More meat for the whiners
 

Bill , I agree with everything you said.

I voted for Chaney and GWB, and I threw that little jab in there as a
saterical joke.

If I could, would I vote for them again? Depends on what's on the
other side of the
fence[s]

But regardless...You're right!




Calif Bill wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
.. .


.Best would be a major CEO of a large,
successful company

Like...Dick Chaney?


or a Governor.


Like...GWB?


Like Chaney? Yes, but you also have to look at the business morals of the
person. The POTUS is a CEO of a large, powerful corporation, so the fact is
you need leadership ability. As to Governor, you also need one from a state
that has a powerful governorship. Texas is not one, but you also have to
look at the leadership of the person as a Governor. Clinton was also a
governor, and Arkansas is a one party state, that is backwoods. He also was
a crappy POTUS. He had the charisma, and brains to be a great POTUS, but he
failed to use his brain, and tried to run the country like Arkansas.
Surrounded himself with halfassed advisors, and looked at what a poll said
instead of making an informed decision. Sort of 'Mob Rule'.

More meat for the whiners
 

JohnH wrote:
Doug, you seem to consider anyone who disagrees with what you call 'an
argument' is a 'Bush-Cheney Cheerleader'. That's nonsense.

Yes, it is nonsense. The people who are avidly and
unblinkingly pro-Bush/Cheney, who will make any untruthful
assertion to support the current administration, and who get
angry at any criticism of them no matter how truthful or
justified, are Bush/Cheney Cheerleaders.

You should know, you seem to be one.



... I'm sure as hell
not a 'Bush-Cheney Cheerleader'

Actually, you sure as hell are.

For example, when asked to name a few positive
accomplishments of the Bush Administration, all you could
reply with was insults & abuse of any who asked such
questions. This happened repeatedly.


... One does not have
to like Bush to have voted for him. For God's sake, look at what the
alternative would have been!


Well, there you go. You are a Bush/Cheney Cheerleader. The
alternative would have been much better.



Have you done any boating yet?

Yes I have. Why do you ask?

DSK

More meat for the whiners
 

Calif Bill wrote:
I am a not a Bush cheer leader. This administration sucks.

It's really funny that you, who consider Zell Miller a good
Democrat, and have often hurled some of the worst insults at
people criticising the Bush/Cheney administration, insist
that you're not a Bush/Cheney Cheerleader.

Somebody call Rove, tell them he really has lost the base.


... Kerry, was proposing a couple hundred million increase
in social spending.

You said a few days ago that Kerry had no proposals? Which
is it?

.... He was going to
raise taxes on only the top 1%. You think his wife would like that.

I don't know; but that would be a private matter, wouldn't
it? Are you insisting that relations between a President and
his wife (or, as may happen, between a President and her
husband) are more important to the country than that
President's conduct of his professional duty?


.... He was
the top fundraiser as he had the DNC behind him.

Yes, after he won the primaries.

.... I voted for Badnarick.

Funny you should say that. Baradnick got a miniscule percent
of the vote, I wonder if yours was counted?

In any event, all your statements tend to show that you are
an avid & utterly uncritical fan of President Bush.

..... WE as
a people need to vote out 90% of the incumbents and tell the ones coming in
to correct their retirement plan!

Agreed. They should correct their medical plan too.

Another option is to simply pass a Constitutional amendment
that any retirement or insurance benefit conferred upon
Congress must also be applied to all citizens.

I like the proposal that all Congressman have to do their
own taxes, get audited every year, and pay double penalties.
They would simplify the tax code very fast!


.... DSK, you are so much a
Yellow Dog Democrat, that you would never look at the candidate except for a
'D' after their name!!!!


Do you consider that an insult? In any event, it is
certainly not true. I am a registered Democrat because in
the rural Southern county where I first registered to vote,
there was no Republican Party. I could have registered as a
Republican but I would not have had a vote in the primaries
or most of the local elections. Over the years I have voted
for whomever I considered the best candidate. That has
included Republicans, Democrats, independents, and
unaffiliated. I have never tried to justify voting for one
candidate because of a public campaign of hatred & despite
against the other one, and you and John H have both done
just now.

Maybe that's why I have never felt ashamed of how I cast my
vote and tried to lie about it.

And if you ever read any of my boating posts, you'll know my
name.

DSK

More meat for the whiners
 

NOYB wrote:
snip...
Of course, in 1960 a lot of dead Democrats from Chicago managed to climb
out of
their graves and vote for Kennedy.


Just goes to show the appeal he had to the average American!

More meat for the whiners
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
snip...
Of course, in 1960 a lot of dead Democrats from Chicago managed to climb
out of
their graves and vote for Kennedy.


Just goes to show the appeal he had to the average American!

The average American is like a dead Chicagoan?

