Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newbie here...long time lurker, first time poster. Anyway, I'm doing some
research for my first boat for my family with two small kids (ages 6 & 2). Pretty much have my choices narrowed to a 17--19 ft bowrider, I/O, will be confined to inland lakes. I realize there's a pretty noticible power difference between the 4 & 6 cylinders, and also realize there's a difference in fuel consumption. At $3/gallon, I'd be lying if I wasn't concerned. I'm stuck between the fuel economy difference and the prospect that we will get bored with the limited power of a 4 cyl. as my kids grow up. I'm looking at getting a newer model that I probably will keep for several years. Towing & weight are also potential issues, because I don't want to have to buy a vehicle with a V8. What I'm wondering is if someone in a similar situation is going through the same debate, and what is your thought process behind your decision? Did anyone get a 4 cyl and wish they had gotten the 6, or vice versa? Thanks in advance for any input. Mike in NC |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have never heard of someone complaining about to much horsepower
|
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rick" wrote in message ... I have never heard of someone complaining about to much horsepower I agree. And the fuel savings, if any, of a 4 cyl. vs the 6 cyl. will be small compared to the frustration of not being able to pull a couple of skiers or tubes as your kids get older. RCE |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine wrote:
Newbie here...long time lurker, first time poster. Anyway, I'm doing some research for my first boat for my family with two small kids (ages 6 & 2). Pretty much have my choices narrowed to a 17--19 ft bowrider, I/O, will be confined to inland lakes. I realize there's a pretty noticible power difference between the 4 & 6 cylinders, and also realize there's a difference in fuel consumption. At $3/gallon, I'd be lying if I wasn't concerned. I'm stuck between the fuel economy difference and the prospect that we will get bored with the limited power of a 4 cyl. as my kids grow up. I'm looking at getting a newer model that I probably will keep for several years. Towing & weight are also potential issues, because I don't want to have to buy a vehicle with a V8. What I'm wondering is if someone in a similar situation is going through the same debate, and what is your thought process behind your decision? Did anyone get a 4 cyl and wish they had gotten the 6, or vice versa? Thanks in advance for any input. Mike in NC Mike, Everyone who has purchased a 4 cyl has wished they had gotten a 6 or 8. Have you ever considered buying a sailboat and not worrying about the performance of the kicker engine? -- Reggie That's my story and I am sticking to it. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christine" wrote in message news:UAr7g.1056 Newbie here...long time lurker, first time poster. Anyway, I'm doing some research for my first boat for my family with two small kids (ages 6 & 2). Pretty much have my choices narrowed to a 17--19 ft bowrider, I/O, will be confined to inland lakes. I realize there's a pretty noticible power difference between the 4 & 6 cylinders, and also realize there's a difference in fuel consumption. At $3/gallon, I'd be lying if I wasn't concerned. I'm stuck between the fuel economy difference and the prospect that we will get bored with the limited power of a 4 cyl. as my kids grow up. I'm looking at getting a newer model that I probably will keep for several years. Towing & weight are also potential issues, because I don't want to have to buy a vehicle with a V8. Lots of negatives here, but I'll leave to you the question as to whether you can basically afford this. Having said that:---- A) Your kids won't be small much longer. Get the 19ft. B) The marginal cost of the additional HP is not that great in the context of a boat purchase in general, but the HP will be essential as the kids get bigger and approach adult size. Get the 6 cyl. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You will want to push the 4 beyond it's "sweet spot" which may use more
