be name-calling. Actually, it's kind of funny
that you seems ashamed of your behavior without being
willing to acknowledge any wrongdoing.



Take your trash to an appropriate group. Let me know where it is.
--

In other words, you still don't have any facts on your side
and can't think of any intelligent reply.

DSK

You call me a Bush-Cheney Cheerleader. I say it's nonsense. You accuse me
of name-calling. Your 'facts' are as inane as your 'arguments' are
specious.

Again, let me know to which group you go. 'a.politics' is wide open.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

More meat for the whiners
 

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Calif Bill wrote:
You are such a Yellow Dog Democrat, that no matter what anyone says, you
will spout a Dem line.

Like what?

Since I pay very little attention to politically oriented news, that would
be rather difficult.

Besides, if you were in fact the "moderate" Democrat that you claim to be,
this would not offend you so much.

DSK


It offends me, because the Democratic party has been taken over by the
extreme left! It is not the party of Truman or even JFK. I sometimes think
it is further to the left than the Republicans are to the right overall.
You insult anybody that has a contrarian view to your own.

More meat for the whiners
 

Calif Bill wrote:
It offends me, because the Democratic party has been taken over by the
extreme left!

No it hasn't. That is simply the spinl spew from the
Bush/Cheney (not necessarily Republican) publicity machine.

Although let's be fair: cite three (or even two) concrete
examples of why the entire Democratic Party is far left.
Then maybe people will think you're not pumped full of
hate-spew fascist talk radio.

You insult anybody that has a contrarian view to your own.


Not at all. I just give the facts. Why do you keep whining
about being insulted?

DSK

More meat for the whiners
 

Calif Bill wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Calif Bill wrote:
I am a not a Bush cheer leader. This administration sucks.

It's really funny that you, who consider Zell Miller a good Democrat, and
have often hurled some of the worst insults at people criticising the
Bush/Cheney administration, insist that you're not a Bush/Cheney
Cheerleader.

Somebody call Rove, tell them he really has lost the base.


... Kerry, was proposing a couple hundred million increase in social
spending.

You said a few days ago that Kerry had no proposals? Which is it?

.... He was going to raise taxes on only the top 1%. You think his wife
would like that.

I don't know; but that would be a private matter, wouldn't it? Are you
insisting that relations between a President and his wife (or, as may
happen, between a President and her husband) are more important to the
country than that President's conduct of his professional duty?


.... He was the top fundraiser as he had the DNC behind him.

Yes, after he won the primaries.

.... I voted for Badnarick.

Funny you should say that. Baradnick got a miniscule percent of the vote,
I wonder if yours was counted?

In any event, all your statements tend to show that you are an avid &
utterly uncritical fan of President Bush.

..... WE as a people need to vote out 90% of the incumbents and tell the
ones coming in to correct their retirement plan!

Agreed. They should correct their medical plan too.

Another option is to simply pass a Constitutional amendment that any
retirement or insurance benefit conferred upon Congress must also be
applied to all citizens.

I like the proposal that all Congressman have to do their own taxes, get
audited every year, and pay double penalties. They would simplify the tax
code very fast!


.... DSK, you are so much a
Yellow Dog Democrat, that you would never look at the candidate except
for a 'D' after their name!!!!

Do you consider that an insult? In any event, it is certainly not true. I
am a registered Democrat because in the rural Southern county where I
first registered to vote, there was no Republican Party. I could have
registered as a Republican but I would not have had a vote in the
primaries or most of the local elections. Over the years I have voted for
whomever I considered the best candidate. That has included Republicans,
Democrats, independents, and unaffiliated. I have never tried to justify
voting for one candidate because of a public campaign of hatred & despite
against the other one, and you and John H have both done just now.

Maybe that's why I have never felt ashamed of how I cast my vote and tried
to lie about it.

And if you ever read any of my boating posts, you'll know my name.

DSK


You are such a Yellow Dog Democrat, that no matter what anyone says, you
will spout a Dem line.

Childish and petty name calling does nothing for your credibility.

More meat for the whiners
 

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 23 May 2006 20:22:14 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Turnout was higher in 2004 (55.3%) than at any other time since 1968
(60.8%). The highest turnout in the last 5 decades was 1960 (63.1%). Of
course, in 1960 a lot of dead Democrats from Chicago managed to climb out
of their graves and vote for Kennedy.

Still a sore loser, and you weren't even born yet, were you? ;-) By the
by, there is no doubt that Mayor Daly was a corrupt political hack, but it
would have taken more than Chicago to change that election. Kennedy's EC
votes were 303-219. Illinois, at the time, had 27 EC votes. Do the math.

303-27=271 (Illinois)

271-32=239 (California...which, after the absentee ballots were counted,
actually went to Nixon)

Nixon: 278
Kennedy: 239

(And that doesn't even take into account the shenanigans that went on with
Kennedy's buddies in Texas)

Interesting Electoral math ( More meat for the whiners)
 

NOYB wrote:
Still a sore loser, and you weren't even born yet, were you? ;-) By the
by, there is no doubt that Mayor Daly was a corrupt political hack, but it
would have taken more than Chicago to change that election. Kennedy's EC
votes were 303-219. Illinois, at the time, had 27 EC votes. Do the math.

303-27=271 (Illinois)

271-32=239 (California...which, after the absentee ballots were counted,
actually went to Nixon)

Nixon: 278
Kennedy: 239

Could somebody explain NOYB's exciting new math to me? I can't make
heads or tails of it.