More meat for the whiners
 

NOYB wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:
snip...
Of course, in 1960 a lot of dead Democrats from Chicago managed to climb
out of

their graves and vote for Kennedy.


Just goes to show the appeal he had to the average American!


The average American is like a dead Chicagoan?


Well...at least half of 'em. They did vote George W in for a second
term...didn't they?

More meat for the whiners
 

On Tue, 23 May 2006 20:22:14 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Turnout was higher in 2004 (55.3%) than at any other time since 1968
(60.8%). The highest turnout in the last 5 decades was 1960 (63.1%). Of
course, in 1960 a lot of dead Democrats from Chicago managed to climb out
of their graves and vote for Kennedy.

Still a sore loser, and you weren't even born yet, were you? ;-) By the
by, there is no doubt that Mayor Daly was a corrupt political hack, but it
would have taken more than Chicago to change that election. Kennedy's EC
votes were 303-219. Illinois, at the time, had 27 EC votes. Do the math.

More meat for the whiners
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:
snip...
Of course, in 1960 a lot of dead Democrats from Chicago managed to climb
out of

their graves and vote for Kennedy.


Just goes to show the appeal he had to the average American!


The average American is like a dead Chicagoan?


Well...at least half of 'em. They did vote George W in for a second
term...didn't they?

No. The dead Chicagoans voted as they always vote: Democrat.

More meat for the whiners
 

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Calif Bill wrote:
I am a not a Bush cheer leader. This administration sucks.

It's really funny that you, who consider Zell Miller a good Democrat, and
have often hurled some of the worst insults at people criticising the
Bush/Cheney administration, insist that you're not a Bush/Cheney
Cheerleader.

Somebody call Rove, tell them he really has lost the base.


... Kerry, was proposing a couple hundred million increase in social
spending.

You said a few days ago that Kerry had no proposals? Which is it?

.... He was going to raise taxes on only the top 1%. You think his wife
would like that.

I don't know; but that would be a private matter, wouldn't it? Are you
insisting that relations between a President and his wife (or, as may
happen, between a President and her husband) are more important to the
country than that President's conduct of his professional duty?


.... He was the top fundraiser as he had the DNC behind him.

Yes, after he won the primaries.

.... I voted for Badnarick.

Funny you should say that. Baradnick got a miniscule percent of the vote,
I wonder if yours was counted?

In any event, all your statements tend to show that you are an avid &
utterly uncritical fan of President Bush.

..... WE as a people need to vote out 90% of the incumbents and tell the
ones coming in to correct their retirement plan!

Agreed. They should correct their medical plan too.

Another option is to simply pass a Constitutional amendment that any
retirement or insurance benefit conferred upon Congress must also be
applied to all citizens.

I like the proposal that all Congressman have to do their own taxes, get
audited every year, and pay double penalties. They would simplify the tax
code very fast!


.... DSK, you are so much a
Yellow Dog Democrat, that you would never look at the candidate except
for a 'D' after their name!!!!

Do you consider that an insult? In any event, it is certainly not true. I
am a registered Democrat because in the rural Southern county where I
first registered to vote, there was no Republican Party. I could have
registered as a Republican but I would not have had a vote in the
primaries or most of the local elections. Over the years I have voted for
whomever I considered the best candidate. That has included Republicans,
Democrats, independents, and unaffiliated. I have never tried to justify
voting for one candidate because of a public campaign of hatred & despite
against the other one, and you and John H have both done just now.

Maybe that's why I have never felt ashamed of how I cast my vote and tried
to lie about it.

And if you ever read any of my boating posts, you'll know my name.

DSK


You are such a Yellow Dog Democrat, that no matter what anyone says, you
will spout a Dem line.

More meat for the whiners
 

On Wed, 24 May 2006 08:20:20 -0400, DSK wrote:

JohnH wrote:
Doug, you seem to consider anyone who disagrees with what you call 'an
argument' is a 'Bush-Cheney Cheerleader'. That's nonsense.

Yes, it is nonsense. The people who are avidly and
unblinkingly pro-Bush/Cheney, who will make any untruthful
assertion to support the current administration, and who get
angry at any criticism of them no matter how truthful or
justified, are Bush/Cheney Cheerleaders.

You should know, you seem to be one.



... I'm sure as hell
not a 'Bush-Cheney Cheerleader'

Actually, you sure as hell are.

For example, when asked to name a few positive
accomplishments of the Bush Administration, all you could
reply with was insults & abuse of any who asked such
questions. This happened repeatedly.


... One does not have
to like Bush to have voted for him. For God's sake, look at what the
alternative would have been!


Well, there you go. You are a Bush/Cheney Cheerleader. The
alternative would have been much better.



Have you done any boating yet?

Yes I have. Why do you ask?

DSK

Your definition is also nonsense.

If I had to choose between goose **** and tits on a boar hog, I'd probably
choose the latter. That was the choice in the last election.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************