fuel than the 6 at cruise speed anyway and it will definately wear out sooner and have more problems. Also, remember boats are expensive to buy (Sales tax, adding the toys, etc) Never plan on upgrading in a year or two, get something that you will be happy with for 5 years +. Hull shape and age of the engine will also have a lot to do with fuel economy. The newer engines are much more fuel efficient. John Gaquin wrote: "Christine" wrote in message news:UAr7g.1056 Newbie here...long time lurker, first time poster. Anyway, I'm doing some research for my first boat for my family with two small kids (ages 6 & 2). Pretty much have my choices narrowed to a 17--19 ft bowrider, I/O, will be confined to inland lakes. I realize there's a pretty noticible power difference between the 4 & 6 cylinders, and also realize there's a difference in fuel consumption. At $3/gallon, I'd be lying if I wasn't concerned. I'm stuck between the fuel economy difference and the prospect that we will get bored with the limited power of a 4 cyl. as my kids grow up. I'm looking at getting a newer model that I probably will keep for several years. Towing & weight are also potential issues, because I don't want to have to buy a vehicle with a V8. Lots of negatives here, but I'll leave to you the question as to whether you can basically afford this. Having said that:---- A) Your kids won't be small much longer. Get the 19ft. B) The marginal cost of the additional HP is not that great in the context of a boat purchase in general, but the HP will be essential as the kids get bigger and approach adult size. Get the 6 cyl. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RCE" wrote in message ... "Rick" wrote in message ... I have never heard of someone complaining about to much horsepower I agree. And the fuel savings, if any, of a 4 cyl. vs the 6 cyl. will be small compared to the frustration of not being able to pull a couple of skiers or tubes as your kids get older. RCE I third that! ;-) We run with a 4.3L V6 in our 20 foot runabout. The boat hits close to 50 mph WOT and is rated to pull 2 skiers. It is nice having the power when you need it. The larger engine will also help with the resale value. Go with the 19 footer with the V6. ;-) |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Outboard
G "Christine" wrote in message k.net... Newbie here...long time lurker, first time poster. Anyway, I'm doing some research for my first boat for my family with two small kids (ages 6 & 2). Pretty much have my choices narrowed to a 17--19 ft bowrider, I/O, will be confined to inland lakes. I realize there's a pretty noticible power difference between the 4 & 6 cylinders, and also realize there's a difference in fuel consumption. At $3/gallon, I'd be lying if I wasn't concerned. I'm stuck between the fuel economy difference and the prospect that we will get bored with the limited power of a 4 cyl. as my kids grow up. I'm looking at getting a newer model that I probably will keep for several years. Towing & weight are also potential issues, because I don't want to have to buy a vehicle with a V8. What I'm wondering is if someone in a similar situation is going through the same debate, and what is your thought process behind your decision? Did anyone get a 4 cyl and wish they had gotten the 6, or vice versa? Thanks in advance for any input. Mike in NC |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christine" wrote in message k.net... Newbie here...long time lurker, first time poster. Anyway, I'm doing some research for my first boat for my family with two small kids (ages 6 & 2). Pretty much have my choices narrowed to a 17--19 ft bowrider, I/O, will be confined to inland lakes. I realize there's a pretty noticible power difference between the 4 & 6 cylinders, and also realize there's a difference in fuel consumption. At $3/gallon, I'd be lying if I wasn't concerned. I'm stuck between the fuel economy difference and the prospect that we will get bored with the limited power of a 4 cyl. as my kids grow up. I'm looking at getting a newer model that I probably will keep for several years. Towing & weight are also potential issues, because I don't want to have to buy a vehicle with a V8. What I'm wondering is if someone in a similar situation is going through the same debate, and what is your thought process behind your decision? Did anyone get a 4 cyl and wish they had gotten the 6, or vice versa? Thanks in advance for any input. Mike in NC What vehicle do you intend to tow with? |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Sun, 07 May 2006 16:12:12 -0400 in rec.boats, Reginald P. Smithers penned the following thoughts: Everyone who has purchased a 4 cyl has wished they had gotten a 6 or 8. Nah... not really. I had a 19' bowrider with the old Chevy Iron Duke and it performed admirably. Had one of those in 1984 Pontiac Fiero. Excellent engine, but the worst piece of junk car I've ever owned. Actually the true "Iron Duke" 4 banger was a Pontiac engine, but was used in many GM cars including Camaros and Chevy S-10s in the 80's. RCE |